> For example, one board I've got doesn't allow you to do a straight
> memory-mapped I/O access to your PCI device directly, but have to reposition a
> window in the CPU's memory space over part of the PCI memory space first, and
> then hold a spinlock whilst you do it.
What does this prove. PA-RISC has this problem in reverse for I/O cycle access
to PCI slots on hppa1.1 at least. Cookies work _fine_
And by the time you are taking a spinlock who cares about the add, you can do
that while the bus transactions for the atomic op are completing
On the other hand each call, each push of resource * pointers costs real clocks
on x86
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Jul 07 2001 - 21:00:12 EST