Re: [CFT] [JANITORIAL] Unbork fs.h

From: Christoph Hellwig (
Date: Thu Jan 03 2002 - 10:45:55 EST

In article <> you wrote:
> - inode = get_empty_inode();
> + inode = get_empty_inode(sb);

How about killing get_empty_inode completly and using new_inode() instead?
There should be no regularly allocated inode without a superblock.


Of course it doesn't work. We've performed a software upgrade.
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Jan 07 2002 - 21:00:21 EST