Re: Why side-effects on open(2) are evil. (was Re: [RFD w/info-PATCH]device arguments from lookup)

From: Edgar Toernig (froese@gmx.de)
Date: Sat May 19 2001 - 18:52:43 EST


nitpicking: a system call without side effects would be pretty useless.

Alexander Viro wrote:
> A lot of stuff relies on the fact that close(open(foo, O_RDONLY)) is a
> no-op. Breaking that assumption is a Bad Thing(tm).

That assumption is totally bogus. Even for regular files you have side
effects (atime); for anything else they're unpredictable.

Ciao, ET.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed May 23 2001 - 21:00:35 EST