Linux-Kernel Archive
By Thread

Starting: Sat Dec 08 2001 - 00:00:55 EST
Ending: Sat Dec 15 2001 - 20:58:16 EST

• RE: Linux 2.4.17-pre5 M. Edward Borasky (Fri Dec 07 2001 - 23:56:46 EST)
  • Re: Linux 2.4.17-pre5 David S. Miller (Sat Dec 08 2001 - 00:41:45 EST)
    • Re: Linux 2.4.17-pre5 Rusty Russell (Sat Dec 08 2001 - 05:46:31 EST)
      • Re: Linux 2.4.17-pre5 Alan Cox (Sat Dec 08 2001 - 19:31:13 EST)
      • Re: Linux 2.4.17-pre5 Rusty Russell (Sat Dec 08 2001 - 20:58:43 EST)
      • Re: Linux 2.4.17-pre5 Davide Libenzi (Sat Dec 08 2001 - 21:35:28 EST)
      • Re: Linux 2.4.17-pre5 Rusty Russell (Sun Dec 09 2001 - 01:20:18 EST)
      • Re: Linux 2.4.17-pre5 Alan Cox (Sun Dec 09 2001 - 11:24:59 EST)
      • Re: Linux 2.4.17-pre5 Davide Libenzi (Sun Dec 09 2001 - 14:48:53 EST)
      • Re: Linux 2.4.17-pre5 Mike Kravetz (Sun Dec 09 2001 - 17:44:33 EST)
      • Re: Linux 2.4.17-pre5 Davide Libenzi (Sun Dec 09 2001 - 18:50:04 EST)
      • Re: Linux 2.4.17-pre5 Alan Cox (Sun Dec 09 2001 - 18:57:47 EST)
      • Re: Linux 2.4.17-pre5 Alan Cox (Sun Dec 09 2001 - 11:16:21 EST)
      • Re: Linux 2.4.17-pre5 Rusty Russell (Sun Dec 09 2001 - 19:21:29 EST)
      • Re: Linux 2.4.17-pre5 Alan Cox (Sun Dec 09 2001 - 19:41:43 EST)
      • Re: Linux 2.4.17-pre5 Martin J. Bligh (Sun Dec 09 2001 - 21:10:23 EST)
      • Re: Linux 2.4.17-pre5 Rusty Russell (Mon Dec 10 2001 - 00:40:50 EST)
      • Re: Linux 2.4.17-pre5 Rusty Russell (Mon Dec 10 2001 - 00:31:41 EST)
      • Re: Linux 2.4.17-pre5 Alan Cox (Mon Dec 10 2001 - 03:28:57 EST)
      • Re: Linux 2.4.17-pre5 James Cleverdon (Mon Dec 10 2001 - 18:12:38 EST)
      • Re: Linux 2.4.17-pre5 Alan Cox (Mon Dec 10 2001 - 18:30:24 EST)
      • Re: Linux 2.4.17-pre5 Robert Varga (Tue Dec 11 2001 - 04:16:41 EST)
      • Re: Linux 2.4.17-pre5 David Weinehall (Tue Dec 11 2001 - 04:23:30 EST)
      • Re: Linux 2.4.17-pre5 Eric W. Biederman (Tue Dec 11 2001 - 04:00:23 EST)
      • Re: Linux 2.4.17-pre5 Alan Cox (Tue Dec 11 2001 - 18:14:34 EST)
      • Re: Linux 2.4.17-pre5 Marcelo Tosatti (Sun Dec 09 2001 - 14:38:15 EST)
      • Linux HMT analysis Anton Blanchard (Sat Dec 08 2001 - 19:17:29 EST)
      • Re: Linux HMT analysis Alan Cox (Sat Dec 08 2001 - 20:39:11 EST)
      • Re: Linux HMT analysis Alan Cox (Sat Dec 08 2001 - 20:41:00 EST)
      • Re: Linux 2.4.17-pre5 arjan@fenrus.demon.nl (Sun Dec 09 2001 - 04:47:46 EST)
    • Re: Linux 2.4.17-pre5 Eran Man (Sun Dec 09 2001 - 05:10:25 EST)
• Re: [PATCH] Revised extended attributes interface Nathan Scott (Fri Dec 07 2001 - 23:58:41 EST)
  • Re: [PATCH] Revised extended attributes interface Hans Reiser (Sat Dec 08 2001 - 15:17:21 EST)
    • reiser4 (was Re: [PATCH] Revised extended attributes interface) Nathan Scott (Mon Dec 10 2001 - 21:42:14 EST)
      • Re: reiser4 (was Re: [PATCH] Revised extended attributes interface) Hans Reiser (Tue Dec 11 2001 - 07:02:34 EST)
      • Re: reiser4 (was Re: [PATCH] Revised extended attributes interface) Anton Altaparmakov (Tue Dec 11 2001 - 14:23:46 EST)
      • Re: reiser4 (was Re: [PATCH] Revised extended attributesinterface) curtis@integratus.com (Tue Dec 11 2001 - 15:14:24 EST)
      • Re: reiser4 (was Re: [PATCH] Revised extended attributesinterface) Hans Reiser (Tue Dec 11 2001 - 16:34:41 EST)
      • Re: reiser4 (was Re: [PATCH] Revised extended attributesinterface) curtis@integratus.com (Tue Dec 11 2001 - 18:04:06 EST)
      • Re: reiser4 (was Re: [PATCH] Revised extended attributesinterface) Hans Reiser (Tue Dec 11 2001 - 18:28:28 EST)
      • Re: reiser4 (was Re: [PATCH] Revised extended attributesinterface) Anton Altaparmakov (Tue Dec 11 2001 - 18:46:48 EST)
      • Re: reiser4 (was Re: [PATCH] Revised extended attributesinterface) curtis@integratus.com (Tue Dec 11 2001 - 20:00:52 EST)
      • Re: reiser4 (was Re: [PATCH] Revised extended attributes interface) Hans Reiser (Tue Dec 11 2001 - 16:21:49 EST)
      • Re: reiser4 (was Re: [PATCH] Revised extended attributes interface) Anton Altaparmakov (Tue Dec 11 2001 - 18:33:52 EST)
      • Re: reiser4 (was Re: [PATCH] Revised extended attributes interface) Hans Reiser (Tue Dec 11 2001 - 18:59:09 EST)
      • Re: reiser4 (was Re: [PATCH] Revised extended attributes interface) Anton Altaparmakov (Tue Dec 11 2001 - 21:16:18 EST)
      • Re: reiser4 (was Re: [PATCH] Revised extended attributes interface) Hans Reiser (Wed Dec 12 2001 - 07:02:19 EST)
      • Re: reiser4 (was Re: [PATCH] Revised extended attributes interface) Anton Altaparmakov (Wed Dec 12 2001 - 08:34:00 EST)
      • Re: reiser4 (was Re: [PATCH] Revised extended attributes interface) Hans Reiser (Wed Dec 12 2001 - 10:40:05 EST)
      • Re: reiser4 (was Re: [PATCH] Revised extended attributes interface) Andrew Pimlott (Wed Dec 12 2001 - 20:43:33 EST)
      • Re: reiser4 (was Re: [PATCH] Revised extended attributes interface) Hans Reiser (Thu Dec 13 2001 - 04:23:46 EST)
      • User-manageable sub-ids proposals Romano Giannetti (Thu Dec 13 2001 - 05:36:16 EST)
      • Re: User-manageable sub-ids proposals Ragnar Kjørstad (Thu Dec 13 2001 - 08:37:52 EST)
      • Re: User-manageable sub-ids proposals Romano Giannetti (Thu Dec 13 2001 - 11:06:29 EST)
      • Re: User-manageable sub-ids proposals Ragnar Kjørstad (Thu Dec 13 2001 - 13:58:57 EST)
      • re: User-manageable sub-ids proposals Jacques Gelinas (Thu Dec 13 2001 - 11:02:15 EST)
      • Re: User-manageable sub-ids proposals David Wagner (Thu Dec 13 2001 - 18:24:01 EST)
      • Re: reiser4 (was Re: [PATCH] Revised extended attributes interface) Andrew Pimlott (Thu Dec 13 2001 - 10:27:29 EST)
      • Re: reiser4 (was Re: [PATCH] Revised extended attributes interface) Hans Reiser (Thu Dec 13 2001 - 15:47:01 EST)
      • Re: reiser4 (was Re: [PATCH] Revised extended attributes interface) Anton Altaparmakov (Thu Dec 13 2001 - 16:01:54 EST)
      • Re: reiser4 (was Re: [PATCH] Revised extended attributes interface) Hans Reiser (Fri Dec 14 2001 - 06:10:57 EST)
      • Re: reiser4 (was Re: [PATCH] Revised extended attributes interface) dmeyer@dmeyer.net (Fri Dec 14 2001 - 10:06:38 EST)
      • Re: reiser4 (was Re: [PATCH] Revised extended attributes interface) Bernd Eckenfels (Fri Dec 14 2001 - 16:23:56 EST)
      • Re: reiser4 (was Re: [PATCH] Revised extended attributes interface) Brad Boyer (Fri Dec 14 2001 - 13:27:14 EST)
  • Re: [PATCH] Revised extended attributes interface Stephen C. Tweedie (Mon Dec 10 2001 - 06:52:09 EST)
    • Re: [PATCH] Revised extended attributes interface Peter J. Braam (Mon Dec 10 2001 - 10:00:03 EST)
      • Re: [PATCH] Revised extended attributes interface Stephen C. Tweedie (Mon Dec 10 2001 - 10:56:28 EST)
      • Re: [PATCH] Revised extended attributes interface Mr. James W. Laferriere (Mon Dec 10 2001 - 11:00:06 EST)
      • Re: [PATCH] Revised extended attributes interface Stephen C. Tweedie (Mon Dec 10 2001 - 11:15:33 EST)
      • Re: [PATCH] Revised extended attributes interface John Stoffel (Mon Dec 10 2001 - 14:01:52 EST)
    • Re: [PATCH] Revised extended attributes interface Timothy Shimmin (Mon Dec 10 2001 - 20:22:58 EST)
      • Re: [PATCH] Revised extended attributes interface Stephen C. Tweedie (Tue Dec 11 2001 - 06:33:06 EST)
      • Implementing POSIX ACLs - was: Re: [PATCH] Revised extended attributes interface Anton Altaparmakov (Tue Dec 11 2001 - 08:30:16 EST)
      • Re: Implementing POSIX ACLs - was: Re: [PATCH] Revised extended attributes interface Stephen C. Tweedie (Tue Dec 11 2001 - 09:34:44 EST)
      • Re: Implementing POSIX ACLs - was: Re: [PATCH] Revised extended attributes interface Anton Altaparmakov (Tue Dec 11 2001 - 10:15:50 EST)
    • Re: [PATCH] Revised extended attributes interface Nathan Scott (Mon Dec 10 2001 - 20:41:15 EST)
      • Re: [PATCH] Revised extended attributes interface Stephen C. Tweedie (Tue Dec 11 2001 - 08:47:58 EST)
      • Re: [PATCH] Revised extended attributes interface Hans Reiser (Tue Dec 11 2001 - 13:23:45 EST)
      • Re: [PATCH] Revised extended attributes interface Anton Altaparmakov (Tue Dec 11 2001 - 13:46:43 EST)
      • Re: Implementing POSIX ACLs - was Re: [PATCH] Revised extended attributes interface Nathan Scott (Tue Dec 11 2001 - 18:37:39 EST)
• The demise of notify_change. Britt Park (Sat Dec 08 2001 - 00:19:35 EST)
  • Re: The demise of notify_change. Chris Wright (Sun Dec 09 2001 - 21:41:47 EST)
• Re: [PATCH] Making vmlinux Multiboot compliant and grub capable of loading modules at boot time. Maciek Nowacki (Sat Dec 08 2001 - 00:56:53 EST)
  • Re: [PATCH] Making vmlinux Multiboot compliant and grub capable of loading modules at boot time. Christian Koenig (Sun Dec 09 2001 - 10:56:25 EST)
• Patch?: linux-2.5.1-pre7/drivers/block/xd.c compilation fixes Adam J. Richter (Sat Dec 08 2001 - 01:08:08 EST)
