Linux-Kernel Archive
By Thread

Starting: Mon Jan 08 2001 - 00:10:12 EST
Ending: Mon Jan 15 2001 - 20:55:56 EST

• Re: [OT] Re: [OT] Re: .br blacklisted ? Matt Beland (Mon Jan 08 2001 - 00:07:30 EST)
  • Re: [OT] Re: [OT] Re: .br blacklisted ? Dan Hollis (Mon Jan 08 2001 - 01:02:38 EST)
  • Re: [OT] Re: [OT] Re: .br blacklisted ? Dan Hollis (Mon Jan 08 2001 - 01:12:59 EST)
  • Re: [OT] Re: [OT] Re: .br blacklisted ? Dan Hollis (Mon Jan 08 2001 - 01:21:35 EST)
• Re: [PATCH] More Configure.help fixes Jeremy M. Dolan (Mon Jan 08 2001 - 00:12:28 EST)
  • Re: [PATCH] More Configure.help fixes Paul Gortmaker (Mon Jan 08 2001 - 09:49:47 EST)
• [PATCH] mm/mmap.c find_vma(), kernel 2.4.0 Robert Wienholt, Jr. (Mon Jan 08 2001 - 00:03:29 EST)
  • Re: [PATCH] mm/mmap.c find_vma(), kernel 2.4.0 Alexander Viro (Mon Jan 08 2001 - 00:25:17 EST)
    • Re: [PATCH] mm/mmap.c find_vma(), kernel 2.4.0 Robert Wienholt, Jr. (Mon Jan 08 2001 - 00:29:24 EST)
• Normal Response Mode of HDLC for linux aprasad@in.ibm.com (Mon Jan 08 2001 - 00:16:38 EST)
• Re: Change of policy for future 2.2 driver submissions Wayne.Brown@altec.com (Sun Jan 07 2001 - 23:52:48 EST)
  • Re: Change of policy for future 2.2 driver submissions David Weinehall (Mon Jan 08 2001 - 06:07:08 EST)
  • Re: Change of policy for future 2.2 driver submissions Wayne.Brown@altec.com (Mon Jan 08 2001 - 10:36:33 EST)
  • Re: Change of policy for future 2.2 driver submissions Hubert Mantel (Tue Jan 09 2001 - 09:49:08 EST)
    • Re: Change of policy for future 2.2 driver submissions Alan Cox (Tue Jan 09 2001 - 09:54:44 EST)
      • Re: Change of policy for future 2.2 driver submissions Jakob Østergaard (Tue Jan 09 2001 - 18:49:17 EST)
      • Re: Change of policy for future 2.2 driver submissions Linus Torvalds (Tue Jan 09 2001 - 19:02:08 EST)
    • Re: Change of policy for future 2.2 driver submissions Ingo Molnar (Tue Jan 09 2001 - 19:33:10 EST)
      • Re: Change of policy for future 2.2 driver submissions Andrea Arcangeli (Tue Jan 09 2001 - 20:03:20 EST)
      • Re: Change of policy for future 2.2 driver submissions Ingo Molnar (Tue Jan 09 2001 - 20:17:35 EST)
      • Re: Change of policy for future 2.2 driver submissions Andrea Arcangeli (Tue Jan 09 2001 - 20:40:29 EST)
• Re: posix_types.h error Mike Galbraith (Mon Jan 08 2001 - 00:25:53 EST)
  • Re: posix_types.h error Niels Kristian Bech Jensen (Mon Jan 08 2001 - 01:10:12 EST)
• Re: Subtle MM bug Wayne Whitney (Mon Jan 08 2001 - 00:29:29 EST)
  • Re: Subtle MM bug Andi Kleen (Mon Jan 08 2001 - 00:42:25 EST)
    • Re: Subtle MM bug Linus Torvalds (Mon Jan 08 2001 - 01:04:04 EST)
      • Re: Subtle MM bug Rik van Riel (Mon Jan 08 2001 - 12:44:11 EST)
      • Re: Subtle MM bug Linus Torvalds (Mon Jan 08 2001 - 13:02:12 EST)
