Re: FUD or FACTS ?? but a new FLAME!

From: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz (B.Zolnierkiewicz@elka.pw.edu.pl)
Date: Sun Jun 02 2002 - 16:50:30 EST

Next message: William Lee Irwin III: "repetitive reinitialization of active_list and inactive_list in free_area_init_core()"
Previous message: William Lee Irwin III: "duplicate declaration of rq in sched_init()"
In reply to: Andre Hedrick: "Re: FUD or FACTS ?? but a new FLAME!"
Next in thread: Andre Hedrick: "Re: FUD or FACTS ?? but a new FLAME!"
Reply: Andre Hedrick: "Re: FUD or FACTS ?? but a new FLAME!"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

I apology for flames Andre, after some thinking I came to
conclusion that if speaking hardware you are generally right.

I hope we can together resolve transport layer issues in 2.5.

Regards

-- Bartlomiej

- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: William Lee Irwin III: "repetitive reinitialization of active_list and inactive_list in free_area_init_core()"
Previous message: William Lee Irwin III: "duplicate declaration of rq in sched_init()"
In reply to: Andre Hedrick: "Re: FUD or FACTS ?? but a new FLAME!"
Next in thread: Andre Hedrick: "Re: FUD or FACTS ?? but a new FLAME!"
Reply: Andre Hedrick: "Re: FUD or FACTS ?? but a new FLAME!"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jun 07 2002 - 22:00:13 EST