At 4:04 PM -0600 2001-07-13, Andreas Dilger wrote:
>**) As I said in my previous posting, it depends on if/how MD RAID does
> write ordering of I/O to the data sector and the parity sector. If
> it holds back the parity write until the data I/O(s) are complete, and
> trusts the data over parity on recovery, you should be OK unless you
> have multiple failures (i.e. bad disk + crash). If it doesn't do this
> ordering, or trusts parity over data, then you are F***ed (I doubt it
> would have this problem).
That wouldn't help, would it, if >1 data sectors were being written.
The fault mode of a sector simply not being written seems like a real
weak point of both RAID-1 and RAID-5. Not that RAID-5 parity ever
gets checked, I think, under normal circumstances, nor RAID-1 mirrors
get compared, but if they were check and there was an parity or
mirror-compare error and no other indication of a fault (eg CRC),
there's no way to recover correct data.
-- /Jonathan Lundell. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Jul 15 2001 - 21:00:20 EST