  • Re: Subtle MM bug Rik van Riel (Mon Jan 08 2001 - 12:16:48 EST)
    • Re: Subtle MM bug Linus Torvalds (Mon Jan 08 2001 - 12:58:15 EST)
    • Re: Subtle MM bug Wayne Whitney (Mon Jan 08 2001 - 16:30:56 EST)
  • Re: Subtle MM bug Szabolcs Szakacsits (Mon Jan 08 2001 - 15:39:43 EST)
    • Re: Subtle MM bug Wayne Whitney (Mon Jan 08 2001 - 16:56:08 EST)
      • Re: Subtle MM bug Wayne Whitney (Mon Jan 08 2001 - 18:22:44 EST)
      • Re: Subtle MM bug Andrea Arcangeli (Mon Jan 08 2001 - 18:30:02 EST)
      • Re: Subtle MM bug Linus Torvalds (Mon Jan 08 2001 - 19:37:45 EST)
      • Re: Subtle MM bug (really 830MB barrier question) Wayne Whitney (Mon Jan 08 2001 - 22:01:15 EST)
      • Re: Subtle MM bug (really 830MB barrier question) Dan Maas (Tue Jan 09 2001 - 06:47:58 EST)
      • Re: Subtle MM bug (really 830MB barrier question) Szabolcs Szakacsits (Tue Jan 09 2001 - 15:06:51 EST)
      • Re: Subtle MM bug (really 830MB barrier question) Wayne Whitney (Tue Jan 09 2001 - 18:45:31 EST)
      • Re: Subtle MM bug (really 830MB barrier question) Wayne Whitney (Wed Jan 10 2001 - 19:03:39 EST)
      • [2.4.0 pre-PATCH] 830MB barrier (was: Subtle MM bug) Wayne Whitney (Wed Jan 10 2001 - 21:46:33 EST)
    • Re: Subtle MM bug Wayne Whitney (Mon Jan 08 2001 - 17:00:19 EST)
      • Re: Subtle MM bug Andrea Arcangeli (Mon Jan 08 2001 - 17:15:58 EST)
  • Re: Subtle MM bug Zlatko Calusic (Mon Jan 08 2001 - 21:01:52 EST)
  • Re: Subtle MM bug Zlatko Calusic (Mon Jan 08 2001 - 18:41:14 EST)
    • Re: Subtle MM bug Linus Torvalds (Mon Jan 08 2001 - 21:58:00 EST)
  • Re: Subtle MM bug Eric W. Biederman (Tue Jan 09 2001 - 01:20:58 EST)
    • Re: Subtle MM bug Linus Torvalds (Tue Jan 09 2001 - 02:27:15 EST)
  • Re: Subtle MM bug Zlatko Calusic (Tue Jan 09 2001 - 07:29:00 EST)
    • Re: Subtle MM bug Linus Torvalds (Tue Jan 09 2001 - 13:47:57 EST)
      • Re: Subtle MM bug Daniel Phillips (Tue Jan 09 2001 - 14:09:43 EST)
      • Re: Subtle MM bug Linus Torvalds (Tue Jan 09 2001 - 14:37:05 EST)
      • Re: Subtle MM bug Simon Kirby (Tue Jan 09 2001 - 14:53:52 EST)
      • Re: Subtle MM bug Linus Torvalds (Tue Jan 09 2001 - 15:08:41 EST)
      • Re: Subtle MM bug David Woodhouse (Tue Jan 09 2001 - 20:45:47 EST)
      • Re: Subtle MM bug Andrea Arcangeli (Tue Jan 09 2001 - 21:26:07 EST)
      • Re: Subtle MM bug Linus Torvalds (Wed Jan 10 2001 - 01:57:11 EST)
      • Re: Subtle MM bug David Woodhouse (Wed Jan 10 2001 - 06:46:03 EST)
      • Re: Subtle MM bug Andrea Arcangeli (Wed Jan 10 2001 - 09:56:24 EST)
      • Re: Subtle MM bug Linus Torvalds (Wed Jan 10 2001 - 12:03:03 EST)
      • Re: Subtle MM bug Jim Gettys (Thu Jan 11 2001 - 09:36:01 EST)