  • Re: Patch?: linux-2.5.1-pre7/drivers/block/xd.c compilation fixes Jens Axboe (Sat Dec 08 2001 - 04:06:24 EST)
• Re: File copy system call proposal Quinn Harris (Sat Dec 08 2001 - 01:03:59 EST)
  • Re: File copy system call proposal Daniel Phillips (Sat Dec 08 2001 - 08:57:17 EST)
    • Re: File copy system call proposal H. Peter Anvin (Sat Dec 08 2001 - 19:19:26 EST)
      • Re: File copy system call proposal Quinn Harris (Sat Dec 08 2001 - 23:56:25 EST)
    • Re: File copy system call proposal Albert D. Cahalan (Mon Dec 10 2001 - 00:44:54 EST)
      • Re: File copy system call proposal Hans Reiser (Sun Dec 09 2001 - 15:25:28 EST)
      • Re: File copy system call proposal Daniel Phillips (Mon Dec 10 2001 - 10:19:33 EST)
      • Re: File copy system call proposal Andreas Dilger (Thu Dec 13 2001 - 05:01:08 EST)
  • Re: File copy system call proposal Quinn Harris (Sat Dec 08 2001 - 14:23:50 EST)
    • Re: File copy system call proposal Ton Hospel (Sat Dec 08 2001 - 18:11:13 EST)
  • Re: File copy system call proposal Pavel Machek (Sun Dec 09 2001 - 10:35:23 EST)
    • Re: File copy system call proposal vda (Mon Dec 10 2001 - 10:20:07 EST)
    • Re: File copy system call proposal Albert D. Cahalan (Mon Dec 10 2001 - 06:50:54 EST)
      • Re: File copy system call proposal Pavel Machek (Mon Dec 10 2001 - 07:13:53 EST)
      • Re: File copy system call proposal Hans Reiser (Sun Dec 09 2001 - 21:49:50 EST)
  • Re: File copy system call proposal Petr Vandrovec (Mon Dec 10 2001 - 12:48:14 EST)
• reiserfs_delete_solid_item [ xxx xxx 0(1) DIR ] not found when FS full? Jurriaan on Alpha (Sat Dec 08 2001 - 01:29:21 EST)
  • Re: reiserfs_delete_solid_item [ xxx xxx 0(1) DIR ] not found when FS full? Alexander Zarochentcev (Sat Dec 08 2001 - 09:26:03 EST)
    • Re: reiserfs_delete_solid_item [ xxx xxx 0(1) DIR ] not found when FS full? Vladimir V. Saveliev (Sun Dec 09 2001 - 07:39:59 EST)
• two many zlib's in the kernel David Fries (Sat Dec 08 2001 - 01:31:52 EST)
• Re: Linux 2.4.17-pre6 H. Peter Anvin (Sat Dec 08 2001 - 01:40:50 EST)
  • Re: Linux 2.4.17-pre6 Alan Cox (Sat Dec 08 2001 - 06:25:06 EST)
• Where can a Solaris guy learn all about the linux kernel and device drivers? Buddy Lumpkin (Sat Dec 08 2001 - 02:04:19 EST)
  • Re: Where can a Solaris guy learn all about the linux kernel and device drivers? Lionel Bouton (Sat Dec 08 2001 - 06:12:05 EST)
  • Re: Where can a Solaris guy learn all about the linux kernel and device drivers? Daniel Freedman (Sat Dec 08 2001 - 10:58:08 EST)
• Re: [reiserfs-dev] Re: Ext2 directory index: ALS paper and benchmarks Linus Torvalds (Sat Dec 08 2001 - 02:19:32 EST)
  • Re: [reiserfs-dev] Re: Ext2 directory index: ALS paper and benchmarks Daniel Phillips (Sat Dec 08 2001 - 12:32:55 EST)
    • Re: [reiserfs-dev] Re: Ext2 directory index: ALS paper and benchmarks Jeff Garzik (Sat Dec 08 2001 - 12:54:27 EST)
      • Re: [reiserfs-dev] Re: Ext2 directory index: ALS paper and benchmarks Daniel Phillips (Sat Dec 08 2001 - 22:27:29 EST)
      • Re: [reiserfs-dev] Re: Ext2 directory index: ALS paper and benchmarks Linus Torvalds (Sat Dec 08 2001 - 23:19:44 EST)
      • Re: [reiserfs-dev] Re: Ext2 directory index: ALS paper and benchmarks Alan Cox (Sun Dec 09 2001 - 11:29:00 EST)
      • Re: [reiserfs-dev] Re: Ext2 directory index: ALS paper and benchmarks Daniel Phillips (Sun Dec 09 2001 - 15:13:34 EST)
      • Re: [reiserfs-dev] Re: Ext2 directory index: ALS paper and benchmarks Linus Torvalds (Mon Dec 10 2001 - 01:27:36 EST)
      • Re: [reiserfs-dev] Re: Ext2 directory index: ALS paper and benchmarks Alexander Viro (Mon Dec 10 2001 - 01:49:37 EST)
      • Re: [reiserfs-dev] Re: Ext2 directory index: ALS paper and benchmarks Alan Cox (Mon Dec 10 2001 - 03:32:57 EST)
      • Re: [reiserfs-dev] Re: Ext2 directory index: ALS paper and benchmarks Daniel Phillips (Mon Dec 10 2001 - 11:14:38 EST)
    • Re: [reiserfs-dev] Re: Ext2 directory index: ALS paper and benchmarks Hans Reiser (Sat Dec 08 2001 - 15:28:00 EST)
      • Re: [reiserfs-dev] Re: Ext2 directory index: ALS paper and benchmarks Ragnar Kjørstad (Sat Dec 08 2001 - 16:10:26 EST)
  • Re: [reiserfs-dev] Re: Ext2 directory index: ALS paper and benchmarks Jeremy Fitzhardinge (Sat Dec 08 2001 - 13:02:02 EST)
    • Re: [reiserfs-dev] Re: Ext2 directory index: ALS paper and benchmarks Daniel Phillips (Sat Dec 08 2001 - 21:24:40 EST)
  • Re: [reiserfs-dev] Re: Ext2 directory index: ALS paper and benchmarks Ragnar Kjørstad (Sat Dec 08 2001 - 14:16:39 EST)
    • Re: [reiserfs-dev] Re: Ext2 directory index: ALS paper and benchmarks Hans Reiser (Sat Dec 08 2001 - 14:55:06 EST)
      • Re: [reiserfs-dev] Re: Ext2 directory index: ALS paper and benchmarks Daniel Phillips (Sat Dec 08 2001 - 21:47:31 EST)
    • Re: [reiserfs-dev] Re: Ext2 directory index: ALS paper and benchmarks Daniel Phillips (Sat Dec 08 2001 - 21:39:38 EST)
• 2.4.17-pre6 still not binutils friendly in drm section safemode (Sat Dec 08 2001 - 02:34:27 EST)
  • Re: 2.4.17-pre6 still not binutils friendly in drm section Keith Owens (Sat Dec 08 2001 - 06:53:10 EST)
• Re: [RFC] [PATCH] Scalable Statistics Counters Rusty Russell (Sat Dec 08 2001 - 02:38:09 EST)
• Re: IDE-DMA woes Ishan Oshadi Jayawardena (Sat Dec 08 2001 - 14:47:19 EST)
  • Re: IDE-DMA woes Ishan Oshadi Jayawardena (Sat Dec 08 2001 - 14:47:58 EST)
  • Re: IDE-DMA woes Andre Hedrick (Sat Dec 08 2001 - 16:09:35 EST)
    • Re: IDE-DMA woes Jacob Luna Lundberg (Sat Dec 08 2001 - 16:56:23 EST)
      • Re: IDE-DMA woes François Cami (Sat Dec 08 2001 - 17:11:46 EST)
      • Re: IDE-DMA woes J Sloan (Sat Dec 08 2001 - 17:25:18 EST)
      • Re: IDE-DMA woes Simon Turvey (Sat Dec 08 2001 - 20:08:30 EST)
      • Re: IDE-DMA woes Andre Hedrick (Mon Dec 10 2001 - 03:31:22 EST)
• CML 1.9.5 is available. Eric S. Raymond (Sat Dec 08 2001 - 02:59:46 EST)
• Support of sonypi module/code Lee Packham (Sat Dec 08 2001 - 03:40:30 EST)
  • Re: Support of sonypi module/code Stelian Pop (Sat Dec 08 2001 - 11:55:44 EST)
  • Re: Support of sonypi module/code Pavel Machek (Sun Dec 09 2001 - 17:13:33 EST)
    • Re: Support of sonypi module/code Stelian Pop (Mon Dec 10 2001 - 08:51:53 EST)
• Re: Would the father of init_mem_lth please stand up Jens Axboe (Sat Dec 08 2001 - 03:52:51 EST)
  • Re: Would the father of init_mem_lth please stand up Alan Cox (Sat Dec 08 2001 - 06:07:13 EST)
    • Re: Would the father of init_mem_lth please stand up Pete Zaitcev (Sat Dec 08 2001 - 11:36:19 EST)
      • Re: Would the father of init_mem_lth please stand up Alan Cox (Sat Dec 08 2001 - 15:43:26 EST)
  • Re: Would the father of init_mem_lth please stand up Eric Lammerts (Sat Dec 08 2001 - 06:47:05 EST)
    • Re: Would the father of init_mem_lth please stand up Pete Zaitcev (Sat Dec 08 2001 - 11:32:00 EST)
  • Re: Would the father of init_mem_lth please stand up Andries.Brouwer@cwi.nl (Sat Dec 08 2001 - 14:16:50 EST)
  • Re: Would the father of init_mem_lth please stand up Andries.Brouwer@cwi.nl (Sat Dec 08 2001 - 15:43:17 EST)
    • Re: Would the father of init_mem_lth please stand up Alan Cox (Sat Dec 08 2001 - 15:58:05 EST)
  • Re: Would the father of init_mem_lth please stand up Pete Zaitcev (Sat Dec 08 2001 - 16:56:07 EST)
• Re: [PATCH] i810_audio fix for version 0.11 Andris Pavenis (Sat Dec 08 2001 - 03:39:25 EST)
  • Re: [PATCH] i810_audio fix for version 0.11 Andris Pavenis (Sat Dec 08 2001 - 04:25:19 EST)
    • Re: [PATCH] i810_audio fix for version 0.11 Doug Ledford (Sat Dec 08 2001 - 04:36:21 EST)
      • Re: [PATCH] i810_audio fix for version 0.11 Andris Pavenis (Sat Dec 08 2001 - 04:45:10 EST)
      • Re: [PATCH] i810_audio fix for version 0.11 Doug Ledford (Mon Dec 10 2001 - 19:42:19 EST)
      • Re: [PATCH] i810_audio fix for version 0.11 Andris Pavenis (Tue Dec 11 2001 - 01:59:20 EST)
• Re: [PATCH] for pre6: hisax user config MAX_CARD and fix potential data trashing Kai Germaschewski (Sat Dec 08 2001 - 04:39:47 EST)
  • Re: [PATCH] for pre6: hisax user config MAX_CARD and fix potential data trashing Stephan von Krawczynski (Sat Dec 08 2001 - 10:12:37 EST)
• ACPI IRQ routing (was [ACPI] ACPI source release updated (20011205)) Kai Germaschewski (Sat Dec 08 2001 - 04:40:11 EST)
• Re: Some compiler warnings in 2.4.17-pre5 David Woodhouse (Sat Dec 08 2001 - 04:47:56 EST)
  • Re: Some compiler warnings in 2.4.17-pre5 Alan Cox (Sat Dec 08 2001 - 06:37:48 EST)
    • Re: Some compiler warnings in 2.4.17-pre5 Adrian Bunk (Wed Dec 12 2001 - 14:17:32 EST)
• putc() locking (Was Re: horrible disk thorughput on itanium) linux@horizon.com (Sat Dec 08 2001 - 04:56:42 EST)
• Re: question about kernel 2.4 ramdisk Christoph Rohland (Sat Dec 08 2001 - 04:53:48 EST)
