Re: IO degradation in 2.4.17-pre2 vs. 2.4.16

From: Andrew Morton (akpm@zip.com.au)
Date: Tue Dec 11 2001 - 19:23:42 EST

Next message: Randy.Dunlap: "Re: PROBLEM: Kernel Oops on cat /proc/ioports"
Previous message: Alan Cox: "Re: SV: Lockups with 2.4.14 and 2.4.16"
In reply to: Alan Cox: "Re: IO degradation in 2.4.17-pre2 vs. 2.4.16"
Next in thread: J Sloan: "Re: IO degradation in 2.4.17-pre2 vs. 2.4.16"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Alan Cox wrote:
>
> > > Time for CONFIG_OPTIMIZE_THROUGHPUT / CONFIG_OPTIMIZE_LATENCY ?
> > That would be the best thing to do, yes.
>
> /proc/sys not CONFIG_..

/proc/sys/vm/bdflush, to be precise.

I thought we discussed all this?

-
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Randy.Dunlap: "Re: PROBLEM: Kernel Oops on cat /proc/ioports"
Previous message: Alan Cox: "Re: SV: Lockups with 2.4.14 and 2.4.16"
In reply to: Alan Cox: "Re: IO degradation in 2.4.17-pre2 vs. 2.4.16"
Next in thread: J Sloan: "Re: IO degradation in 2.4.17-pre2 vs. 2.4.16"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Dec 15 2001 - 21:00:22 EST