  • Re: Subtle MM bug Eric W. Biederman (Tue Jan 09 2001 - 06:38:56 EST)
  • Re: Subtle MM bug Trond Myklebust (Tue Jan 09 2001 - 14:29:02 EST)
    • Re: Subtle MM bug Andi Kleen (Wed Jan 10 2001 - 12:32:56 EST)
      • Re: Subtle MM bug Alan Cox (Wed Jan 10 2001 - 14:31:52 EST)
      • Re: Subtle MM bug Andi Kleen (Wed Jan 10 2001 - 14:33:07 EST)
      • Re: Subtle MM bug Alan Cox (Wed Jan 10 2001 - 14:40:49 EST)
      • Re: Subtle MM bug Andi Kleen (Wed Jan 10 2001 - 14:43:08 EST)
      • Re: Subtle MM bug Alan Cox (Wed Jan 10 2001 - 14:48:04 EST)
      • Re: Subtle MM bug Andi Kleen (Wed Jan 10 2001 - 14:48:56 EST)
      • Re: Subtle MM bug Trond Myklebust (Thu Jan 11 2001 - 04:51:37 EST)
      • Re: Subtle MM bug Linus Torvalds (Wed Jan 10 2001 - 15:11:16 EST)
      • Re: Subtle MM bug Stephen C. Tweedie (Thu Jan 11 2001 - 07:56:04 EST)
      • Re: Subtle MM bug Andi Kleen (Thu Jan 11 2001 - 08:10:38 EST)
      • Re: Subtle MM bug Trond Myklebust (Thu Jan 11 2001 - 08:12:05 EST)
      • Re: Subtle MM bug Stephen C. Tweedie (Thu Jan 11 2001 - 09:13:30 EST)
      • Re: Subtle MM bug Alexander Viro (Thu Jan 11 2001 - 14:03:48 EST)
      • Re: Subtle MM bug Stephen C. Tweedie (Thu Jan 11 2001 - 14:47:53 EST)
      • Re: Subtle MM bug Alexander Viro (Thu Jan 11 2001 - 14:57:30 EST)
      • Re: Subtle MM bug Albert D. Cahalan (Thu Jan 11 2001 - 11:50:21 EST)
      • Re: Subtle MM bug Stephen C. Tweedie (Thu Jan 11 2001 - 12:35:12 EST)
      • Re: Subtle MM bug Albert D. Cahalan (Thu Jan 11 2001 - 14:38:24 EST)
      • Re: Subtle MM bug Alexander Viro (Thu Jan 11 2001 - 14:01:14 EST)
  • Re: Subtle MM bug Zlatko Calusic (Tue Jan 09 2001 - 15:10:54 EST)
  • Re: Subtle MM bug Eric W. Biederman (Wed Jan 10 2001 - 12:46:07 EST)
    • Re: Subtle MM bug Andrea Arcangeli (Wed Jan 10 2001 - 13:33:40 EST)
    • Re: Subtle MM bug Linus Torvalds (Wed Jan 10 2001 - 14:03:21 EST)
      • Re: Subtle MM bug David S. Miller (Wed Jan 10 2001 - 14:27:03 EST)
      • Re: Subtle MM bug Alan Cox (Wed Jan 10 2001 - 14:36:43 EST)
      • Re: Subtle MM bug David Weinehall (Wed Jan 10 2001 - 18:56:57 EST)
      • Re: Subtle MM bug Alan Cox (Wed Jan 10 2001 - 19:24:20 EST)
      • Re: Subtle MM bug Ralf Baechle (Fri Jan 12 2001 - 00:56:20 EST)
  • Re: Subtle MM bug Chris Wing (Wed Jan 10 2001 - 14:57:27 EST)
  • Re: Subtle MM bug Eric W. Biederman (Fri Jan 12 2001 - 11:10:54 EST)
    • Re: Subtle MM bug Russell King (Fri Jan 12 2001 - 16:11:43 EST)
      • Re: Subtle MM bug Ralf Baechle (Sun Jan 14 2001 - 21:56:10 EST)
    • Re: Subtle MM bug Ralf Baechle (Sun Jan 14 2001 - 21:53:15 EST)
  • Re: Subtle MM bug Eric W. Biederman (Mon Jan 15 2001 - 01:59:23 EST)
• Re: [PATCH] hashed device lookup (Does NOT meet Linus' sumission policy!) Andi Kleen (Mon Jan 08 2001 - 00:32:14 EST)
