Re: [BENCHMARK] Corrected gcc3.2 v gcc2.95.3 contest results

From: Denis Vlasenko (vda@port.imtp.ilyichevsk.odessa.ua)
Date: Tue Sep 24 2002 - 08:45:05 EST


On 24 September 2002 01:01, Andrew Morton wrote:
> (And if there's more than a 1% variation between same kernel, compiled
> with different compilers then the test is bust. Kernel CPU time is
> dominated by cache misses and runtime is dominated by IO wait.
> Quality of code generation is of tiny significance)

Well, not exactly. If it is true that Intel/MS compilers beat GCC
by 30% on code size, 30% smaller kernel ought to make some difference.

However, that will become a GCC code quality benchmark then.

--
vda
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Sep 30 2002 - 22:00:18 EST