> You're not looking at a recent 2.5.x tree with the nanosleep() restart
> logic.
I had been looking at 2.5.50, we had a different meaning of current.
If you are saying that for any implementation of nanosleep I have to implement
the -ERESTART_RESTARTBLOCK thingy anyway, then I better start with it.
blue skies,
Martin
Linux/390 Design & Development, IBM Deutschland Entwicklung GmbH
Schönaicherstr. 220, D-71032 Böblingen, Telefon: 49 - (0)7031 - 16-2247
E-Mail: schwidefsky@de.ibm.com
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Dec 15 2002 - 22:00:15 EST