Re: concurrent VM subsystems

From: Rik van Riel (riel@conectiva.com.br)
Date: Thu Oct 25 2001 - 20:12:00 EST


On Fri, 26 Oct 2001, Luigi Genoni wrote:

> Obviously I was not meaning that desktops have not to be stable, but
> they are not subjects to long uptimes, at less usually, so page aging
> is, how can I say in correct english?, dealing with different
> conditions...

Interestingly, of all the people saying that we should have
different VM systems for different situations, NOBODY has
managed to point out what specific things should be different.

The current situation of having 2 competing VMs seems to work
out nicely, though. Especially when ideas get merged all the
time.

regards,

Rik

-- 
DMCA, SSSCA, W3C?  Who cares?  http://thefreeworld.net/

http://www.surriel.com/ http://distro.conectiva.com/

- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Oct 31 2001 - 21:00:29 EST