Re: Nvidia and its choice to read the GPL "differently"

From: Chief Gadgeteer (gadgeteer@elegantinnovations.org)
Date: Sat Jan 11 2003 - 17:16:40 EST

Next message: Andries Brouwer: "Re: hda has changed heads"
Previous message: Adam J. Richter: "Re: [PATCH] umode_t changes from Adam's mini-devfs"
In reply to: Rob Wilkens: "Re: Nvidia and its choice to read the GPL "differently""
Next in thread: Kurt Garloff: "Re: Nvidia and its choice to read the GPL "differently""
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Sat, 2003-01-11 at 14:53, Rob Wilkens wrote:
> I'd say terribly presumptuous, but I don't think it is presumptuous to
> say that if there are many patches (bug fixes, mostly) coming in that
> the code that was originally there was of questionable quality.

OK, then you do not know shit about software engineering within the FOSS
development paradigm.

-- Chief Gadgeteer Elegant Innovations

- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Andries Brouwer: "Re: hda has changed heads"
Previous message: Adam J. Richter: "Re: [PATCH] umode_t changes from Adam's mini-devfs"
In reply to: Rob Wilkens: "Re: Nvidia and its choice to read the GPL "differently""
Next in thread: Kurt Garloff: "Re: Nvidia and its choice to read the GPL "differently""
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Jan 15 2003 - 22:00:38 EST