Re: FA-311 / Natsemi problems with 2.4.1

From: Jeff Garzik (jgarzik@mandrakesoft.com)
Date: Tue Feb 06 2001 - 18:28:49 EST

Next message: Juraj Bednar: "Re: smp_num_cpus redefined? (compiling 2.2.18 for non-SMP?)"
Previous message: Alexander Zvyagin: "Problems with Linux 2.4.1"
In reply to: Jocelyn Mayer: "Re: FA-311 / Natsemi problems with 2.4.1"
Next in thread: Ben Pharr: "Re: FA-311 / Natsemi problems with 2.4.1"
Reply: Ben Pharr: "Re: FA-311 / Natsemi problems with 2.4.1"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Jocelyn Mayer wrote:
>
> I found something from OpenBSD:
> the natsemi chip (in fact DP83815)
> is quite the same as SiS900 one.

If that is true, maybe you can hack drivers/net/sis900.c to get it to
work with the FA-311?

Jeff

-- 
Jeff Garzik       | "You see, in this world there's two kinds of
Building 1024     |  people, my friend: Those with loaded guns
MandrakeSoft      |  and those who dig. You dig."  --Blondie
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Juraj Bednar: "Re: smp_num_cpus redefined? (compiling 2.2.18 for non-SMP?)"
Previous message: Alexander Zvyagin: "Problems with Linux 2.4.1"
In reply to: Jocelyn Mayer: "Re: FA-311 / Natsemi problems with 2.4.1"
Next in thread: Ben Pharr: "Re: FA-311 / Natsemi problems with 2.4.1"
Reply: Ben Pharr: "Re: FA-311 / Natsemi problems with 2.4.1"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Feb 07 2001 - 21:00:25 EST