Re: [PATCH] C undefined behavior fix

From: Gabriel Dos Reis (gdr@codesourcery.com)
Date: Sun Jan 06 2002 - 15:37:59 EST


mike stump <mrs@windriver.com> writes:

| > From: Gabriel Dos Reis <gdr@codesourcery.com>
| > Date: 06 Jan 2002 14:22:45 +0100
|
| > Isn't the incriminated construct already outside of C and non-portable?
|
| That has been established and agreed upon. What we are now into is
| pragmatics. You now have to argue why we should not provide this
| feature in some form to users that ask for it.

Personnally, I don't have any sentiment against the assembler
solution. Dewar said it was unnecessarily un-portable, but that the
construct by itself *is* already unportable.

-- Gaby
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Jan 07 2002 - 21:00:31 EST