Which is better at vm, and why? 2.2 or 2.4

From: Patrick McFarland (unknown@panax.com)
Date: Sat Oct 13 2001 - 12:02:28 EST

Next message: Alan Cox: "Re: Which is better at vm, and why? 2.2 or 2.4"
Previous message: Michael Kerrisk: "Purpose of file system user / group ID (FSUID/FSGID)"
Next in thread: Alan Cox: "Re: Which is better at vm, and why? 2.2 or 2.4"
Reply: Alan Cox: "Re: Which is better at vm, and why? 2.2 or 2.4"
Maybe reply: Patrick McFarland: "Re: Which is better at vm, and why? 2.2 or 2.4"
Reply: Mark Hahn: "Re: Which is better at vm, and why? 2.2 or 2.4"
Maybe reply: Patrick McFarland: "Re: Which is better at vm, and why? 2.2 or 2.4"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Now, the great kernel hacker, ac, said that 2.2 is better at vm in low memory situations than 2.4 is. Why is this? Why hasnt someone fixed the 2.4 code?

-- 
Patrick "Diablo-D3" McFarland || unknown@panax.com

application/pgp-signature attachment: stored

- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Alan Cox: "Re: Which is better at vm, and why? 2.2 or 2.4"
Previous message: Michael Kerrisk: "Purpose of file system user / group ID (FSUID/FSGID)"
Next in thread: Alan Cox: "Re: Which is better at vm, and why? 2.2 or 2.4"
Reply: Alan Cox: "Re: Which is better at vm, and why? 2.2 or 2.4"
Maybe reply: Patrick McFarland: "Re: Which is better at vm, and why? 2.2 or 2.4"
Reply: Mark Hahn: "Re: Which is better at vm, and why? 2.2 or 2.4"
Maybe reply: Patrick McFarland: "Re: Which is better at vm, and why? 2.2 or 2.4"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Oct 15 2001 - 21:00:49 EST