Hi Padraig,
On Thu, 26 Apr 2001, Padraig Brady wrote:
> 2. Is tmpfs is basically swap and /tmp together in a ramdisk?
> The advantage being you need to reserve less RAM for both
> together than seperately?
tmpfs is ramfs+swap+limits. It is not using ramdisks and is not
related to them.
> 3. If I've no backing store (harddisk?) is there any advantage
> of using tmpfs instead of ramfs? Also does tmpfs need a
> backing store?
Probably yes, since you spare a little bit kernel memory. most of
tmpfs is unconditionally in the kernel for shared mappings. So the
actual CONFIG_TMPFS only adds some small functions to the kernel to
export this to usre space.
Greetings
Christoph
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Apr 30 2001 - 21:00:17 EST