Re: [Re: gcc: internal compiler error: program cc1 got fatal signal 11]

From: H. Peter Anvin (hpa@zytor.com)
Date: Sun Jul 01 2001 - 19:21:32 EST


Riley Williams wrote:

> Hi Peter.
>
> >> Wasn't 2.2.12 the kernel that included the `lock halt` bug patch?
>
> > Perhaps, but is has absolutely nothing to do with the rest of
> > this discussion.
>
> The `lock halt` bug patch was specific to the Cyrix processors (not to
> be confused with the `lock registers` patch for the Intel processors,
> and I noted that the processor in question was a Cyrix one, hence the
> comment.
>

Oh. Sorry, I don't know about "lock halt" and its effects. However, if
it refers to the instruction sequence LOCK HLT I find it hard to believe
it would have the symptoms described.

        -hpa

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Jul 07 2001 - 21:00:09 EST