Re: concurrent VM subsystems

From: Luigi Genoni (kernel@Expansa.sns.it)
Date: Thu Oct 25 2001 - 17:35:03 EST


Obviously I was not meaning that desktops have not to be stable, but they
are not subjects to long uptimes, at less usually, so page aging is,
how can I say in correct english?, dealing with different conditions...

Luigi

On Fri, 26 Oct 2001, CaT wrote:

> On Thu, Oct 25, 2001 at 03:06:51PM +0200, Luigi Genoni wrote:
> > I already exposed my opinion, and both Andrea and Rik know it very well.
> > The VM for servers needs to be predictable, for desktops needs to be as
> > fast as possible, also if it is a little less predictable and stable (who
> > cares if you reboot you desktop once every two days?).
>
> It doesn't matter if it's every 2 days or 2 years if it does it just
> when you're doing something that must NOT be interrupted and you lose
> a buttload of work. Stability is important in both a server AND desktop
> environment.
>
> --
> CaT "As you can expect it's really affecting my sex life. I can't help
> it. Each time my wife initiates sex, these ejaculating hippos keep
> floating through my mind."
> - Mohd. Binatang bin Goncang, Singapore Zoological Gardens
>

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Oct 31 2001 - 21:00:29 EST