Re: Why is Nvidia given GPL'd code to use in closed source drivers?

• Next message: Rick A. Hohensee: "The only way around Microsoft"
• Previous message: Stefan Wieseckel: "[PATCH] 2.5.53 : fixed a few typos"
• In reply to: Andrew Walrond: "Re: Why is Nvidia given GPL'd code to use in closed source drivers?"
• Next in thread: John Bradford: "Re: Why is Nvidia given GPL'd code to use in closed source drivers?"
• Reply: John Bradford: "Re: Why is Nvidia given GPL'd code to use in closed source drivers?"
• Reply: Andrew Walrond: "Re: Why is Nvidia given GPL'd code to use in closed source drivers?"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Le mar 31/12/2002 à 11:51, Andrew Walrond a écrit :
> I hate feeding lawyers
> NVidia produce excellent gnu/linux/xfree drivers for their video cards,

?!? Since when does NVidia produce GNU (or even GPL) drivers ? That's
very new to me, could you provide a link ?

        Xav

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

• Next message: Rick A. Hohensee: "The only way around Microsoft"
• Previous message: Stefan Wieseckel: "[PATCH] 2.5.53 : fixed a few typos"
• In reply to: Andrew Walrond: "Re: Why is Nvidia given GPL'd code to use in closed source drivers?"
• Next in thread: John Bradford: "Re: Why is Nvidia given GPL'd code to use in closed source drivers?"
• Reply: John Bradford: "Re: Why is Nvidia given GPL'd code to use in closed source drivers?"
• Reply: Andrew Walrond: "Re: Why is Nvidia given GPL'd code to use in closed source drivers?"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Dec 31 2002 - 22:00:19 EST