Re: [CFT] [JANITORIAL] Unbork fs.h

From: Alexander Viro (viro@math.psu.edu)
Date: Thu Jan 03 2002 - 11:45:14 EST


On Thu, 3 Jan 2002, Christoph Hellwig wrote:

> In article <E16M7Gz-00015E-00@starship.berlin> you wrote:
> > - inode = get_empty_inode();
> > + inode = get_empty_inode(sb);
>
> How about killing get_empty_inode completly and using new_inode() instead?
> There should be no regularly allocated inode without a superblock.

Seconded. However, you'll need to zero out ->i_dev for objects that
traditionally have zero ->st_dev (pipes and sockets).

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Jan 07 2002 - 21:00:21 EST