  • Re: [PATCH] hashed device lookup (Does NOT meet Linus' sumission policy!) Chris Wedgwood (Mon Jan 08 2001 - 01:12:09 EST)
    • Re: [PATCH] hashed device lookup (Does NOT meet Linus' sumission policy!) Andi Kleen (Mon Jan 08 2001 - 01:26:34 EST)
      • Re: [PATCH] hashed device lookup (Does NOT meet Linus' sumission policy!) David Ford (Mon Jan 08 2001 - 01:57:45 EST)
      • Re: [PATCH] hashed device lookup (Does NOT meet Linus' sumission policy!) jamal (Mon Jan 08 2001 - 08:08:12 EST)
      • Re: [PATCH] hashed device lookup (Does NOT meet Linus' sumission policy!) Blu3Viper (Tue Jan 09 2001 - 08:28:08 EST)
  • Re: [PATCH] hashed device lookup (Does NOT meet Linus' sumission policy!) Blu3Viper (Mon Jan 08 2001 - 01:13:06 EST)
• 2.4.0-ac3 write() to tcp socket returning errno of -3 (ESRCH: "No such process") Paul Cassella (Mon Jan 08 2001 - 00:55:28 EST)
  • Re: 2.4.0-ac3 write() to tcp socket returning errno of -3 (ESRCH: "No such process") David S. Miller (Mon Jan 08 2001 - 00:58:48 EST)
    • Re: 2.4.0-ac3 write() to tcp socket returning errno of -3 (ESRCH: "No such process") Paul Cassella (Mon Jan 08 2001 - 02:16:27 EST)
      • Re: 2.4.0-ac3 write() to tcp socket returning errno of -3 (ESRCH: "No such process") David S. Miller (Mon Jan 08 2001 - 02:05:45 EST)
  • Re: 2.4.0-ac3 write() to tcp socket returning errno of -3 (ESRCH: "No such process") Andi Kleen (Mon Jan 08 2001 - 01:35:12 EST)
    • Re: 2.4.0-ac3 write() to tcp socket returning errno of -3 (ESRCH: "No such process") Paul Cassella (Mon Jan 08 2001 - 02:54:25 EST)
  • Re: 2.4.0-ac3 write() to tcp socket returning errno of -3 (ESRCH: "No such process") Paul Cassella (Tue Jan 09 2001 - 09:03:18 EST)
    • Re: 2.4.0-ac3 write() to tcp socket returning errno of -3 (ESRCH: "No such process") Paul Cassella (Thu Jan 11 2001 - 11:45:13 EST)
      • Re: 2.4.0-ac3 write() to tcp socket returning errno of -3 (ESRCH: "No such process") David S. Miller (Thu Jan 11 2001 - 12:18:44 EST)
      • Re: 2.4.0-ac3 write() to tcp socket returning errno of -3 (ESRCH:"No such process") Andrew Morton (Fri Jan 12 2001 - 05:52:28 EST)
• Broken tty handling David Ford (Mon Jan 08 2001 - 01:04:43 EST)
  • Re: Broken tty handling Andrew Morton (Mon Jan 08 2001 - 05:08:24 EST)
    • Re: Broken tty handling Blu3Viper (Tue Jan 09 2001 - 08:35:32 EST)
• [PATCH] 2.4.0-ac4 : fs/qnx4/inode.c Frank Davis (Mon Jan 08 2001 - 01:03:46 EST)
  • Re: [PATCH] 2.4.0-ac4 : fs/qnx4/inode.c Alan Cox (Mon Jan 08 2001 - 06:30:46 EST)
• [OT] Re: performance boost from merging linux-2.4.0, xfree86-4.02 Mike Galbraith (Mon Jan 08 2001 - 00:53:11 EST)
• Re: DHCP Problems with 3com 3c905C Tornado Tim Wright (Mon Jan 08 2001 - 02:02:26 EST)
