Re: Limits broken in 2.4.x kernel.

From: Rik van Riel (riel@conectiva.com.br)
Date: Tue Dec 18 2001 - 11:10:19 EST

Next message: Doug Ledford: "Re: i810_audio mono troubles"
Previous message: Jesse Pollard: "Re: Booting a modular kernel through a multiple streams file / Making Linux multiboot capable and grub loading kernel modules at boot time."
In reply to: Alan Cox: "Re: Limits broken in 2.4.x kernel."
Next in thread: Alan Cox: "Re: Limits broken in 2.4.x kernel."
Reply: Alan Cox: "Re: Limits broken in 2.4.x kernel."
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Tue, 18 Dec 2001, Alan Cox wrote:

> > would be limited to 3 processes.
> >
> > I was curious if this fix would ever be merged into the Linux Kernel so
> > limits would actually work properly?
>
> Linus kept rejecting it. Now we have Marcelo as 2.4.x maintainer I'll
> look at submitting it. 2.5 will no doubt stay broken for a while.

One of the things to remember for when marcelo takes over
2.6, I guess ;)

Rik

-- DMCA, SSSCA, W3C? Who cares? http://thefreeworld.net/

http://www.surriel.com/ http://distro.conectiva.com/

- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Doug Ledford: "Re: i810_audio mono troubles"
Previous message: Jesse Pollard: "Re: Booting a modular kernel through a multiple streams file / Making Linux multiboot capable and grub loading kernel modules at boot time."
In reply to: Alan Cox: "Re: Limits broken in 2.4.x kernel."
Next in thread: Alan Cox: "Re: Limits broken in 2.4.x kernel."
Reply: Alan Cox: "Re: Limits broken in 2.4.x kernel."
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Dec 23 2001 - 21:00:16 EST