> I find the low latency patch makes a noticeable
> difference in e.g. q3a and rtcw - OTOH I have
> not been able to discern any tangible difference
> from the stock kernel when using -preempt.
The measurements I've seen put lowlatency ahead of pre-empt in quality
of results. Since low latency fixes some of the locked latencies it might
be interesting for someone with time to benchmark
vanilla
low latency
pre-empt
both together
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Jan 07 2002 - 21:00:18 EST