  • Re: DHCP Problems with 3com 3c905C Tornado Andrew Morton (Mon Jan 08 2001 - 04:12:20 EST)
    • Re: DHCP Problems with 3com 3c905C Tornado David Ford (Mon Jan 08 2001 - 04:13:41 EST)
    • Re: DHCP Problems with 3com 3c905C Tornado Alan Cox (Mon Jan 08 2001 - 06:56:19 EST)
      • Re: DHCP Problems with 3com 3c905C Tornado Andrew Morton (Mon Jan 08 2001 - 07:53:19 EST)
      • Re: DHCP Problems with 3com 3c905C Tornado Christian Loth (Mon Jan 08 2001 - 08:10:31 EST)
• 2.4.0test12: problems timing events Ulrich Windl (Mon Jan 08 2001 - 02:07:50 EST)
• Re: [PATCH] hashed device lookup (New Benchmarks) Ben Greear (Mon Jan 08 2001 - 03:12:21 EST)
  • Re: [PATCH] hashed device lookup (New Benchmarks) David S. Miller (Mon Jan 08 2001 - 02:00:45 EST)
    • Re: [PATCH] hashed device lookup (New Benchmarks) Ben Greear (Mon Jan 08 2001 - 11:26:07 EST)
      • Re: [PATCH] hashed device lookup (New Benchmarks) Andi Kleen (Mon Jan 08 2001 - 11:50:36 EST)
      • Re: [PATCH] hashed device lookup (New Benchmarks) Ben Greear (Tue Jan 09 2001 - 11:27:31 EST)
• Re: Patch (repost): cramfs memory corruption fix Eric W. Biederman (Mon Jan 08 2001 - 01:56:06 EST)
  • Re: Patch (repost): cramfs memory corruption fix David Woodhouse (Mon Jan 08 2001 - 08:11:56 EST)
    • Re: Patch (repost): cramfs memory corruption fix Shane Nay (Mon Jan 08 2001 - 07:30:58 EST)
      • Re: Patch (repost): cramfs memory corruption fix David Woodhouse (Mon Jan 08 2001 - 09:34:49 EST)
  • Re: Patch (repost): cramfs memory corruption fix Christoph Rohland (Mon Jan 08 2001 - 08:37:13 EST)
    • Re: Patch (repost): cramfs memory corruption fix Christoph Hellwig (Mon Jan 08 2001 - 09:19:25 EST)
    • Re: Patch (repost): cramfs memory corruption fix Alan Cox (Mon Jan 08 2001 - 09:42:18 EST)
  • Re: Patch (repost): cramfs memory corruption fix Christoph Rohland (Mon Jan 08 2001 - 09:43:19 EST)
  • Re: Patch (repost): cramfs memory corruption fix Christoph Rohland (Mon Jan 08 2001 - 09:49:49 EST)
  • Re: Patch (repost): cramfs memory corruption fix Linus Torvalds (Mon Jan 08 2001 - 13:27:11 EST)
• Re: PROBLEM: SCSI hangs with aic7xxx in 2.4.0 SMP Rainer Tammer (Mon Jan 08 2001 - 02:12:39 EST)
• 3CCFE575CT problem in 2.4.0, Maybe a PCI subsystem bug Tommy Wu (Mon Jan 08 2001 - 02:11:41 EST)
• [PATCH] wrong stat of NTFS volume in linux-kernel 2.4.0 Willem Dekker (Mon Jan 08 2001 - 02:35:07 EST)
• Are PCI add-on Cardbus Readers supported by the 2.4.0 kernel? Miles Lane (Mon Jan 08 2001 - 02:43:40 EST)
  • Re: Are PCI add-on Cardbus Readers supported by the 2.4.0 kernel? David Hinds (Mon Jan 08 2001 - 11:24:16 EST)
• Re: devfs breakage in 2.4.0 release Andris Pavenis (Mon Jan 08 2001 - 02:47:25 EST)