  • Re: question about kernel 2.4 ramdisk David Gibson (Fri Dec 14 2001 - 00:35:59 EST)
• Re: Linux - Patch to shmat Christoph Rohland (Sat Dec 08 2001 - 04:53:57 EST)
• [PATCH] devfs support in char/raw.c Alessandro Amici (Sat Dec 08 2001 - 05:31:35 EST)
• ide_dmaproc & apm Anders Eriksson (Sat Dec 08 2001 - 06:02:06 EST)
• Re: Oops report for 2.2.19(ext3) Alan Cox (Sat Dec 08 2001 - 06:29:58 EST)
  • Re: Oops report for 2.2.19(ext3) Arun Bhalla (Sat Dec 08 2001 - 18:58:01 EST)
• Re: [PATCH] 2.4.16 kernel/printk.c (per processorinitializationcheck) Alan Cox (Sat Dec 08 2001 - 06:27:19 EST)
  • Re: [PATCH] 2.4.16 kernel/printk.c (per processorinitializationcheck) David Mosberger (Sat Dec 08 2001 - 11:41:23 EST)
    • Re: [PATCH] 2.4.16 kernel/printk.c (per processorinitializationcheck) Alan Cox (Sat Dec 08 2001 - 15:45:07 EST)
      • Re: [PATCH] 2.4.16 kernel/printk.c (per processorinitializationcheck) David Mosberger (Sat Dec 08 2001 - 19:32:46 EST)
      • Re: [PATCH] 2.4.16 kernel/printk.c (per processorinitializationcheck) Alan Cox (Sat Dec 08 2001 - 19:55:25 EST)
      • Re: [PATCH] 2.4.16 kernel/printk.c (per processorinitializationcheck) David Mosberger (Sat Dec 08 2001 - 19:58:15 EST)
      • Re: [PATCH] 2.4.16 kernel/printk.c (per processorinitializationcheck) Alan Cox (Sat Dec 08 2001 - 20:15:25 EST)
      • Re: [PATCH] 2.4.16 kernel/printk.c (per processorinitializationcheck) David Mosberger (Sat Dec 08 2001 - 20:14:40 EST)
      • Re: [PATCH] 2.4.16 kernel/printk.c (per processorinitializationcheck) Alan Cox (Sat Dec 08 2001 - 20:32:29 EST)
  • Re: [PATCH] 2.4.16 kernel/printk.c (per processorinitializationcheck) Manfred Spraul (Sat Dec 08 2001 - 12:36:51 EST)
• Re: Linux 2.4.17-pre6 drm-4.0 Alan Cox (Sat Dec 08 2001 - 06:35:10 EST)
  • Re: Linux 2.4.17-pre6 drm-4.0 Alan Cox (Sat Dec 08 2001 - 06:35:43 EST)
    • Re: [Linux-ia64] Re: Linux 2.4.17-pre6 drm-4.0 Christoph Hellwig (Sat Dec 08 2001 - 07:31:56 EST)
      • Re: [Linux-ia64] Re: Linux 2.4.17-pre6 drm-4.0 Alan Cox (Sat Dec 08 2001 - 10:34:38 EST)
      • Re: [Linux-ia64] Re: Linux 2.4.17-pre6 drm-4.0 Christoph Hellwig (Sun Dec 09 2001 - 11:42:50 EST)
• Re: On re-working the major/minor system Alan Cox (Sat Dec 08 2001 - 06:42:48 EST)
  • Re: On re-working the major/minor system Andries.Brouwer@cwi.nl (Sat Dec 08 2001 - 12:55:31 EST)
  • Re: On re-working the major/minor system H. Peter Anvin (Sat Dec 08 2001 - 15:37:48 EST)
  • Re: On re-working the major/minor system Kai Henningsen (Sun Dec 09 2001 - 07:06:00 EST)
    • Re: On re-working the major/minor system H. Peter Anvin (Sun Dec 09 2001 - 16:57:21 EST)
      • Re: On re-working the major/minor system Kai Henningsen (Tue Dec 11 2001 - 15:45:00 EST)
  • Re: On re-working the major/minor system Andries.Brouwer@cwi.nl (Sun Dec 09 2001 - 16:37:27 EST)
• [PATCH] fix for idiocy in mount_root cleanups. Alexander Viro (Sat Dec 08 2001 - 06:40:49 EST)
  • Re: [PATCH] fix for idiocy in mount_root cleanups. Linus Torvalds (Sat Dec 08 2001 - 13:00:00 EST)
    • Re: [PATCH] fix for idiocy in mount_root cleanups. Alexander Viro (Sat Dec 08 2001 - 15:42:18 EST)
    • Re: [PATCH] fix for idiocy in mount_root cleanups. Alexander Viro (Sat Dec 08 2001 - 16:04:59 EST)
      • Re: [PATCH] fix for idiocy in mount_root cleanups. Pavel Machek (Sun Dec 09 2001 - 17:58:50 EST)
      • Re: [PATCH] fix for idiocy in mount_root cleanups. Pavel Machek (Sun Dec 09 2001 - 17:56:22 EST)
      • Re: [PATCH] fix for idiocy in mount_root cleanups. Alexander Viro (Mon Dec 10 2001 - 06:36:15 EST)
• Re: [RFC][PATCH] 2.5.0 Multi-Queue Scheduler Alan Cox (Sat Dec 08 2001 - 06:58:22 EST)
  • Re: [RFC][PATCH] 2.5.0 Multi-Queue Scheduler Davide Libenzi (Sat Dec 08 2001 - 18:42:19 EST)
  • Re: [RFC][PATCH] 2.5.0 Multi-Queue Scheduler Mike Kravetz (Sun Dec 09 2001 - 17:31:52 EST)
    • Re: [RFC][PATCH] 2.5.0 Multi-Queue Scheduler Alan Cox (Sun Dec 09 2001 - 18:51:20 EST)
      • Re: [RFC][PATCH] 2.5.0 Multi-Queue Scheduler Mike Kravetz (Sun Dec 09 2001 - 17:53:52 EST)
      • Re: [RFC][PATCH] 2.5.0 Multi-Queue Scheduler Alan Cox (Sun Dec 09 2001 - 19:10:53 EST)
• PROBLEM: reading at the end of block device fails Sakari Ailus (Sat Dec 08 2001 - 07:09:17 EST)
• SMP 440GX+ hang on boot (2.4.16) Jeff Gustafson (Sat Dec 08 2001 - 07:21:47 EST)
  • Re: SMP 440GX+ hang on boot (2.4.16) Alan Cox (Sat Dec 08 2001 - 10:28:29 EST)
    • Re: SMP 440GX+ hang on boot (2.4.16) Jeff Gustafson (Sat Dec 08 2001 - 21:22:42 EST)
  • Re: SMP 440GX+ hang on boot (2.4.16) arjan@fenrus.demon.nl (Sat Dec 08 2001 - 10:37:45 EST)
    • Re: SMP 440GX+ hang on boot (2.4.16) Jeff Gustafson (Sat Dec 08 2001 - 21:22:44 EST)
• Bad EIP value on 2.4.16 Rob Fulton (Sat Dec 08 2001 - 07:25:55 EST)
  • Re: Bad EIP value on 2.4.16 James Stevenson (Sat Dec 08 2001 - 08:20:55 EST)
    • Re: Bad EIP value on 2.4.16 Dave Jones (Sat Dec 08 2001 - 08:51:46 EST)
• Re: Slight Return (was Re: [VM] 2.4.14/15-pre4 too "swap-happy"?) Ken Brownfield (Sat Dec 08 2001 - 08:12:59 EST)
  • Re: Slight Return (was Re: [VM] 2.4.14/15-pre4 too "swap-happy"?) Marcelo Tosatti (Sun Dec 09 2001 - 13:51:14 EST)
    • Re: Slight Return (was Re: [VM] 2.4.14/15-pre4 too "swap-happy"?) Ken Brownfield (Mon Dec 10 2001 - 01:56:41 EST)
• [2.5.1-pre7] VFS: Cannot open root device "341" or 03:41 Sebastian Dröge (Sat Dec 08 2001 - 08:15:17 EST)
  • [FIX] Re: [2.5.1-pre7] VFS: Cannot open root device "341" or 03:41 Alexander Viro (Sat Dec 08 2001 - 08:27:32 EST)
• [CFT][PATCH] next bunch of cleanups - initrd and friends Alexander Viro (Sat Dec 08 2001 - 08:26:27 EST)
• [PATCH] Making vmlinux Multiboot compliant and grub capable of loading modules at boot time. (1 Part) Christian Koenig (Sat Dec 08 2001 - 08:59:18 EST)
  • Re: [PATCH] Making vmlinux Multiboot compliant and grub capable of loading modules at boot time. (1 Part) Richard Todd (Sun Dec 09 2001 - 20:51:14 EST)
    • Re: [PATCH] Making vmlinux Multiboot compliant and grub capable of loading modules at boot time. (1 Part) Christian Koenig (Sun Dec 09 2001 - 17:17:18 EST)
• [PATCH] Making vmlinux Multiboot compliant and grub capable of loading modules at boot time. (2 Part) Christian Koenig (Sat Dec 08 2001 - 08:59:23 EST)
• Re: [PATCH][RFC] Allow drivers/scsi/imm.c to compile in 2.5.1pre6 Jens Axboe (Sat Dec 08 2001 - 09:02:27 EST)
  • Re: [PATCH][RFC] Allow drivers/scsi/imm.c to compile in 2.5.1pre6 Jens Axboe (Sat Dec 08 2001 - 09:06:38 EST)
• IGNORE, please ignore, testing PANTELIS PROIOS (Sat Dec 08 2001 - 09:27:28 EST)
• 119.5% CPU load brain@artax.karlin.mff.cuni.cz (Sat Dec 08 2001 - 10:43:30 EST)
  • Re: 119.5% CPU load Ken Brownfield (Sat Dec 08 2001 - 10:40:37 EST)
  • Re: 119.5% CPU load William Park (Sat Dec 08 2001 - 12:18:17 EST)
  • Re: 119.5% CPU load Samium Gromoff (Sat Dec 08 2001 - 15:37:49 EST)
  • Re: 119.5% CPU load Pavel Machek (Sun Dec 09 2001 - 06:39:19 EST)
• [problem] a bit OT: kernel 2.4.13 complains about E2FS utils trying to write pas PANTELIS PROIOS (Sat Dec 08 2001 - 09:47:00 EST)
• Re: [Lse-tech] [RFC] [PATCH] Scalable Statistics Counters Anton Blanchard (Sat Dec 08 2001 - 08:46:22 EST)
  • Re: [Lse-tech] [RFC] [PATCH] Scalable Statistics Counters Niels Christiansen (Sat Dec 08 2001 - 12:43:22 EST)
    • Re: [Lse-tech] [RFC] [PATCH] Scalable Statistics Counters Anton Blanchard (Sun Dec 09 2001 - 06:46:13 EST)
  • Re: [Lse-tech] [RFC] [PATCH] Scalable Statistics Counters Paul Jackson (Sat Dec 08 2001 - 17:24:36 EST)
    • Re: [Lse-tech] [RFC] [PATCH] Scalable Statistics Counters Jack Steiner (Sat Dec 08 2001 - 22:46:15 EST)
      • Re: [Lse-tech] [RFC] [PATCH] Scalable Statistics Counters Paul Jackson (Sat Dec 08 2001 - 23:44:37 EST)
      • Re: [Lse-tech] [RFC] [PATCH] Scalable Statistics Counters Jack Steiner (Sun Dec 09 2001 - 12:34:43 EST)
      • Re: [Lse-tech] [RFC] [PATCH] Scalable Statistics Counters Paul Jackson (Tue Dec 11 2001 - 18:27:35 EST)
  • Re: [Lse-tech] [RFC] [PATCH] Scalable Statistics Counters Manfred Spraul (Sun Dec 09 2001 - 05:57:55 EST)
    • Re: [Lse-tech] [RFC] [PATCH] Scalable Statistics Counters Jack Steiner (Mon Dec 10 2001 - 11:32:59 EST)
      • Re: [Lse-tech] [RFC] [PATCH] Scalable Statistics Counters Manfred Spraul (Mon Dec 10 2001 - 12:00:22 EST)
• Memory Interleave + kernel + VIA chipsets == possible ? Pantelis Proios (Sat Dec 08 2001 - 10:02:55 EST)
  • Re: Memory Interleave + kernel + VIA chipsets == possible ? Alan Cox (Sat Dec 08 2001 - 10:35:44 EST)
  • Re: Memory Interleave + kernel + VIA chipsets == possible ? arjan@fenrus.demon.nl (Sat Dec 08 2001 - 10:33:41 EST)
  • Re: Memory Interleave + kernel + VIA chipsets == possible ? Ivanovich (Sat Dec 08 2001 - 10:55:57 EST)
