Hi,
hmm.. You're demanding too much(mkreiserfs) - it's my home partition :)
And really sorry, i even forgot about reiserfsck it before the patch.
Maybe the corruptions are from previous kernels, but the zero-files
are observed for the first time, particularly in the .bash_history.
And yes, that's the same box (i have no other spare box to
experiment with). The memtest didn't found anything (maybe,
i had it run only 1pass for about 1 hour). The processor
is not overclocked, the cooler is native (sold together with
the processor). But the zero-files was seen in the day before
machine check exceptions were occured.
Sorry for such a dirty test environment, i was really not prepared.
Logs attached.
-alex
On Fri, Feb 08, 2002 at 08:51:55AM +0300, Oleg Drokin wrote:
> these corruptions are not from the previous kernels (particularly
> bad_leaf: block 211482 has wrong order of items record worries me)
Also I hope this is not on the same box, where you are getting
Machine Check Exceptions.
On Fri, Feb 08, 2002 at 08:51:56AM +0300, Oleg Drokin wrote:
> Hello!
>
> On Thu, Feb 07, 2002 at 11:02:35PM +0100, Alex Riesen wrote:
>
> > The reiserfsck showed up some nasty looking errors:
> > shrink_id_map: objectid map shrinked: used 4096, 5 blocks
> > grow_id_map: objectid map expanded: used 5120, 5 blocks
> > grow_id_map: objectid map expanded: used 10240, 10 blocks
> > bad_leaf: block 211482 has wrong order of items
> > ...more of that...
> > free block count 1326452 mismatches with a correct one 1326458.
> > on-disk bitmap does not match to the correct one. 1 bytes differ
>
> Have you mkreiserfs'ed your partition before testing the patch I've sent you?
> Or have you at least made a reiserfsck before a test run to ensure,
> these corruptions are not from the previous kernels (particularly
> bad_leaf: block 211482 has wrong order of items record worries me)
>
> > "reiserfsck --rebuild-tree" cured them without visible damages for now.
> > There were some messages about deleted blocks, expanded objectid map,
> > shrinked map and one "dir 1 2 has wrong sd_size 120, has to be 152".
> > I can send you logs, if needed.
> Sure, please do.
>
> > Does the 2.5.4-pre2 contains this patch ?
> Yes.
>
> Thank you.
>
> Bye,
> Oleg
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Feb 15 2002 - 21:00:23 EST