Re: Linux 2.4.20 ACPI

From: Ducrot Bruno (poup@poupinou.org)
Date: Thu Nov 21 2002 - 08:11:29 EST


On Wed, Nov 20, 2002 at 09:59:30PM +0000, David Woodhouse wrote:
>
> alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk said:
> > I guess sonypi could take the ACPI global lock ?
>
> I assume that's not a serious suggestion. Perhaps it could release the
> region while it's not _actually_ using it, and the ACPI code could be fixed
> to not touch regions which it doesn't own.
>
> Or we write proper PM code for sonypi and make it not possible to use both
> sonypi and ACPI at once.

It could be a solution, especially if you have a proper APM, but
you have also to implement in sonypi at least a replacement for the
idle loop in order to get power state saving of the processor, and
also have more battery saving. Of course, this is the first feature
I think about the new acpi code.

Cheers,

-- 
Ducrot Bruno
http://www.poupinou.org        Page profaissionelle
http://toto.tu-me-saoules.com  Haume page
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Nov 23 2002 - 22:00:36 EST