Re: please revert bogus patch to vmscan.c

From: David S. Miller (davem@redhat.com)
Date: Mon Oct 29 2001 - 19:01:23 EST


   From: Benjamin LaHaise <bcrl@redhat.com>
   Date: Mon, 29 Oct 2001 18:57:44 -0500
   
   See Paul's message. ia64 does the same thing with hardware walked hashed
   page tables. Now, do you want to pay for the 2 days of time you want me
   to commit to investigating something which is obvious to me? I don't think
   so.
   
Why would it take you two days to put together a test case for
something so "trivial"? Don't be rediculious.

I would be more than happy to pay for the 2 days it's going to take
for you to possibly admit "yeah, maybe it doesn't matter in real life,
sorry". :-)

Franks a lot,
David S. Miller
davem@redhat.com
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Oct 31 2001 - 21:00:38 EST