On Sun, Jan 05, 2003 at 12:29:16PM -0800, Andre Hedrick wrote:
> Please list the files and functions you claim, under this decision.
> If you are the sole copyright holder of a file it is clean and clear.
> If you are not then you have a problem to settle with the joint owners.
> I will ignore your claim on shared copyrights until you have a settlement,
> if all persons holding copyright ownership agree with you then ...
>
> How soon will there be a patch-war for everyone to stake a claim, and
> screw the pooch ?
Andre, you just made the point i've been thinking of for
some time. Let the people who object to having an interface
for binary-only modules stake out their code. If you have
no code you have no legal standing. Identify what code you
won't allow the binary modules to use.
I'm a lurker here. I just don't feel very itchy. But if
someone actually declares needed code off-limits for the
binary modules i and others could very quickly develop
serious itches to scratch. The patch-war will be people
replacing code belonging to the extremists.
-- ________________________________________________________________ J.W. Schultz Pegasystems Technologies email address: jw@pegasys.wsRemember Cernan and Schmitt - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Jan 07 2003 - 22:00:30 EST