  • Re: devfs breakage in 2.4.0 release Andris Pavenis (Fri Jan 12 2001 - 06:35:20 EST)
• Re: ramfs problem... (unlink of sparse file in "D" state) Alexander Viro (Mon Jan 08 2001 - 02:50:26 EST)
  • Re: ramfs problem... (unlink of sparse file in "D" state) Alexander Viro (Mon Jan 08 2001 - 02:56:10 EST)
    • Re: ramfs problem... (unlink of sparse file in "D" state) Chris Wedgwood (Mon Jan 08 2001 - 03:12:06 EST)
      • [PATCH(es)] Re: ramfs problem... (unlink of sparse file in "D" state) Alexander Viro (Mon Jan 08 2001 - 03:41:13 EST)
      • Re: ramfs problem... (unlink of sparse file in "D" state) Alan Cox (Mon Jan 08 2001 - 06:50:29 EST)
  • Re: ramfs problem... (unlink of sparse file in "D" state) Alan Cox (Mon Jan 08 2001 - 06:46:53 EST)
    • Re: ramfs problem... (unlink of sparse file in "D" state) Alexander Viro (Mon Jan 08 2001 - 06:50:20 EST)
      • Re: ramfs problem... (unlink of sparse file in "D" state) Alan Cox (Mon Jan 08 2001 - 07:09:36 EST)
      • Re: ramfs problem... (unlink of sparse file in "D" state) Alexander Viro (Mon Jan 08 2001 - 07:16:25 EST)
      • Re: ramfs problem... (unlink of sparse file in "D" state) Alan Cox (Mon Jan 08 2001 - 07:26:17 EST)
      • Re: ramfs problem... (unlink of sparse file in "D" state) Stefan Traby (Mon Jan 08 2001 - 08:17:21 EST)
      • Re: ramfs problem... (unlink of sparse file in "D" state) Alexander Viro (Mon Jan 08 2001 - 08:35:10 EST)
      • Re: ramfs problem... (unlink of sparse file in "D" state) Stefan Traby (Mon Jan 08 2001 - 09:00:11 EST)
      • Re: ramfs problem... (unlink of sparse file in "D" state) Alexander Viro (Mon Jan 08 2001 - 09:19:09 EST)
      • Re: ramfs problem... (unlink of sparse file in "D" state) Alan Cox (Mon Jan 08 2001 - 09:40:45 EST)
      • Re: ramfs problem... (unlink of sparse file in "D" state) Alexander Viro (Mon Jan 08 2001 - 09:52:20 EST)
      • Re: ramfs problem... (unlink of sparse file in "D" state) Alan Cox (Mon Jan 08 2001 - 10:09:01 EST)
      • Re: ramfs problem... (unlink of sparse file in "D" state) Alexander Viro (Mon Jan 08 2001 - 10:32:44 EST)
      • Re: ramfs problem... (unlink of sparse file in "D" state) Stefan Traby (Mon Jan 08 2001 - 10:55:41 EST)
      • Re: ramfs problem... (unlink of sparse file in "D" state) Alan Cox (Mon Jan 08 2001 - 11:01:10 EST)
      • Re: ramfs problem... (unlink of sparse file in "D" state) Stefan Traby (Mon Jan 08 2001 - 11:22:25 EST)
      • Re: ramfs problem... (unlink of sparse file in "D" state) Alan Cox (Mon Jan 08 2001 - 12:10:11 EST)
      • Re: ramfs problem... (unlink of sparse file in "D" state) Alexander Viro (Mon Jan 08 2001 - 13:05:49 EST)
      • Re: ramfs problem... (unlink of sparse file in "D" state) Stefan Traby (Mon Jan 08 2001 - 13:18:33 EST)