    • Re: Memory Interleave + kernel + VIA chipsets == possible ? Ivanovich (Sat Dec 08 2001 - 11:27:42 EST)
• 2.4.16 memory badness (reproducible) Leigh Orf (Sat Dec 08 2001 - 10:39:14 EST)
  • Re: 2.4.16 memory badness (reproducible) Ken Brownfield (Sat Dec 08 2001 - 10:56:20 EST)
    • Re: 2.4.16 memory badness (reproducible) Leigh Orf (Sat Dec 08 2001 - 13:54:17 EST)
      • Re: 2.4.16 memory badness (reproducible) Andrew Morton (Sat Dec 08 2001 - 14:41:22 EST)
      • Re: 2.4.16 memory badness (reproducible) Leigh Orf (Sat Dec 08 2001 - 15:04:40 EST)
      • Re: 2.4.16 memory badness (reproducible) Leigh Orf (Sat Dec 08 2001 - 16:42:10 EST)
      • Re: 2.4.16 memory badness (reproducible) Leigh Orf (Sat Dec 08 2001 - 17:24:25 EST)
      • Re: 2.4.16 memory badness (reproducible) Hugh Dickins (Tue Dec 11 2001 - 14:07:41 EST)
      • Re: 2.4.16 memory badness (reproducible) Stephan von Krawczynski (Tue Dec 11 2001 - 15:04:12 EST)
      • Re: 2.4.16 memory badness (reproducible) H. Peter Anvin (Tue Dec 11 2001 - 17:13:35 EST)
      • Re: 2.4.16 memory badness (reproducible) Andrea Arcangeli (Tue Dec 11 2001 - 17:59:08 EST)
      • Re: 2.4.16 memory badness (reproducible) Leigh Orf (Wed Dec 12 2001 - 09:51:00 EST)
• 2.5.1-pre7 ide-cd module Pierre Rousselet (Sat Dec 08 2001 - 10:46:12 EST)
  • Re: 2.5.1-pre7 ide-cd module Jens Axboe (Sat Dec 08 2001 - 11:18:47 EST)
    • Re: 2.5.1-pre7 ide-cd module Pierre Rousselet (Sat Dec 08 2001 - 11:38:52 EST)
      • Re: 2.5.1-pre7 ide-cd module Jens Axboe (Sat Dec 08 2001 - 11:45:52 EST)
      • Re: 2.5.1-pre7 ide-cd module Pierre Rousselet (Sat Dec 08 2001 - 11:48:55 EST)
      • Re: 2.5.1-pre7 ide-cd module Jens Axboe (Sat Dec 08 2001 - 11:54:00 EST)
      • Re: 2.5.1-pre7 ide-cd module Pierre Rousselet (Sat Dec 08 2001 - 12:32:49 EST)
    • Re: 2.5.1-pre7 ide-cd module Udo A. Steinberg (Sat Dec 08 2001 - 14:12:52 EST)
      • Re: 2.5.1-pre7 ide-cd module Jens Axboe (Sat Dec 08 2001 - 14:15:15 EST)
      • Re: 2.5.1-pre7 ide-cd module Udo A. Steinberg (Sat Dec 08 2001 - 14:28:33 EST)
      • Re: 2.5.1-pre7 ide-cd module Jens Axboe (Sat Dec 08 2001 - 14:44:03 EST)
      • Re: 2.5.1-pre7 ide-cd module Udo A. Steinberg (Sat Dec 08 2001 - 14:53:23 EST)
• Re: horrible disk thorughput on itanium Padraig Brady (Sat Dec 08 2001 - 11:29:35 EST)
  • Re: horrible disk thorughput on itanium Kurt Garloff (Sun Dec 09 2001 - 18:13:23 EST)
• The best VM algorithm for Linux Martin Devera (Sat Dec 08 2001 - 11:36:26 EST)
• 2.4.14/16 load reboots Jerrad Pierce (Sat Dec 08 2001 - 11:44:28 EST)
  • Re: 2.4.14/16 load reboots Jerrad Pierce (Sat Dec 08 2001 - 15:22:27 EST)
    • Re: 2.4.14/16 load reboots Keith Owens (Sat Dec 08 2001 - 21:11:10 EST)
  • Re: 2.4.14/16 load reboots Alan Cox (Sat Dec 08 2001 - 15:47:30 EST)
    • Re: 2.4.14/16 load reboots Trever L. Adams (Sat Dec 08 2001 - 22:46:40 EST)
      • Re: 2.4.14/16 load reboots Alan Cox (Sun Dec 09 2001 - 11:26:43 EST)
      • Re: 2.4.14/16 load reboots Trever L. Adams (Mon Dec 10 2001 - 09:43:39 EST)
    • Re: 2.4.14/16 load reboots Jerrad Pierce (Sat Dec 08 2001 - 23:19:55 EST)
    • Re: 2.4.14/16 load reboots Dave Cinege (Tue Dec 11 2001 - 02:01:09 EST)
  • Re: 2.4.14/16 load reboots Willy Tarreau (Sat Dec 08 2001 - 16:00:21 EST)
    • Re: 2.4.14/16 load reboots Jerrad Pierce (Sat Dec 08 2001 - 17:01:47 EST)
• 2.4.x kernel and E2FS utils woes Pantelis Proios (Sat Dec 08 2001 - 12:10:06 EST)
• ymfpci bugfix Pete Zaitcev (Sat Dec 08 2001 - 12:13:36 EST)
• Re: Linux/Pro -- clusters Andries.Brouwer@cwi.nl (Sat Dec 08 2001 - 12:26:55 EST)
  • Re: Linux/Pro -- clusters Linus Torvalds (Sat Dec 08 2001 - 23:22:54 EST)
    • Re: Linux/Pro -- clusters Alexander Viro (Sun Dec 09 2001 - 00:49:45 EST)
  • Re: Linux/Pro -- clusters Andries.Brouwer@cwi.nl (Sun Dec 09 2001 - 03:59:21 EST)
    • Re: Linux/Pro -- clusters Alexander Viro (Mon Dec 10 2001 - 11:49:36 EST)
      • Re: Linux/Pro -- clusters Alan Cox (Mon Dec 10 2001 - 12:09:43 EST)
      • Re: Linux/Pro -- clusters Albert D. Cahalan (Tue Dec 11 2001 - 03:39:15 EST)
  • Re: Linux/Pro -- clusters Andries.Brouwer@cwi.nl (Mon Dec 10 2001 - 14:36:14 EST)
    • Re: Linux/Pro -- clusters Alexander Viro (Mon Dec 10 2001 - 17:55:28 EST)
  • Re: Linux/Pro -- clusters Andries.Brouwer@cwi.nl (Mon Dec 10 2001 - 14:51:39 EST)
    • Re: Linux/Pro -- clusters Alan Cox (Mon Dec 10 2001 - 15:34:24 EST)
  • Re: Linux/Pro -- clusters Andries.Brouwer@cwi.nl (Mon Dec 10 2001 - 16:31:23 EST)
    • Re: Linux/Pro -- clusters Alan Cox (Mon Dec 10 2001 - 16:44:53 EST)
  • Re: Linux/Pro -- clusters Andries.Brouwer@cwi.nl (Mon Dec 10 2001 - 17:48:17 EST)
  • Re: Linux/Pro -- clusters Andries.Brouwer@cwi.nl (Mon Dec 10 2001 - 18:33:41 EST)
• es1371 & joystick Jonathan Isom (Sat Dec 08 2001 - 12:44:11 EST)
  • Re: es1371 & joystick Vojtech Pavlik (Sat Dec 08 2001 - 16:34:57 EST)
• Re: 2.4.15 and GNU 3.0.2 Heinz Diehl (Sat Dec 08 2001 - 12:38:32 EST)
• fstat issues James Moss (Sat Dec 08 2001 - 13:17:04 EST)
• Typedefs / gcc / HIGHMEM Stephan von Krawczynski (Sat Dec 08 2001 - 13:38:00 EST)
  • Re: Typedefs / gcc / HIGHMEM H. Peter Anvin (Sat Dec 08 2001 - 18:40:24 EST)
    • Re: Typedefs / gcc / HIGHMEM Stephan von Krawczynski (Sat Dec 08 2001 - 19:39:03 EST)
      • Re: Typedefs / gcc / HIGHMEM H. Peter Anvin (Sat Dec 08 2001 - 19:41:56 EST)
      • Re: Typedefs / gcc / HIGHMEM [MOc]cda*mirabilos (Sat Dec 08 2001 - 19:55:38 EST)
      • Re: Typedefs / gcc / HIGHMEM H. Peter Anvin (Sat Dec 08 2001 - 20:09:55 EST)
      • Re: Typedefs / gcc / HIGHMEM [MOc]cda*mirabilos (Sat Dec 08 2001 - 19:48:17 EST)
  • Re: Typedefs / gcc / HIGHMEM RaúlNúñez de Arenas Coronado (Sun Dec 09 2001 - 04:31:07 EST)
• how to set motherboard chipset registers Chris Friesen (Fri Dec 07 2001 - 13:53:03 EST)
  • Re: how to set motherboard chipset registers Dave Jones (Sat Dec 08 2001 - 14:05:45 EST)
  • Re: how to set motherboard chipset registers Calin A. Culianu (Sat Dec 08 2001 - 14:06:06 EST)
• Impact of HIGHMEM? war (Sat Dec 08 2001 - 14:03:26 EST)
  • Re: Impact of HIGHMEM? Ivanovich (Sat Dec 08 2001 - 14:57:54 EST)
    • Re: Impact of HIGHMEM? Jens Axboe (Sat Dec 08 2001 - 15:05:29 EST)
      • Re: Impact of HIGHMEM? Ivanovich (Sat Dec 08 2001 - 18:30:51 EST)
• 2.4.17-pre4/5 card services oops pHilipp Zabel (Sat Dec 08 2001 - 14:00:20 EST)
  • Re: 2.4.17-pre4/5 card services oops pHilipp Zabel (Sat Dec 08 2001 - 18:51:06 EST)
    • 2.5.1pre7 vt_kern.h small patch, take 3 Kirk Reiser (Sat Dec 08 2001 - 19:02:32 EST)
• Re: CBQ and all other qdiscs now REALLY completely documented (almost!) jamal (Sat Dec 08 2001 - 14:20:20 EST)
  • further CBQ/tc documentation ds9a.nl/lartc/manpages bert hubert (Sat Dec 08 2001 - 14:55:41 EST)
    • Re: further CBQ/tc documentation ds9a.nl/lartc/manpages jamal (Sat Dec 08 2001 - 15:43:05 EST)
  • Re: CBQ and all other qdiscs now REALLY completely documented (almost!) bert hubert (Sat Dec 08 2001 - 18:23:44 EST)
    • Re: CBQ and all other qdiscs now REALLY completely documented (almost!) jamal (Sat Dec 08 2001 - 20:14:10 EST)
      • Re: CBQ and all other qdiscs now REALLY completely documented (almost!) bert hubert (Sat Dec 08 2001 - 20:30:29 EST)
      • Re: CBQ and all other qdiscs now REALLY completely documented (almost!) jamal (Sat Dec 08 2001 - 21:10:41 EST)
      • Re: CBQ and all other qdiscs now REALLY completely documented kuznet@ms2.inr.ac.ru (Sun Dec 09 2001 - 13:14:46 EST)
      • Re: CBQ and all other qdiscs now REALLY completely documented bert hubert (Sun Dec 09 2001 - 13:18:05 EST)
      • Re: CBQ and all other qdiscs now REALLY completely documented jamal (Sun Dec 09 2001 - 16:45:01 EST)
      • Re: CBQ and all other qdiscs now REALLY completely documented bert hubert (Sun Dec 09 2001 - 16:53:50 EST)
      • Re: CBQ and all other qdiscs now REALLY completely documented jamal (Sun Dec 09 2001 - 17:07:03 EST)
      • Re: CBQ and all other qdiscs now REALLY completely documented bert hubert (Sun Dec 09 2001 - 17:13:40 EST)
      • Re: CBQ and all other qdiscs now REALLY completely documented jamal (Sun Dec 09 2001 - 19:58:40 EST)
      • Re: CBQ and all other qdiscs now REALLY completely documented kuznet@ms2.inr.ac.ru (Mon Dec 10 2001 - 12:04:16 EST)
      • CBQ MANPAGE: I hear the theme of '2001, A Space Odyssey' bert hubert (Sun Dec 09 2001 - 19:41:30 EST)
      • Re: CBQ MANPAGE: I hear the theme of '2001, A Space Odyssey' jamal (Sun Dec 09 2001 - 20:04:42 EST)
      • Re: CBQ MANPAGE: I hear the theme of '2001, A Space Odyssey' bert hubert (Sun Dec 09 2001 - 20:12:00 EST)
• Re: making an ide hd sleep Pavel Machek (Fri Dec 07 2001 - 15:37:08 EST)
• suspend-to-ram on athlons Pavel Machek (Fri Dec 07 2001 - 16:01:30 EST)
