Re: [Q] was the SYSENTER/SYSCALL fast system calls completed or discared in the end??

From: Terje Eggestad (terje.eggestad@scali.no)
Date: Thu Nov 22 2001 - 09:41:09 EST

Next message: Kai Germaschewski: "Re: PCMCIA and APM/ACPI issue (xircom card problem)"
Previous message: Phil Howard: "EINTR vs ERESTARTSYS, ERESTARTSYS not defined"
In reply to: Pavel Machek: "Re: [Q] was the SYSENTER/SYSCALL fast system calls completed or discared in the end??"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

ons, 2001-11-21 kl. 22:54 skrev Pavel Machek:
>
> On Mon 19-11-01 16:38:45, Terje Eggestad wrote:
> > subject says it all....
> >
> > I remember there was a discussion and a patch floating around that
> > implemented SYSCALL/SYSRET, just want to know what happened to it....
>
> discarded

Because there was no perf benefit or because the patch was in poor
quality?

>
> --
> <sig in construction>

-- _________________________________________________________________________

Terje Eggestad terje.eggestad@scali.no Scali Scalable Linux Systems http://www.scali.com

Olaf Helsets Vei 6 tel: +47 22 62 89 61 (OFFICE) P.O.Box 70 Bogerud +47 975 31 574 (MOBILE) N-0621 Oslo fax: +47 22 62 89 51 NORWAY _________________________________________________________________________

- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Kai Germaschewski: "Re: PCMCIA and APM/ACPI issue (xircom card problem)"
Previous message: Phil Howard: "EINTR vs ERESTARTSYS, ERESTARTSYS not defined"
In reply to: Pavel Machek: "Re: [Q] was the SYSENTER/SYSCALL fast system calls completed or discared in the end??"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Nov 23 2001 - 21:00:30 EST