Re: CML2 design philosophy heads-up

From: Alan Cox (alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk)
Date: Sat May 19 2001 - 19:08:42 EST

Next message: Alan Cox: "Re: [RFD w/info-PATCH] device arguments from lookup, partion code"
Previous message: Edgar Toernig: "Re: Why side-effects on open(2) are evil. (was Re: [RFD w/info-PATCH]device arguments from lookup)"
In reply to: Ben Ford: "Re: CML2 design philosophy heads-up"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

> No, my point was, if I don't have SCSI or RAID on this box, I don't want
> them to be built into the kernel!

They arent built into the kernel. I still think you have your facts confused

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Alan Cox: "Re: [RFD w/info-PATCH] device arguments from lookup, partion code"
Previous message: Edgar Toernig: "Re: Why side-effects on open(2) are evil. (was Re: [RFD w/info-PATCH]device arguments from lookup)"
In reply to: Ben Ford: "Re: CML2 design philosophy heads-up"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed May 23 2001 - 21:00:35 EST