Re: [OKS] O(1) scheduler in 2.4

From: Tom Rini (trini@kernel.crashing.org)
Date: Mon Jul 01 2002 - 13:12:28 EST

Next message: Bill Davidsen: "[OKS] Kernel release management"
Previous message: Bill Davidsen: "[OKS] Async IO"
In reply to: Bill Davidsen: "[OKS] O(1) scheduler in 2.4"
Next in thread: J.A. Magallon: "Re: [OKS] O(1) scheduler in 2.4"
Reply: J.A. Magallon: "Re: [OKS] O(1) scheduler in 2.4"
Reply: Bill Davidsen: "Re: [OKS] O(1) scheduler in 2.4"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Mon, Jul 01, 2002 at 01:52:54PM -0400, Bill Davidsen wrote:

> What's the issue?

a) We're at 2.4.19-rc1 right now. It would be horribly
counterproductive to put O(1) in right now.
b) 2.4 is the _stable_ tree. If every big change in 2.5 got back ported
to 2.4, it'd be just like 2.5 :)
c) I also suspect that it hasn't been as widley tested on !x86 as the
stuff currently in 2.4. And again, 2.4 is the stable tree.

-- 
Tom Rini (TR1265)
http://gate.crashing.org/~trini/
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Bill Davidsen: "[OKS] Kernel release management"
Previous message: Bill Davidsen: "[OKS] Async IO"
In reply to: Bill Davidsen: "[OKS] O(1) scheduler in 2.4"
Next in thread: J.A. Magallon: "Re: [OKS] O(1) scheduler in 2.4"
Reply: J.A. Magallon: "Re: [OKS] O(1) scheduler in 2.4"
Reply: Bill Davidsen: "Re: [OKS] O(1) scheduler in 2.4"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Jul 07 2002 - 22:00:08 EST