Re: 2.4.0 + iproute2

From: David S. Miller (davem@redhat.com)
Date: Sun Jan 14 2001 - 05:55:28 EST


Andi Kleen writes:
> In my opinion (rt)netlink would benefit a lot from introducing 5-10
> new errnos and possibly a new socket option to get a string/number
> with the exact error.

Introducing 5-10 new errnos just for rtnetlink is a big waste when we
already have socket extended errors which are perfect for this
purpose.

Later,
David S. Miller
davem@redhat.com
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Jan 15 2001 - 21:00:38 EST