      • Re: ramfs problem... (unlink of sparse file in "D" state) Alexander Viro (Mon Jan 08 2001 - 13:22:49 EST)
      • Re: ramfs problem... (unlink of sparse file in "D" state) Stefan Traby (Mon Jan 08 2001 - 13:24:55 EST)
      • Re: ramfs problem... (unlink of sparse file in "D" state) Alexander Viro (Mon Jan 08 2001 - 13:33:50 EST)
      • Re: ramfs problem... (unlink of sparse file in "D" state) Stefan Traby (Mon Jan 08 2001 - 13:51:40 EST)
      • Re: ramfs problem... (unlink of sparse file in "D" state) Marc Lehmann (Mon Jan 08 2001 - 13:54:25 EST)
      • Re: ramfs problem... (unlink of sparse file in "D" state) Alexander Viro (Mon Jan 08 2001 - 14:07:31 EST)
      • Re: ramfs problem... (unlink of sparse file in "D" state) Alexander Viro (Mon Jan 08 2001 - 09:02:46 EST)
      • Re: ramfs problem... (unlink of sparse file in "D" state) Chris Mason (Mon Jan 08 2001 - 10:37:38 EST)
      • Re: ramfs problem... (unlink of sparse file in "D" state) Alexander Viro (Mon Jan 08 2001 - 10:47:41 EST)
      • Re: ramfs problem... (unlink of sparse file in "D" state) Chris Mason (Mon Jan 08 2001 - 11:11:55 EST)
      • Re: ramfs problem... (unlink of sparse file in "D" state) Alexander Viro (Mon Jan 08 2001 - 12:35:17 EST)
      • Re: ramfs problem... (unlink of sparse file in "D" state) Alan Cox (Mon Jan 08 2001 - 12:50:28 EST)
      • Re: ramfs problem... (unlink of sparse file in "D" state) Andreas Dilger (Mon Jan 08 2001 - 14:07:40 EST)
      • Re: ramfs problem... (unlink of sparse file in "D" state) Alexander Viro (Mon Jan 08 2001 - 15:12:40 EST)
      • Re: ramfs problem... (unlink of sparse file in "D" state) Andreas Dilger (Mon Jan 08 2001 - 15:38:39 EST)
    • Re: ramfs problem... (unlink of sparse file in "D" state) David Woodhouse (Mon Jan 08 2001 - 08:37:15 EST)
  • Re: ramfs problem... (unlink of sparse file in "D" state) Andries.Brouwer@cwi.nl (Mon Jan 08 2001 - 16:34:45 EST)
• Which Bind version.. Mike (Mon Jan 08 2001 - 02:56:37 EST)
  • Re: Which Bind version.. Chris Wedgwood (Mon Jan 08 2001 - 03:14:11 EST)
  • Re: Which Bind version.. Michael H. Warfield (Tue Jan 09 2001 - 07:15:41 EST)
• Re: CML2 0.9.1 is available Peter Loje Hansen (Mon Jan 08 2001 - 03:17:21 EST)
• VM subsystem bug in 2.4.0 ? Sergey E. Volkov (Mon Jan 08 2001 - 03:46:47 EST)
  • Re: VM subsystem bug in 2.4.0 ? Rik van Riel (Mon Jan 08 2001 - 13:00:45 EST)
    • Re: VM subsystem bug in 2.4.0 ? Linus Torvalds (Mon Jan 08 2001 - 13:10:53 EST)
      • Re: VM subsystem bug in 2.4.0 ? Rik van Riel (Mon Jan 08 2001 - 13:30:10 EST)
      • Re: VM subsystem bug in 2.4.0 ? Stephen C. Tweedie (Tue Jan 09 2001 - 09:09:32 EST)
      • Re: VM subsystem bug in 2.4.0 ? Linus Torvalds (Tue Jan 09 2001 - 13:23:36 EST)