• Re: Kernel freezing.... Pavel Machek (Fri Dec 07 2001 - 12:34:42 EST)
  • Re: Kernel freezing.... Mike Castle (Sat Dec 08 2001 - 16:12:23 EST)
  • Re: Kernel freezing.... jcassidy@mcs.kent.edu (Sat Dec 08 2001 - 18:21:04 EST)
• Cheap P3 Xeon... Any quad motherboard? William Park (Sat Dec 08 2001 - 16:00:18 EST)
  • Re: Cheap P3 Xeon... Any quad motherboard? (cancelled) William Park (Sat Dec 08 2001 - 18:05:05 EST)
• Re: IRQ Routing Problem on ALi Chipset Laptop (HP Pavilion N5425) Pavel Machek (Fri Dec 07 2001 - 15:33:13 EST)
  • Re: IRQ Routing Problem on ALi Chipset Laptop (HP Pavilion N5425) Cory Bell (Sun Dec 09 2001 - 00:37:31 EST)
    • Re: IRQ Routing Problem on ALi Chipset Laptop (HP Pavilion N5425) Pavel Machek (Sun Dec 09 2001 - 08:13:33 EST)
      • Re: IRQ Routing Problem on ALi Chipset Laptop (HP Pavilion N5425) John Clemens (Mon Dec 10 2001 - 10:26:20 EST)
      • Re: IRQ Routing Problem on ALi Chipset Laptop (HP Pavilion N5425) Pavel Machek (Mon Dec 10 2001 - 11:04:06 EST)
      • Re: IRQ Routing Problem on ALi Chipset Laptop (HP Pavilion N5425) John Clemens (Mon Dec 10 2001 - 12:53:28 EST)
      • Re: IRQ Routing Problem on ALi Chipset Laptop (HP Pavilion N5425) Cory Bell (Mon Dec 10 2001 - 20:53:03 EST)
      • Re: IRQ Routing Problem on ALi Chipset Laptop (HP Pavilion N5425) Pavel Machek (Tue Dec 11 2001 - 04:45:46 EST)
      • Re: IRQ Routing Problem on ALi Chipset Laptop (HP Pavilion N5425) Pavel Machek (Mon Dec 10 2001 - 13:32:32 EST)
      • Re: IRQ Routing Problem on ALi Chipset Laptop (HP Pavilion N5425) Cory Bell (Mon Dec 10 2001 - 15:56:00 EST)
    • Re: IRQ Routing Problem on ALi Chipset Laptop (HP Pavilion N5425) Pavel Machek (Mon Dec 10 2001 - 11:01:47 EST)
      • Re: IRQ Routing Problem on ALi Chipset Laptop (HP Pavilion N5425) Cory Bell (Mon Dec 10 2001 - 16:24:48 EST)
      • Re: IRQ Routing Problem on ALi Chipset Laptop (HP Pavilion N5425) Pavel Machek (Tue Dec 11 2001 - 05:02:17 EST)
    • Re: IRQ Routing Problem on ALi Chipset Laptop (HP Pavilion N5425) Pavel Machek (Tue Dec 11 2001 - 05:14:58 EST)
      • Re: IRQ Routing Problem on ALi Chipset Laptop (HP Pavilion N5425) Cory Bell (Tue Dec 11 2001 - 10:19:21 EST)
      • Re: IRQ Routing Problem on ALi Chipset Laptop (HP Pavilion N5425) Pavel Machek (Tue Dec 11 2001 - 10:36:41 EST)
      • Re: IRQ Routing Problem on ALi Chipset Laptop (HP Pavilion N5425) Cory Bell (Tue Dec 11 2001 - 12:08:58 EST)
  • Re: IRQ Routing Problem on ALi Chipset Laptop (HP Pavilion N5425) Pavel Machek (Sat Dec 08 2001 - 18:04:52 EST)
    • Re: IRQ Routing Problem on ALi Chipset Laptop (HP Pavilion N5425) Cory Bell (Sun Dec 09 2001 - 15:02:44 EST)
  • Re: IRQ Routing Problem on ALi Chipset Laptop (HP Pavilion N5425) Pavel Machek (Sat Dec 08 2001 - 17:38:17 EST)
• ext3 writeback mode slower than ordered mode? Zlatko Calusic (Sat Dec 08 2001 - 16:10:00 EST)
  • Re: ext3 writeback mode slower than ordered mode? Jan H. Schrewe (Sat Dec 08 2001 - 16:57:56 EST)
  • Re: ext3 writeback mode slower than ordered mode? Andrew Morton (Sat Dec 08 2001 - 20:59:24 EST)
    • Re: ext3 writeback mode slower than ordered mode? Juan Piernas Canovas (Sun Dec 09 2001 - 07:58:50 EST)
    • Re: ext3 writeback mode slower than ordered mode? Zlatko Calusic (Sun Dec 09 2001 - 14:46:02 EST)
      • Re: ext3 writeback mode slower than ordered mode? Stephen C. Tweedie (Mon Dec 10 2001 - 13:18:09 EST)
      • Re: ext3 writeback mode slower than ordered mode? Zlatko Calusic (Tue Dec 11 2001 - 17:31:22 EST)
• porting howto for 2.5? Peter T. Breuer (Sat Dec 08 2001 - 16:26:48 EST)
  • Re: porting howto for 2.5? Randy.Dunlap (Tue Dec 11 2001 - 18:57:53 EST)
• software raid issues -- possible kernel I/O problem? Chris Friesen (Fri Dec 07 2001 - 16:33:01 EST)
  • Re: software raid issues -- possible kernel I/O problem? Chris Friesen (Fri Dec 07 2001 - 17:39:53 EST)
    • Re: software raid issues -- possible kernel I/O problem? Jakob Østergaard (Sun Dec 09 2001 - 14:19:00 EST)
  • Re: software raid issues -- possible kernel I/O problem? Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk (Sun Dec 09 2001 - 14:32:57 EST)
• SCSI???? Miguel Maria Godinho de Matos (Sat Dec 08 2001 - 17:13:59 EST)
  • Re: SCSI???? Alan Cox (Sat Dec 08 2001 - 17:28:01 EST)
  • Re: SCSI???? Miguel Maria Godinho de Matos (Sun Dec 09 2001 - 08:18:26 EST)
    • Re: SCSI???? Oliver Xymoron (Mon Dec 10 2001 - 11:31:08 EST)
• depmod skidley (Sat Dec 08 2001 - 18:16:17 EST)
  • Re: depmod Francois Romieu (Sun Dec 09 2001 - 09:09:22 EST)
• APM woes: IBM T20 Thinkpad Alex Hudson (Sat Dec 08 2001 - 18:20:34 EST)
  • Re: APM woes: IBM T20 Thinkpad Alex Bligh - linux-kernel (Sun Dec 09 2001 - 13:54:20 EST)
  • Re: APM woes: IBM T20 Thinkpad Thomas Hood (Sun Dec 09 2001 - 18:06:10 EST)
• [CFT] tree-based bootmem William Lee Irwin III (Sat Dec 08 2001 - 18:40:21 EST)
  • Re: [CFT] tree-based bootmem Robert Love (Sun Dec 09 2001 - 18:29:26 EST)
    • Re: [CFT] tree-based bootmem William Lee Irwin III (Sun Dec 09 2001 - 20:08:29 EST)
• Re: rp_filter and iptables Rusty Russell (Sat Dec 08 2001 - 06:04:17 EST)
• Re: [PATCH] BUG_ON() not arch-specific. Rusty Russell (Sat Dec 08 2001 - 18:56:43 EST)
• 2.4.16: Bizarre TCP throughput problems Dave Carrigan (Sat Dec 08 2001 - 19:08:45 EST)
  • Re: 2.4.16: Bizarre TCP throughput problems Manfred Spraul (Sun Dec 09 2001 - 05:20:26 EST)
    • Re: 2.4.16: Bizarre TCP throughput problems Dave Carrigan (Sun Dec 09 2001 - 16:16:26 EST)
• Re: IDE SeekComplete Error Andre Hedrick (Sat Dec 08 2001 - 19:44:02 EST)
• Required Swap for recent 2.4 kernels? Quim K. Holland (Sat Dec 08 2001 - 20:09:33 EST)
  • Re: Required Swap for recent 2.4 kernels? Alan Cox (Sat Dec 08 2001 - 20:31:50 EST)
• [OT] fputc vs putc Re: horrible disk thorughput on itanium Tom Vier (Sat Dec 08 2001 - 20:19:07 EST)
  • Re: [OT] fputc vs putc Re: horrible disk thorughput on itanium Eric W. Biederman (Sat Dec 08 2001 - 20:33:38 EST)
    • Re: [OT] fputc vs putc Re: horrible disk thorughput on itanium H. Peter Anvin (Sun Dec 09 2001 - 04:27:51 EST)
      • Re: [OT] fputc vs putc Re: horrible disk thorughput on itanium Tom Vier (Sun Dec 09 2001 - 14:14:08 EST)
      • Re: [OT] fputc vs putc Re: horrible disk thorughput on itanium H. Peter Anvin (Sun Dec 09 2001 - 17:15:22 EST)
• (Patch) Please name parameters in function declarations Adam J. Richter (Sat Dec 08 2001 - 21:12:18 EST)
• PATCH: BSD-style credentials for Linux 2.5.0-pre6... Trond Myklebust (Sat Dec 08 2001 - 21:19:35 EST)
• DMA failure to pages w/ addr under 64meg volodya@mindspring.com (Sat Dec 08 2001 - 21:33:57 EST)
• Re: device video0 YH (Sat Dec 08 2001 - 21:53:27 EST)
• Re: devfs unable to handle permission: 2.4.17-pre[4,5] /ALSA-0.9.0beta[9,10] Richard Gooch (Sat Dec 08 2001 - 22:08:23 EST)
  • Re: devfs unable to handle permission: 2.4.17-pre[4,5] /ALSA-0.9.0beta[9,10] Roman Zippel (Sat Dec 08 2001 - 23:02:49 EST)
    • Re: devfs unable to handle permission: 2.4.17-pre[4,5] /ALSA-0.9.0beta[9,10] Richard Gooch (Sat Dec 08 2001 - 23:48:37 EST)
      • Re: devfs unable to handle permission: 2.4.17-pre[4,5] /ALSA-0.9.0beta[9,10] Roman Zippel (Sun Dec 09 2001 - 09:44:38 EST)
      • Re: devfs unable to handle permission: 2.4.17-pre[4,5] /ALSA-0.9.0beta[9,10] Marcelo Tosatti (Sun Dec 09 2001 - 14:45:36 EST)
      • Re: devfs unable to handle permission: 2.4.17-pre[4,5] /ALSA-0.9.0beta[9,10] Richard Gooch (Sun Dec 09 2001 - 16:26:35 EST)
      • Re: devfs unable to handle permission: 2.4.17-pre[4,5] /ALSA-0.9.0beta[9,10] Roman Zippel (Sun Dec 09 2001 - 17:26:50 EST)
      • Re: devfs unable to handle permission: 2.4.17-pre[4,5] /ALSA-0.9.0beta[9,10] Marcelo Tosatti (Sun Dec 09 2001 - 16:20:05 EST)
      • Re: devfs unable to handle permission: 2.4.17-pre[4,5] /ALSA-0.9.0beta[9,10] Richard Gooch (Sun Dec 09 2001 - 19:11:37 EST)
      • Re: devfs unable to handle permission: 2.4.17-pre[4,5] /ALSA-0.9.0beta[9,10] Marcelo Tosatti (Sun Dec 09 2001 - 18:00:59 EST)
      • Re: devfs unable to handle permission: 2.4.17-pre[4,5] /ALSA-0.9.0beta[9,10] Marcelo Tosatti (Sun Dec 09 2001 - 18:03:10 EST)
  • Re: devfs unable to handle permission: 2.4.17-pre[4,5] /ALSA-0.9.0beta[9,10] Borsenkow Andrej (Mon Dec 10 2001 - 02:04:55 EST)
    • Re: devfs unable to handle permission: 2.4.17-pre[4,5] /ALSA-0.9.0beta[9,10] Roman Zippel (Mon Dec 10 2001 - 05:46:29 EST)
• PATCH: linux-2.5.1-pre7/drivers/block/xd.c compilation fix (version 2) Adam J. Richter (Sat Dec 08 2001 - 23:42:25 EST)
  • Re: PATCH: linux-2.5.1-pre7/drivers/block/xd.c compilation fix (version 2) Linus Torvalds (Sat Dec 08 2001 - 23:59:02 EST)
