Re: [PATCH] compatibility syscall layer (lets try again)

From: David S. Miller (davem@redhat.com)
Date: Sun Dec 08 2002 - 15:41:00 EST

Next message: Constantinos Antoniou: "Re: [ACPI] Re: [2.5.50, ACPI] link error"
Previous message: Simon Ward: "Re: PROBLEM: Oops.. NULL pointer reference in 2.4.20-ac1 (fixed)"
Next in thread: Stephen Rothwell: "Re: [PATCH] compatibility syscall layer (lets try again)"
Reply: Stephen Rothwell: "Re: [PATCH] compatibility syscall layer (lets try again)"
Maybe reply: Daniel Jacobowitz: "Re: [PATCH] compatibility syscall layer (lets try again)"
Maybe reply: Martin Schwidefsky: "Re: [PATCH] compatibility syscall layer (lets try again)"
Maybe reply: Martin Schwidefsky: "Re: [PATCH] compatibility syscall layer (lets try again)"
Maybe reply: Martin Schwidefsky: "Re: [PATCH] compatibility syscall layer (lets try again)"
Maybe reply: Martin Schwidefsky: "Re: [PATCH] compatibility syscall layer (lets try again)"
Maybe reply: Jamie Lokier: "Re: [PATCH] compatibility syscall layer (lets try again)"
Maybe reply: Martin Schwidefsky: "Re: [PATCH] compatibility syscall layer (lets try again)"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@transmeta.com>
Date: Fri, 6 Dec 2002 11:20:26 -0800 (PST)

   I did the nanosleep() implementation using the new infrastructure now, and
   am pushing it out as I write this.
...
   Compat people can hopefully fix it up.

I'm fixing this up right now.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Constantinos Antoniou: "Re: [ACPI] Re: [2.5.50, ACPI] link error"
Previous message: Simon Ward: "Re: PROBLEM: Oops.. NULL pointer reference in 2.4.20-ac1 (fixed)"
Next in thread: Stephen Rothwell: "Re: [PATCH] compatibility syscall layer (lets try again)"
Reply: Stephen Rothwell: "Re: [PATCH] compatibility syscall layer (lets try again)"
Maybe reply: Daniel Jacobowitz: "Re: [PATCH] compatibility syscall layer (lets try again)"
Maybe reply: Martin Schwidefsky: "Re: [PATCH] compatibility syscall layer (lets try again)"
Maybe reply: Martin Schwidefsky: "Re: [PATCH] compatibility syscall layer (lets try again)"
Maybe reply: Martin Schwidefsky: "Re: [PATCH] compatibility syscall layer (lets try again)"
Maybe reply: Martin Schwidefsky: "Re: [PATCH] compatibility syscall layer (lets try again)"
Maybe reply: Jamie Lokier: "Re: [PATCH] compatibility syscall layer (lets try again)"
Maybe reply: Martin Schwidefsky: "Re: [PATCH] compatibility syscall layer (lets try again)"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Dec 15 2002 - 22:00:13 EST