Re: Linux 2.4.20 ACPI

From: David Woodhouse (dwmw2@infradead.org)
Date: Wed Nov 20 2002 - 16:59:30 EST

Next message: Jamie Lokier: "Re: [rfc] epoll interface change and glibc bits ..."
Previous message: Gautam P: "Accessing # pkts received by kernel through eth0 - failing to get it right"
In reply to: Alan Cox: "Re: Linux 2.4.20 ACPI"
Next in thread: Alan Cox: "Re: Linux 2.4.20 ACPI"
Reply: Alan Cox: "Re: Linux 2.4.20 ACPI"
Reply: Ducrot Bruno: "Re: Linux 2.4.20 ACPI"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk said:
> I guess sonypi could take the ACPI global lock ?

I assume that's not a serious suggestion. Perhaps it could release the
region while it's not _actually_ using it, and the ACPI code could be fixed
to not touch regions which it doesn't own.

Or we write proper PM code for sonypi and make it not possible to use both
sonypi and ACPI at once.

-- dwmw2

- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Jamie Lokier: "Re: [rfc] epoll interface change and glibc bits ..."
Previous message: Gautam P: "Accessing # pkts received by kernel through eth0 - failing to get it right"
In reply to: Alan Cox: "Re: Linux 2.4.20 ACPI"
Next in thread: Alan Cox: "Re: Linux 2.4.20 ACPI"
Reply: Alan Cox: "Re: Linux 2.4.20 ACPI"
Reply: Ducrot Bruno: "Re: Linux 2.4.20 ACPI"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Nov 23 2002 - 22:00:34 EST