Re: [PATCH] PARAM 2/4

From: Willy Tarreau (willy@w.ods.org)
Date: Sat Nov 16 2002 - 02:15:09 EST


On Fri, Nov 15, 2002 at 05:51:48PM -0500, Jeff Garzik wrote:
[snip]
> 2) "proper", converted-to-Rusty-style driver code is going to have
>
> MODULE_blah
> MODULE_foo
> MODULE_bar
> PARAM
>
> You think that looks good??
>
> 3) modules a.k.a. drivers are going to be the more common users of this
> interface.
[snip]
> PARAM is ugly in drivers, and way too generic.

Why not DRIVER_PARAM in this case ? It's enough explicit and not misleading.
I too agree that PARAM is a bit too generic.

Cheers,
Willy

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Nov 23 2002 - 22:00:16 EST