RE: [PATCH] compatibility syscall layer (lets try again)

From: David Mosberger (davidm@napali.hpl.hp.com)
Date: Mon Dec 09 2002 - 13:46:15 EST

Next message: David Ronis: "Re: build failure in 2.4.20"
Previous message: Samuel Flory: "Re: HPT372 RAID controller"
In reply to: Linus Torvalds: "RE: [PATCH] compatibility syscall layer (lets try again)"
Next in thread: Paul Mackerras: "RE: [PATCH] compatibility syscall layer (lets try again)"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

>>>>> On Mon, 9 Dec 2002 09:35:59 -0800 (PST), Linus Torvalds <torvalds@transmeta.com> said:

Linus> And apparently ia64 is again being a singularly awkward
Linus> architecture.

I don't want to interfere with your ability to take potshots ;-), but
just to avoid confusion: passing syscall arguments in registers is NOT
an architectural requirement, it just makes good sense.

--david
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: David Ronis: "Re: build failure in 2.4.20"
Previous message: Samuel Flory: "Re: HPT372 RAID controller"
In reply to: Linus Torvalds: "RE: [PATCH] compatibility syscall layer (lets try again)"
Next in thread: Paul Mackerras: "RE: [PATCH] compatibility syscall layer (lets try again)"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Dec 15 2002 - 22:00:15 EST