Re: [ANNOUNCE] procps 2.0.10

From: Rik van Riel (
Date: Tue Oct 08 2002 - 10:05:34 EST

On Tue, 8 Oct 2002, J.A. Magallon wrote:

> >should always be 0.0% and it always is 0.0% here.
> >
> >I have no idea why it's displaying a wrong value on your
> >system, unless you somehow managed to run against a wrong
> > (shouldn't happen).
> It looks like the 2 first screenshots show buggy data:

Yup, that's the bug I fixed friday. Wait a moment, I fixed
it for five_cpu_numbers(), but probably not for the SMP CPU
code in top.c itself ...

I'll fix this one after lunch.



A: No.
Q: Should I include quotations after my reply?

- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to More majordomo info at Please read the FAQ at

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Oct 15 2002 - 22:00:25 EST