    • Re: PATCH: linux-2.5.1-pre7/drivers/block/xd.c compilation fix (version 2) Andrzej Krzysztofowicz (Sun Dec 09 2001 - 13:08:37 EST)
  • Re: PATCH: linux-2.5.1-pre7/drivers/block/xd.c compilation fix (version 2) Adam J. Richter (Sun Dec 09 2001 - 01:06:57 EST)
    • Re: PATCH: linux-2.5.1-pre7/drivers/block/xd.c compilation fix (version 2) Keith Owens (Sun Dec 09 2001 - 02:00:20 EST)
• Patch(?): linux-2.5.1-pre7/drivers/block/DAC960.c compilation fixes Adam J. Richter (Sun Dec 09 2001 - 00:12:32 EST)
  • Re: Patch(?): linux-2.5.1-pre7/drivers/block/DAC960.c compilation fixes Jens Axboe (Sun Dec 09 2001 - 06:36:13 EST)
• user-mode port 0.53-2.4.16 Jeff Dike (Sun Dec 09 2001 - 01:38:51 EST)
• Devfs races with block devices Richard Gooch (Sun Dec 09 2001 - 00:38:04 EST)
• Re: Kernel 2.4.x problem Paul Dickson (Sun Dec 09 2001 - 02:18:24 EST)
• Re: Oops on 2.5.1-pre6 doing mkreiserfs on loop device rwhron@earthlink.net (Sun Dec 09 2001 - 03:07:29 EST)
  • Re: Oops on 2.5.1-pre6 doing mkreiserfs on loop device Jens Axboe (Sun Dec 09 2001 - 03:57:33 EST)
• CML2 1.9.6 is available Eric S. Raymond (Sun Dec 09 2001 - 03:32:49 EST)
  • Re: CML2 1.9.6 is available Keith Owens (Sun Dec 09 2001 - 04:04:20 EST)
    • Re: CML2 1.9.6 is available Eric S. Raymond (Wed Dec 12 2001 - 00:05:06 EST)
      • Re: CML2 1.9.6 is available Keith Owens (Wed Dec 12 2001 - 01:32:05 EST)
      • Re: CML2 1.9.6 is available Eric S. Raymond (Wed Dec 12 2001 - 01:28:46 EST)
      • Re: CML2 1.9.6 is available Lars Brinkhoff (Wed Dec 12 2001 - 06:45:53 EST)
      • Re: CML2 1.9.6 is available Eric S. Raymond (Wed Dec 12 2001 - 11:04:11 EST)
• Linux/i386 boot protocol version 2.03 H. Peter Anvin (Sun Dec 09 2001 - 04:22:07 EST)
  • Re: Linux/i386 boot protocol version 2.03 Eric W. Biederman (Sun Dec 09 2001 - 13:29:33 EST)
    • Re: Linux/i386 boot protocol version 2.03 H. Peter Anvin (Sun Dec 09 2001 - 16:53:12 EST)
      • Re: Linux/i386 boot protocol version 2.03 Eric W. Biederman (Sun Dec 09 2001 - 17:20:56 EST)
      • Re: Linux/i386 boot protocol version 2.03 H. Peter Anvin (Sun Dec 09 2001 - 18:13:37 EST)
      • Re: Linux/i386 boot protocol version 2.03 Eric W. Biederman (Sun Dec 09 2001 - 18:18:24 EST)
    • Re: Linux/i386 boot protocol version 2.03 H. Peter Anvin (Sun Dec 09 2001 - 16:56:05 EST)
• Comments on 2.4.17-pre5 and ATYFB Zwane Mwaikambo (Sun Dec 09 2001 - 04:27:59 EST)
• OOPS: 2.5.1-pre8 - cdrecord + ide_scsi Carl Ritson (Sun Dec 09 2001 - 04:26:19 EST)
  • Re: OOPS: 2.5.1-pre8 - cdrecord + ide_scsi Jens Axboe (Sun Dec 09 2001 - 05:22:08 EST)
    • Re: OOPS: 2.5.1-pre8 - cdrecord + ide_scsi Jens Axboe (Sun Dec 09 2001 - 05:31:04 EST)
      • Re: OOPS: 2.5.1-pre8 - cdrecord + ide_scsi Carl Ritson (Sun Dec 09 2001 - 08:52:32 EST)
      • Re: OOPS: 2.5.1-pre8 - cdrecord + ide_scsi Jens Axboe (Sun Dec 09 2001 - 08:58:25 EST)
      • Re: OOPS: 2.5.1-pre8 - cdrecord + ide_scsi Carl Ritson (Sun Dec 09 2001 - 10:35:14 EST)
      • Re: OOPS: 2.5.1-pre8 - cdrecord + ide_scsi Jens Axboe (Sun Dec 09 2001 - 10:38:20 EST)
      • Re: OOPS: 2.5.1-pre8 - cdrecord + ide_scsi Jens Axboe (Tue Dec 11 2001 - 09:28:31 EST)
      • Re: OOPS: 2.5.1-pre8 - cdrecord + ide_scsi Carl Ritson (Wed Dec 12 2001 - 03:02:05 EST)
      • Re: OOPS: 2.5.1-pre8 - cdrecord + ide_scsi Jens Axboe (Wed Dec 12 2001 - 04:38:52 EST)
      • Re: OOPS: 2.5.1-pre8 - cdrecord + ide_scsi Andre Hedrick (Fri Dec 14 2001 - 19:06:16 EST)
      • Re: OOPS: 2.5.1-pre8 - cdrecord + ide_scsi Jens Axboe (Sat Dec 15 2001 - 05:13:57 EST)
  • Re: OOPS: 2.5.1-pre8 - cdrecord + ide_scsi Thomas Hood (Sat Dec 15 2001 - 10:03:42 EST)
• hacking your own genitives Rick A. Hohensee (Sun Dec 09 2001 - 04:44:37 EST)
• Re: SMP/cc Cluster description Pavel Machek (Sun Dec 09 2001 - 04:24:18 EST)
• Re: Intel I860 Albert D. Cahalan (Sun Dec 09 2001 - 07:01:58 EST)
  • Re: Intel I860 Alan Cox (Sun Dec 09 2001 - 11:38:20 EST)
  • Re: Intel I860 H. Peter Anvin (Sun Dec 09 2001 - 17:03:47 EST)
• [PATCH] Power Management support for opl3sa2 Zwane Mwaikambo (Sun Dec 09 2001 - 07:34:57 EST)
  • Re: [PATCH] Power Management support for opl3sa2 Scott Murray (Sun Dec 09 2001 - 17:45:23 EST)
    • Re: [PATCH] Power Management support for opl3sa2 Zwane Mwaikambo (Mon Dec 10 2001 - 05:10:59 EST)
      • Re: [PATCH] Power Management support for opl3sa2 Stephan von Krawczynski (Mon Dec 10 2001 - 08:08:57 EST)
• [BUG] data_access_exception during chroot() Thomas Bader (Sun Dec 09 2001 - 08:16:09 EST)
• per-char IO tests Russell Coker (Sun Dec 09 2001 - 10:14:30 EST)
  • Re: per-char IO tests Chris Mason (Sun Dec 09 2001 - 10:59:45 EST)
• kmem_cache_alloc & kernel_lock Frank Cornelis (Sun Dec 09 2001 - 10:30:05 EST)
  • Re: kmem_cache_alloc & kernel_lock Ingo Molnar (Sun Dec 09 2001 - 12:43:57 EST)
  • Re: kmem_cache_alloc & kernel_lock Jens Axboe (Sun Dec 09 2001 - 10:47:21 EST)
• Re: 2.4.16 memory badness (fixed?) Leigh Orf (Sun Dec 09 2001 - 11:07:48 EST)
  • Re: 2.4.16 memory badness (fixed?) Mike Galbraith (Sun Dec 09 2001 - 12:17:11 EST)
    • Re: 2.4.16 memory badness (fixed?) Ken Brownfield (Mon Dec 10 2001 - 02:24:08 EST)
      • Re: 2.4.16 memory badness (fixed?) Rik van Riel (Mon Dec 10 2001 - 06:10:42 EST)
      • Re: 2.4.16 memory badness (fixed?) Leigh Orf (Mon Dec 10 2001 - 10:49:24 EST)
      • RE: 2.4.16 memory badness (fixed?) M. Edward Borasky (Mon Dec 10 2001 - 11:29:05 EST)
      • Re: 2.4.16 memory badness (fixed?) Helge Hafting (Wed Dec 12 2001 - 04:04:18 EST)
      • Re: 2.4.16 memory badness (fixed?) Mike Galbraith (Fri Dec 14 2001 - 17:54:57 EST)
  • Re: 2.4.16 memory badness (fixed?) Mike Galbraith (Sun Dec 09 2001 - 12:32:57 EST)
• /proc/stat and disk_io James Stevenson (Sun Dec 09 2001 - 11:19:45 EST)
  • Re: /proc/stat and disk_io Rene Rebe (Sun Dec 09 2001 - 13:04:45 EST)
  • Re: /proc/stat and disk_io Daniel Kobras (Sun Dec 09 2001 - 13:05:57 EST)
• [sparc32, 2.4.17-pre6] Wrong use of 'disable_irq' when linking kernel Alex Buell (Sun Dec 09 2001 - 11:19:31 EST)
• 2.5.1-pre8 doesn't compile w/ LVM support Richard Hoechenberger (Sun Dec 09 2001 - 11:52:21 EST)
  • Re: 2.5.1-pre8 doesn't compile w/ LVM support Jens Axboe (Sun Dec 09 2001 - 11:58:16 EST)
• Oops on 2.4.17-pre6 at boot time victor1 torres (Sun Dec 09 2001 - 13:13:17 EST)
  • Re: Oops on 2.4.17-pre6 at boot time Marcelo Tosatti (Sun Dec 09 2001 - 12:31:10 EST)
  • Re: Oops on 2.4.17-pre6 at boot time victor1 torres (Sun Dec 09 2001 - 14:02:43 EST)
  • Re: Oops on 2.4.17-pre6 at boot time victor1 torres (Sun Dec 09 2001 - 14:08:25 EST)
• 2.4.14-16: Can't see hdb or hdc on ABIT BP6 Adam C Powell IV (Sun Dec 09 2001 - 13:43:08 EST)
  • Re: 2.4.14-16: Can't see hdb or hdc on ABIT BP6 Martin Eriksson (Mon Dec 10 2001 - 03:38:06 EST)
• PNP Bios victor1 torres (Sun Dec 09 2001 - 14:07:01 EST)
  • Re: PNP Bios Thomas Hood (Sun Dec 09 2001 - 18:02:48 EST)
• Unresolved symbols (NOT A BUG) Sascha Andres (Sun Dec 09 2001 - 14:09:01 EST)
  • Re: Unresolved symbols (NOT A BUG) lk@Aniela.EU.ORG (Sun Dec 09 2001 - 16:57:40 EST)
    • RE: Unresolved symbols (NOT A BUG) Sascha Andres (Mon Dec 10 2001 - 14:59:37 EST)
• Re: 2.4.12-ac4 10Mbit NE2k interrupt load kills p166 Samium Gromoff (Sat Dec 08 2001 - 16:58:03 EST)
  • Re: 2.4.12-ac4 10Mbit NE2k interrupt load kills p166 Samium Gromoff (Sun Dec 09 2001 - 16:50:55 EST)
    • Re: 2.4.12-ac4 10Mbit NE2k interrupt load kills p166 Alan Cox (Sun Dec 09 2001 - 17:18:18 EST)
  • Re: 2.4.12-ac4 10Mbit NE2k interrupt load kills p166 Samium Gromoff (Sun Dec 09 2001 - 18:04:22 EST)
  • Re: 2.4.12-ac4 10Mbit NE2k interrupt load kills p166 vda (Mon Dec 10 2001 - 05:54:56 EST)
• [PATCH] fully preemptible kernel Robert Love (Sun Dec 09 2001 - 15:41:06 EST)
  • Re: [PATCH] fully preemptible kernel vda (Mon Dec 10 2001 - 05:54:50 EST)
    • Re: [PATCH] fully preemptible kernel Robert Love (Mon Dec 10 2001 - 02:03:53 EST)
      • Re: [PATCH] fully preemptible kernel vda (Mon Dec 10 2001 - 07:29:51 EST)
      • Re: [PATCH] fully preemptible kernel vda (Mon Dec 10 2001 - 11:08:03 EST)
      • Re: [PATCH] fully preemptible kernel vda (Mon Dec 10 2001 - 12:25:37 EST)
      • Re: [PATCH] fully preemptible kernel Wilson (Mon Dec 10 2001 - 08:55:53 EST)
• Linux 2.4.17-pre7 Marcelo Tosatti (Sun Dec 09 2001 - 14:24:14 EST)
  • Re: Linux 2.4.17-pre7 - fdomain_stub.c error Eyal Lebedinsky (Sun Dec 09 2001 - 17:14:52 EST)
    • Re: Linux 2.4.17-pre7 - fdomain_stub.c error Alan Cox (Sun Dec 09 2001 - 17:45:59 EST)
  • Re: Linux 2.4.17-pre7 Benjamin LaHaise (Sun Dec 09 2001 - 18:24:13 EST)
• PROBLEM: arcnet bugs in 2.4.x Petr Bavorovsky (Sun Dec 09 2001 - 16:57:21 EST)
• 2.4.17-pre2 (and 6) The failed "Read CD" packet command was Alex Riesen (Sun Dec 09 2001 - 16:54:35 EST)
