> Chris Mason <mason@suse.com> writes:
>
> > Correct, in the current 2.4.x code, its a quirk. fsync(any object) ==
> > fsync(all pending metadata, including renames).
>
> This does not help. The MTAs are doing fsync() on the temporary file
> and then using the *subsequent* rename() as the committing operation.
Which is quaint, because as we've pointed out repeatedly to you rename
is not an atomic operation. Even on a simple BSD or ext2 style fs it can
be two directory block writes, metadata block writes, a bitmap write
and a cylinder group write.
> It would be nice to have an option (on either the directory or the
> mountpoint) to cause all metadata updates to commit to the journal
> without causing all operations to be fully synchronous. This would
You mean fsync() on the directory.
Alan
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Jul 31 2001 - 21:00:44 EST