Re: [patch] Re: Framebuffer...Why oh Why???

• Next message: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo: "Re: [patch] Re: Framebuffer...Why oh Why???"
• Previous message: Michael Cohen: "New tree started ;)"
• In reply to: Alan Cox: "Re: [patch] Re: Framebuffer...Why oh Why???"
• Next in thread: Linus Torvalds: "Re: [patch] Re: Framebuffer...Why oh Why???"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Mon, 31 Dec 2001, Alan Cox wrote:

> > It's a bit weird... No one thinks about implementing SCSI or Ethernet drivers
> > in user space, but for graphics that's all OK. Worse, for graphics it's even
> > considered normal that the user space driver plays with the hardware behind the
> > kernel driver's back...
>
> Have a look at the iscsi back end.

Which one?

-- 
 "Love the dolphins," she advised him. "Write by W.A.S.T.E.."
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

• Next message: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo: "Re: [patch] Re: Framebuffer...Why oh Why???"
• Previous message: Michael Cohen: "New tree started ;)"
• In reply to: Alan Cox: "Re: [patch] Re: Framebuffer...Why oh Why???"
• Next in thread: Linus Torvalds: "Re: [patch] Re: Framebuffer...Why oh Why???"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Dec 31 2001 - 21:00:25 EST