Re: Which is better at vm, and why? 2.2 or 2.4

From: Patrick McFarland (
Date: Sat Oct 13 2001 - 12:49:27 EST

Well, I dont actually need anything thats provided in 2.4 thats not provided in 2.2. I tend to use standard hardware. Would 2.2 be a better choice?

On 13-Oct-2001, Alan Cox wrote:
> > Hmm, it seems that I didnt realize I had to cc that to the list, because I =
> > belive this is something that should be on the list.
> >
> > Anyhow, exactly how much tweeking did you do, and isnt the ac tree suppost =
> > to be unstable?
> The -ac patches vary in stability. The release announcement for each one is
> intended to be a guide to how stable I expect it to be.

Patrick "Diablo-D3" McFarland ||

- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to More majordomo info at Please read the FAQ at

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Oct 15 2001 - 21:00:50 EST