• emu10k1 - interrupt storm? Zlatko Calusic (Sun Dec 09 2001 - 16:54:03 EST)
  • Re: emu10k1 - interrupt storm? Rui Sousa (Mon Dec 10 2001 - 05:39:46 EST)
    • Re: emu10k1 - interrupt storm? Zlatko Calusic (Mon Dec 10 2001 - 05:52:38 EST)
    • Re: emu10k1 - interrupt storm? Zlatko Calusic (Tue Dec 11 2001 - 15:03:41 EST)
      • Re: emu10k1 - interrupt storm? Rui Sousa (Wed Dec 12 2001 - 05:26:47 EST)
      • Re: emu10k1 - interrupt storm? Marcelo ''Mosca'' de Paula Bezerra (Wed Dec 12 2001 - 08:24:12 EST)
      • Re: emu10k1 - interrupt storm? Zlatko Calusic (Wed Dec 12 2001 - 16:47:30 EST)
      • Re: emu10k1 - interrupt storm? Morgan Collins (Wed Dec 12 2001 - 17:41:45 EST)
      • Re: emu10k1 - interrupt storm? Zlatko Calusic (Thu Dec 13 2001 - 02:50:18 EST)
      • Re: emu10k1 - interrupt storm? Philipp Matthias Hahn (Fri Dec 14 2001 - 02:38:34 EST)
      • Re: emu10k1 - interrupt storm? Zlatko Calusic (Wed Dec 12 2001 - 16:54:33 EST)
  • Re: emu10k1 - interrupt storm? Doug McNaught (Wed Dec 12 2001 - 17:23:37 EST)
    • Re: emu10k1 - interrupt storm? Zlatko Calusic (Thu Dec 13 2001 - 02:47:02 EST)
• Re: [PATCH] Make highly niced processes run only when idle Anthony DeRobertis (Sun Dec 09 2001 - 17:31:17 EST)
  • Re: [PATCH] Make highly niced processes run only when idle Robert Love (Sun Dec 09 2001 - 18:05:13 EST)
    • Re: [PATCH] Make highly niced processes run only when idle Benjamin LaHaise (Sun Dec 09 2001 - 18:16:43 EST)
      • Re: [PATCH] Make highly niced processes run only when idle Robert Love (Sun Dec 09 2001 - 18:21:05 EST)
      • Re: [PATCH] Make highly niced processes run only when idle Benjamin LaHaise (Sun Dec 09 2001 - 18:46:56 EST)
      • Re: [PATCH] Make highly niced processes run only when idle Robert Love (Sun Dec 09 2001 - 19:30:29 EST)
      • Re: [PATCH] Make highly niced processes run only when idle Rik van Riel (Sun Dec 09 2001 - 21:46:23 EST)
      • Re: [PATCH] Make highly niced processes run only when idle Niteshadow (Mon Dec 10 2001 - 07:25:42 EST)
      • Re: [PATCH] Make highly niced processes run only when idle Steve Bergman (Mon Dec 10 2001 - 20:35:16 EST)
    • Re: [PATCH] Make highly niced processes run only when idle Ton Hospel (Mon Dec 10 2001 - 20:36:51 EST)
      • Re: [PATCH] Make highly niced processes run only when idle Robert Love (Mon Dec 10 2001 - 20:54:42 EST)
• 2.4.16 / 2.4.17pre6 hang when loading agpgart Roel Teuwen (Sun Dec 09 2001 - 19:00:24 EST)
  • Re: 2.4.16 / 2.4.17pre6 hang when loading agpgart Reid Hekman (Sun Dec 09 2001 - 18:40:30 EST)
  • Re: 2.4.16 / 2.4.17pre6 hang when loading agpgart Diego SANTA CRUZ (Tue Dec 11 2001 - 09:22:19 EST)
• KERNEL SYSTEM CALLS DEFINITIONS Sarita N (Sun Dec 09 2001 - 17:51:43 EST)
  • Re: KERNEL SYSTEM CALLS DEFINITIONS Robert Love (Sun Dec 09 2001 - 18:06:58 EST)
    • Re: KERNEL SYSTEM CALLS DEFINITIONS mulix (Mon Dec 10 2001 - 02:52:42 EST)
  • Re: KERNEL SYSTEM CALLS DEFINITIONS Frank Cornelis (Mon Dec 10 2001 - 07:59:33 EST)
  • Re: KERNEL SYSTEM CALLS DEFINITIONS volodya@mindspring.com (Mon Dec 10 2001 - 08:31:57 EST)
• Re: Default outgoing IP address? Matthew G. Marsh (Sun Dec 09 2001 - 18:13:57 EST)
• [PATCH] console close race fix Robert Love (Sun Dec 09 2001 - 18:15:26 EST)
• SysRq to abort APM wait? Thomas Hood (Sun Dec 09 2001 - 18:18:44 EST)
• USB not processing APM suspend event properly? Thomas Hood (Sun Dec 09 2001 - 18:31:05 EST)
  • USB not processing APM suspend event properly? Thomas Hood (Wed Dec 12 2001 - 17:15:10 EST)
    • Re: USB not processing APM suspend event properly? Alan Cox (Wed Dec 12 2001 - 17:41:33 EST)
      • Re: USB not processing APM suspend event properly? Russell King (Wed Dec 12 2001 - 17:49:57 EST)
    • Re: USB not processing APM suspend event properly? Thomas Hood (Wed Dec 12 2001 - 18:40:26 EST)
      • Re: USB not processing APM suspend event properly? Russell King (Wed Dec 12 2001 - 18:49:16 EST)
    • Re: USB not processing APM suspend event properly? Thomas Hood (Wed Dec 12 2001 - 20:03:48 EST)
      • Re: USB not processing APM suspend event properly? Russell King (Thu Dec 13 2001 - 05:36:52 EST)
      • Re: USB not processing APM suspend event properly? Thomas Hood (Thu Dec 13 2001 - 09:10:18 EST)
• block devs and high latency Tom Vier (Sun Dec 09 2001 - 18:36:52 EST)
• whats up 688273788 hgrjo@aol.com (Sun Dec 09 2001 - 18:39:03 EST)
• [RFC] Scheduler queue implementation ... Davide Libenzi (Sun Dec 09 2001 - 19:33:18 EST)
  • Re: [RFC] Scheduler queue implementation ... Alan Cox (Sun Dec 09 2001 - 19:49:33 EST)
    • Re: [RFC] Scheduler queue implementation ... Davide Libenzi (Sun Dec 09 2001 - 19:57:29 EST)
      • Re: [RFC] Scheduler queue implementation ... Alan Cox (Sun Dec 09 2001 - 20:16:07 EST)
      • Re: [RFC] Scheduler queue implementation ... Davide Libenzi (Sun Dec 09 2001 - 21:36:28 EST)
  • Re: [RFC] Scheduler queue implementation ... Alan Cox (Sun Dec 09 2001 - 19:52:03 EST)
    • Re: [RFC] Scheduler queue implementation ... Davide Libenzi (Sun Dec 09 2001 - 20:06:04 EST)
      • Re: [RFC] Scheduler queue implementation ... Alan Cox (Sun Dec 09 2001 - 20:18:16 EST)
      • Re: [RFC] Scheduler queue implementation ... Davide Libenzi (Sun Dec 09 2001 - 20:38:42 EST)
      • Re: [RFC] Scheduler queue implementation ... Alan Cox (Sun Dec 09 2001 - 20:52:39 EST)
      • Re: [RFC] Scheduler queue implementation ... Davide Libenzi (Sun Dec 09 2001 - 22:06:35 EST)
      • Re: [RFC] Scheduler queue implementation ... Mike Kravetz (Mon Dec 10 2001 - 18:03:42 EST)
      • Re: [RFC] Scheduler queue implementation ... Davide Libenzi (Mon Dec 10 2001 - 18:30:29 EST)
• [PATCH] APIC Error when doing apic_pm_suspend Mikael Pettersson (Sun Dec 09 2001 - 20:07:15 EST)
  • Re: [PATCH] APIC Error when doing apic_pm_suspend Zwane Mwaikambo (Mon Dec 10 2001 - 05:12:52 EST)
  • Re: [PATCH] APIC Error when doing apic_pm_suspend Zwane Mwaikambo (Tue Dec 11 2001 - 01:08:54 EST)
• [OT] util-linux-2.11n Andries.Brouwer@cwi.nl (Sun Dec 09 2001 - 20:10:20 EST)
• highmem, aic7xxx, and vfat: too few segs for dma mapping LBJM (Sun Dec 09 2001 - 20:32:43 EST)
  • Re: highmem, aic7xxx, and vfat: too few segs for dma mapping Justin T. Gibbs (Mon Dec 10 2001 - 13:40:29 EST)
    • Re: highmem, aic7xxx, and vfat: too few segs for dma mapping Jens Axboe (Mon Dec 10 2001 - 14:21:30 EST)
      • Re: highmem, aic7xxx, and vfat: too few segs for dma mapping Justin T. Gibbs (Mon Dec 10 2001 - 14:50:59 EST)
      • Re: highmem, aic7xxx, and vfat: too few segs for dma mapping Jens Axboe (Mon Dec 10 2001 - 15:03:02 EST)
      • Re: highmem, aic7xxx, and vfat: too few segs for dma mapping Gérard Roudier (Mon Dec 10 2001 - 14:21:21 EST)
      • Re: highmem, aic7xxx, and vfat: too few segs for dma mapping David S. Miller (Tue Dec 11 2001 - 01:12:31 EST)
      • Re: highmem, aic7xxx, and vfat: too few segs for dma mapping Gérard Roudier (Tue Dec 11 2001 - 12:01:07 EST)
      • Re: highmem, aic7xxx, and vfat: too few segs for dma mapping Jens Axboe (Wed Dec 12 2001 - 04:36:54 EST)
      • Re: highmem, aic7xxx, and vfat: too few segs for dma mapping Andrea Arcangeli (Wed Dec 12 2001 - 08:32:13 EST)
      • Re: highmem, aic7xxx, and vfat: too few segs for dma mapping Gérard Roudier (Wed Dec 12 2001 - 12:22:30 EST)
      • Re: highmem, aic7xxx, and vfat: too few segs for dma mapping Andrea Arcangeli (Wed Dec 12 2001 - 17:19:36 EST)
      • Re: highmem, aic7xxx, and vfat: too few segs for dma mapping Gérard Roudier (Wed Dec 12 2001 - 15:24:59 EST)
      • Re: highmem, aic7xxx, and vfat: too few segs for dma mapping David S. Miller (Wed Dec 12 2001 - 19:26:03 EST)
      • Re: highmem, aic7xxx, and vfat: too few segs for dma mapping Gérard Roudier (Thu Dec 13 2001 - 11:17:22 EST)
      • Re: highmem, aic7xxx, and vfat: too few segs for dma mapping David S. Miller (Thu Dec 13 2001 - 15:30:08 EST)
      • Re: highmem, aic7xxx, and vfat: too few segs for dma mapping Gérard Roudier (Thu Dec 13 2001 - 13:13:01 EST)
      • Re: highmem, aic7xxx, and vfat: too few segs for dma mapping David S. Miller (Wed Dec 12 2001 - 19:06:31 EST)
      • Re: highmem, aic7xxx, and vfat: too few segs for dma mapping Gérard Roudier (Thu Dec 13 2001 - 11:39:19 EST)
      • Re: highmem, aic7xxx, and vfat: too few segs for dma mapping Gérard Roudier (Wed Dec 12 2001 - 11:39:20 EST)
      • Re: highmem, aic7xxx, and vfat: too few segs for dma mapping Steve Lord (Thu Dec 13 2001 - 15:10:20 EST)
      • Re: highmem, aic7xxx, and vfat: too few segs for dma mapping Justin T. Gibbs (Thu Dec 13 2001 - 15:15:44 EST)
      • Re: highmem, aic7xxx, and vfat: too few segs for dma mapping Steve Lord (Thu Dec 13 2001 - 15:29:29 EST)
