Re: [Q] was the SYSENTER/SYSCALL fast system calls completed or discared in the end??

From: Pavel Machek (pavel@suse.cz)
Date: Wed Nov 21 2001 - 16:54:02 EST

Next message: Pavel Machek: "Re: [PATCH] AMD SMP capability sanity checking."
Previous message: Pavel Machek: "Disabling FPU, MMX, SSE units?"
In reply to: Terje Eggestad: "[Q] was the SYSENTER/SYSCALL fast system calls completed or discared in the end??"
Next in thread: Terje Eggestad: "Re: [Q] was the SYSENTER/SYSCALL fast system calls completed or discared in the end??"
Reply: Terje Eggestad: "Re: [Q] was the SYSENTER/SYSCALL fast system calls completed or discared in the end??"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Mon 19-11-01 16:38:45, Terje Eggestad wrote:
> subject says it all....
>
> I remember there was a discussion and a patch floating around that
> implemented SYSCALL/SYSRET, just want to know what happened to it....

discarded

-- 
<sig in construction>
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Pavel Machek: "Re: [PATCH] AMD SMP capability sanity checking."
Previous message: Pavel Machek: "Disabling FPU, MMX, SSE units?"
In reply to: Terje Eggestad: "[Q] was the SYSENTER/SYSCALL fast system calls completed or discared in the end??"
Next in thread: Terje Eggestad: "Re: [Q] was the SYSENTER/SYSCALL fast system calls completed or discared in the end??"
Reply: Terje Eggestad: "Re: [Q] was the SYSENTER/SYSCALL fast system calls completed or discared in the end??"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Nov 23 2001 - 21:00:29 EST