Re: [NFS] [PATCH] Bug in NFS - should init be allowed to set umask???

From: Linus Torvalds (torvalds@transmeta.com)
Date: Fri Jul 13 2001 - 21:03:20 EST

Next message: Andrew Morton: "Re: [PATCH] 64 bit scsi read/write"
Previous message: Jonathan Lundell: "Re: [PATCH] 64 bit scsi read/write"
In reply to: Neil Brown: "Re: [NFS] [PATCH] Bug in NFS - should init be allowed to set umask???"
Next in thread: Neil Brown: "Re: [NFS] [PATCH] Bug in NFS - should init be allowed to set umask???"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Sat, 14 Jul 2001, Neil Brown wrote:
>
> I've found a 4th option. We make it so that fs->umask does not affect
> nfsd

Me likee.

Applied. I'd only like to double-check that you made sure you changed all
callers?

Linus

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Andrew Morton: "Re: [PATCH] 64 bit scsi read/write"
Previous message: Jonathan Lundell: "Re: [PATCH] 64 bit scsi read/write"
In reply to: Neil Brown: "Re: [NFS] [PATCH] Bug in NFS - should init be allowed to set umask???"
Next in thread: Neil Brown: "Re: [NFS] [PATCH] Bug in NFS - should init be allowed to set umask???"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Jul 15 2001 - 21:00:20 EST