duplicate declaration of rq in sched_init()

• Next message: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz: "Re: FUD or FACTS ?? but a new FLAME!"
• Previous message: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz: "Re: [PATCH] 2.5.19 IDE 78"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

I found this one while trying to straighten out bootstrap ordering
issues elsewhere.

There appears to be a duplicate declaration of rq in sched_init().
This removes the nested declaration and otherwise leaves things alone.

Cheers,
Bill

===== kernel/sched.c 1.79 vs edited =====
--- 1.79/kernel/sched.c Wed May 29 08:26:26 2002
+++ edited/kernel/sched.c Sun Jun 2 14:38:24 2002
@@ -1591,9 +1591,9 @@
         int i, j, k;
 
         for (i = 0; i < NR_CPUS; i++) {
- runqueue_t *rq = cpu_rq(i);
                 prio_array_t *array;
 
+ rq = cpu_rq(i);
                 rq->active = rq->arrays;
                 rq->expired = rq->arrays + 1;
                 spin_lock_init(&rq->lock);
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

• Next message: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz: "Re: FUD or FACTS ?? but a new FLAME!"
• Previous message: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz: "Re: [PATCH] 2.5.19 IDE 78"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jun 07 2002 - 22:00:13 EST