      • Re: highmem, aic7xxx, and vfat: too few segs for dma mapping Justin T. Gibbs (Thu Dec 13 2001 - 15:48:50 EST)
      • Re: highmem, aic7xxx, and vfat: too few segs for dma mapping Steve Lord (Thu Dec 13 2001 - 15:58:31 EST)
      • Re: highmem, aic7xxx, and vfat: too few segs for dma mapping Steve Lord (Thu Dec 13 2001 - 16:17:24 EST)
      • Re: highmem, aic7xxx, and vfat: too few segs for dma mapping David S. Miller (Thu Dec 13 2001 - 16:27:34 EST)
      • Re: highmem, aic7xxx, and vfat: too few segs for dma mapping Jens Axboe (Fri Dec 14 2001 - 10:16:42 EST)
      • Re: highmem, aic7xxx, and vfat: too few segs for dma mapping Jens Axboe (Fri Dec 14 2001 - 11:15:06 EST)
      • RE: highmem, aic7xxx, and vfat: too few segs for dma mapping Alok K. Dhir (Fri Dec 14 2001 - 11:22:50 EST)
      • Re: highmem, aic7xxx, and vfat: too few segs for dma mapping Jens Axboe (Fri Dec 14 2001 - 11:32:59 EST)
      • Re: highmem, aic7xxx, and vfat: too few segs for dma mapping Stephen Lord (Fri Dec 14 2001 - 11:25:30 EST)
      • Re: highmem, aic7xxx, and vfat: too few segs for dma mapping Jens Axboe (Fri Dec 14 2001 - 11:24:03 EST)
• cdrom read errors with aic7xxx/ide-scsi but not ide Steffen Evers (Sun Dec 09 2001 - 20:41:52 EST)
• NFS stale mount after chroot... Daniel Freedman (Sun Dec 09 2001 - 20:57:08 EST)
  • Re: NFS stale mount after chroot... Daniel Freedman (Sun Dec 09 2001 - 21:18:34 EST)
  • Re: NFS stale mount after chroot... Tyler BIRD (Sun Dec 09 2001 - 22:42:00 EST)
  • Re: NFS stale mount after chroot... Anders Peter Fugmann (Mon Dec 10 2001 - 07:06:56 EST)
• 2.5.1-pre{7,8} fails to link Zilvinas Valinskas (Sun Dec 09 2001 - 22:03:20 EST)
  • Re: 2.5.1-pre{7,8} fails to link Chris Wright (Sun Dec 09 2001 - 23:16:12 EST)
• make modules-install: unresolved symbols for 2.4.17-pre6 Ben Greear (Sun Dec 09 2001 - 22:13:37 EST)
• Re: [PATCH] eepro100 - need testers Ben Greear (Sun Dec 09 2001 - 22:42:10 EST)
• Re: [PATCH] direct IO breaks root filesystem GOTO Masanori (Sun Dec 09 2001 - 22:59:32 EST)
  • Re: [PATCH] direct IO breaks root filesystem Linus Torvalds (Mon Dec 10 2001 - 00:55:57 EST)
    • Re: [PATCH] direct IO breaks root filesystem GOTO Masanori (Mon Dec 10 2001 - 07:39:51 EST)
      • Re: [PATCH] direct IO breaks root filesystem Andrea Arcangeli (Mon Dec 10 2001 - 09:40:57 EST)
      • Re: [PATCH] direct IO breaks root filesystem Linus Torvalds (Mon Dec 10 2001 - 12:10:24 EST)
      • Re: [PATCH] direct IO breaks root filesystem GOTO Masanori (Tue Dec 11 2001 - 04:03:08 EST)
      • Re: [PATCH] direct IO breaks root filesystem Alexander Viro (Tue Dec 11 2001 - 04:13:06 EST)
      • Re: [PATCH] direct IO breaks root filesystem GOTO Masanori (Tue Dec 11 2001 - 06:30:40 EST)
      • Re: [PATCH] direct IO breaks root filesystem Linus Torvalds (Tue Dec 11 2001 - 12:26:09 EST)
      • Re: [PATCH] direct IO breaks root filesystem Linus Torvalds (Tue Dec 11 2001 - 12:37:37 EST)
      • Re: [PATCH] direct IO breaks root filesystem Martin Dalecki (Tue Dec 11 2001 - 13:03:07 EST)
      • Re: [PATCH] direct IO breaks root filesystem Tachino Nobuhiro (Tue Dec 11 2001 - 19:25:33 EST)
      • Re: [PATCH] direct IO breaks root filesystem Linus Torvalds (Tue Dec 11 2001 - 19:34:15 EST)
      • Re: [PATCH] direct IO breaks root filesystem Tachino Nobuhiro (Tue Dec 11 2001 - 19:51:22 EST)
      • Re: [PATCH] direct IO breaks root filesystem Linus Torvalds (Tue Dec 11 2001 - 20:46:01 EST)
      • Re: [PATCH] direct IO breaks root filesystem Tachino Nobuhiro (Tue Dec 11 2001 - 21:46:29 EST)
      • Re: [PATCH] direct IO breaks root filesystem GOTO Masanori (Tue Dec 11 2001 - 22:25:12 EST)
      • Re: [PATCH] direct IO breaks root filesystem Marcelo Tosatti (Wed Dec 12 2001 - 11:20:55 EST)
• [ANNOUNCE] LTT-0.9.5pre4: User-space events and run-time trace mask modification Karim Yaghmour (Sun Dec 09 2001 - 23:11:54 EST)
• 2.5.1-pre8 -- Compile failure in ide-floppy.c Miles Lane (Sun Dec 09 2001 - 23:37:29 EST)
• slow read performance... Ian Molton (Sun Dec 09 2001 - 23:48:49 EST)
• 2.4.17-pre7: Oops with Tulip Burton W (Mon Dec 10 2001 - 01:08:28 EST)
  • Re: 2.4.17-pre7: Oops with Tulip Stephan von Krawczynski (Mon Dec 10 2001 - 08:27:07 EST)
  • Re: 2.4.17-pre7: Oops with Tulip Stephan von Krawczynski (Mon Dec 10 2001 - 21:40:45 EST)
• question on select: How big can the empty buffer space be before select returns ready-to-write? Ben Greear (Mon Dec 10 2001 - 01:16:57 EST)
  • Re: question on select: How big can the empty buffer space be before select returns ready-to-write? Chris Wright (Mon Dec 10 2001 - 02:33:49 EST)
    • Re: question on select: How big can the empty buffer space be before select returns ready-to-write? Alan Cox (Mon Dec 10 2001 - 03:38:18 EST)
      • Re: question on select: How big can the empty buffer space be before select returns ready-to-write? Ben Greear (Mon Dec 10 2001 - 11:41:49 EST)
    • Re: question on select: How big can the empty buffer space be before select returns ready-to-write? Christopher Friesen (Mon Dec 10 2001 - 14:05:31 EST)
      • Re: question on select: How big can the empty buffer space be before select returns ready-to-write? Chris Wright (Mon Dec 10 2001 - 16:46:26 EST)
• "Colo[u]rs" Stevie O (Mon Dec 10 2001 - 02:07:06 EST)
  • Re: "Colo[u]rs" Robert Love (Mon Dec 10 2001 - 02:26:47 EST)
    • Re: "Colo[u]rs" Robert Love (Mon Dec 10 2001 - 02:36:28 EST)
    • Re: "Colo[u]rs" Stevie O (Mon Dec 10 2001 - 03:00:26 EST)
      • Re: "Colo[u]rs" Robert Love (Mon Dec 10 2001 - 03:13:55 EST)
      • Re: "Colo[u]rs" ncw@axis.demon.co.uk (Mon Dec 10 2001 - 07:22:15 EST)
      • Re: "Colo[u]rs" Chris Wedgwood (Mon Dec 10 2001 - 12:52:39 EST)
  • Re: "Colo[u]rs" Larry McVoy (Mon Dec 10 2001 - 02:28:59 EST)
    • Re: "Colo[u]rs" David Lang (Mon Dec 10 2001 - 02:21:23 EST)
      • Re: "Colo[u]rs" Larry McVoy (Mon Dec 10 2001 - 02:51:26 EST)
      • Re: "Colo[u]rs" David Lang (Mon Dec 10 2001 - 02:30:05 EST)
  • Re: "Colo[u]rs" Stevie O (Mon Dec 10 2001 - 02:33:32 EST)
    • Re: "Colo[u]rs" Alan Cox (Mon Dec 10 2001 - 03:37:51 EST)
• Re: network interface names ethX and renaming interfaces Neale Banks (Mon Dec 10 2001 - 02:45:44 EST)
• Re: Question about sniffers and linux Abraham vd Merwe (Mon Dec 10 2001 - 03:09:18 EST)
  • Re: Question about sniffers and linux Lanfranco Salinari (Mon Dec 10 2001 - 08:38:36 EST)
• 2.4.16 & OOM killer screw up Abraham vd Merwe (Mon Dec 10 2001 - 03:14:52 EST)
  • Re: 2.4.16 & OOM killer screw up Marcelo Tosatti (Mon Dec 10 2001 - 13:46:02 EST)
  • Re: 2.4.16 & OOM killer screw up Andrea Arcangeli (Mon Dec 10 2001 - 19:02:23 EST)
• Re: [PATCH] proc-based cpu affinity user interface Albert D. Cahalan (Mon Dec 10 2001 - 03:33:05 EST)
  • Re: [PATCH] proc-based cpu affinity user interface Robert Love (Mon Dec 10 2001 - 03:40:32 EST)
    • Re: [PATCH] proc-based cpu affinity user interface Albert D. Cahalan (Mon Dec 10 2001 - 04:37:39 EST)
• Re: ramdisk size bug in 2.4.17-pre2 Tachino Nobuhiro (Mon Dec 10 2001 - 04:14:10 EST)
• Strange SAK event vda (Mon Dec 10 2001 - 08:50:42 EST)
  • Re: Strange SAK event Robert Love (Mon Dec 10 2001 - 05:04:47 EST)
• Patches in 2.4.17-pre2 that aren't in 2.5.1-pre8 Adrian Bunk (Mon Dec 10 2001 - 04:51:44 EST)
  • Re: Patches in 2.4.17-pre2 that aren't in 2.5.1-pre8 Alan Cox (Mon Dec 10 2001 - 05:10:05 EST)
  • Re: Patches in 2.4.17-pre2 that aren't in 2.5.1-pre8 Nicolas Aspert (Mon Dec 10 2001 - 06:43:53 EST)
    • Re: Patches in 2.4.17-pre2 that aren't in 2.5.1-pre8 Marcelo Tosatti (Mon Dec 10 2001 - 10:53:50 EST)
      • Re: Patches in 2.4.17-pre2 that aren't in 2.5.1-pre8 Alan Cox (Mon Dec 10 2001 - 12:30:20 EST)
      • Re: Patches in 2.4.17-pre2 that aren't in 2.5.1-pre8 Nicolas Aspert (Mon Dec 10 2001 - 12:22:31 EST)
      • Re: Patches in 2.4.17-pre2 that aren't in 2.5.1-pre8 Robert Love (Mon Dec 10 2001 - 13:18:51 EST)
      • Re: Patches in 2.4.17-pre2 that aren't in 2.5.1-pre8 Marcelo Tosatti (Mon Dec 10 2001 - 12:13:57 EST)
      • Re: Patches in 2.4.17-pre2 that aren't in 2.5.1-pre8 Stephan von Krawczynski (Mon Dec 10 2001 - 13:47:37 EST)
• Re: [kbuild-devel] Converting the 2.5 kernel to kbuild 2.5 Matthias Andree (Mon Dec 10 2001 - 04:55:31 EST)
• [PATCH] printk(*KERN_INFO* "Freeing unused kernel/initrd mem") vda (Mon Dec 10 2001 - 09:03:40 EST)
• Re: [Alsa-devel] Re: devfs unable to handle permission: 2.4.17-pre[4,5] / ALSA-0.9.0beta[9,10] Takashi Iwai (Mon Dec 10 2001 - 05:46:48 EST)
• ip_nat_irc bug? Ido Diamant (Mon Dec 10 2001 - 05:52:11 EST)
  • Re: ip_nat_irc bug? David S. Miller (Mon Dec 10 2001 - 14:14:34 EST)
    • Re: ip_nat_irc bug? Ido Diamant (Mon Dec 10 2001 - 06:26:42 EST)
• Oops at boot time (2.5.1-pre2 - pre8) root (Mon Dec 10 2001 - 04:54:17 EST)