Re: Limits broken in 2.4.x kernel.

From: Alan Cox (alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk)
Date: Tue Dec 18 2001 - 09:59:53 EST

Next message: Jesse Pollard: "Re: Booting a modular kernel through a multiple streams file / Making Linux multiboot capable and grub loading kernel modules at boot time."
Previous message: Alan Cox: "Re: Turning off nagle algorithm in 2.2.x and 2.4.x kernels?"
In reply to: war: "Limits broken in 2.4.x kernel."
Next in thread: Rik van Riel: "Re: Limits broken in 2.4.x kernel."
Reply: Rik van Riel: "Re: Limits broken in 2.4.x kernel."
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

> would be limited to 3 processes.
>
> I was curious if this fix would ever be merged into the Linux Kernel so
> limits would actually work properly?

Linus kept rejecting it. Now we have Marcelo as 2.4.x maintainer I'll
look at submitting it. 2.5 will no doubt stay broken for a while.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Jesse Pollard: "Re: Booting a modular kernel through a multiple streams file / Making Linux multiboot capable and grub loading kernel modules at boot time."
Previous message: Alan Cox: "Re: Turning off nagle algorithm in 2.2.x and 2.4.x kernels?"
In reply to: war: "Limits broken in 2.4.x kernel."
Next in thread: Rik van Riel: "Re: Limits broken in 2.4.x kernel."
Reply: Rik van Riel: "Re: Limits broken in 2.4.x kernel."
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Dec 23 2001 - 21:00:16 EST