      • Re: VM subsystem bug in 2.4.0 ? Christoph Rohland (Tue Jan 09 2001 - 17:20:09 EST)
      • Re: VM subsystem bug in 2.4.0 ? Linus Torvalds (Tue Jan 09 2001 - 17:59:07 EST)
      • Re: VM subsystem bug in 2.4.0 ? Christoph Rohland (Wed Jan 10 2001 - 02:33:47 EST)
      • Re: VM subsystem bug in 2.4.0 ? Tim Wright (Wed Jan 10 2001 - 10:50:20 EST)
  • Re: VM subsystem bug in 2.4.0 ? Christoph Rohland (Tue Jan 09 2001 - 02:52:59 EST)
  • Re: VM subsystem bug in 2.4.0 ? Christoph Rohland (Tue Jan 09 2001 - 09:53:55 EST)
    • Re: VM subsystem bug in 2.4.0 ? Stephen C. Tweedie (Tue Jan 09 2001 - 10:31:19 EST)
      • Re: VM subsystem bug in 2.4.0 ? Linus Torvalds (Tue Jan 09 2001 - 13:36:03 EST)
  • Re: VM subsystem bug in 2.4.0 ? Christoph Rohland (Tue Jan 09 2001 - 10:45:10 EST)
    • Re: VM subsystem bug in 2.4.0 ? Stephen C. Tweedie (Tue Jan 09 2001 - 11:05:11 EST)
      • Re: VM subsystem bug in 2.4.0 ? Christoph Rohland (Tue Jan 09 2001 - 11:17:12 EST)
      • Re: VM subsystem bug in 2.4.0 ? Linus Torvalds (Tue Jan 09 2001 - 13:37:44 EST)
      • Re: VM subsystem bug in 2.4.0 ? Daniel Phillips (Tue Jan 09 2001 - 11:45:19 EST)
• Re: Related VIA PCI crazyness? Philip Armstrong (Mon Jan 08 2001 - 04:08:03 EST)
  • Re: Related VIA PCI crazyness? Evan Thompson (Mon Jan 08 2001 - 19:53:09 EST)
  • Re: Related VIA PCI crazyness? Eric W. Biederman (Tue Jan 09 2001 - 01:06:08 EST)
  • Re: Related VIA PCI crazyness? Pete Toscano (Tue Jan 09 2001 - 12:19:54 EST)
  • Re: Related VIA PCI crazyness? Philip Armstrong (Wed Jan 10 2001 - 16:55:09 EST)
• Re: Kernel halts rock solid on assigning ip (ne2k-pci) Aschwin van der Woude (Mon Jan 08 2001 - 04:22:40 EST)
  • Re: Kernel halts rock solid on assigning ip (ne2k-pci) Aschwin van der Woude (Mon Jan 08 2001 - 04:33:28 EST)
• Re: Coppermine is a PIII or a Celeron? Giacomo Catenazzi (Mon Jan 08 2001 - 05:09:00 EST)
  • Re: Coppermine is a PIII or a Celeron? J . A . Magallon (Mon Jan 08 2001 - 09:12:34 EST)
  • Re: Coppermine is a PIII or a Celeron? Erik Mouw (Mon Jan 08 2001 - 16:25:35 EST)
• postgres/shm problem Narancs 1 (Mon Jan 08 2001 - 05:10:45 EST)
  • Re: postgres/shm problem manfred (Mon Jan 08 2001 - 05:41:02 EST)
  • Re: postgres/shm problem Nils Philippsen (Mon Jan 08 2001 - 05:46:05 EST)
    • Re: postgres/shm problem Narancs 1 (Mon Jan 08 2001 - 06:23:15 EST)
      • Re: postgres/shm problem Nils Philippsen (Mon Jan 08 2001 - 06:47:26 EST)
      • Re: postgres/shm problem Narancs 1 (Mon Jan 08 2001 - 07:05:33 EST)
  • Re: postgres/shm problem Alan Cox (Mon Jan 08 2001 - 06:58:51 EST)
• Re: 500 ms offset in i386 Real Time Clock setting Paul Gortmaker (Mon Jan 08 2001 - 04:59:36 EST)
• Re: Network Performance? Andrew Morton (Mon Jan 08 2001 - 05:26:23 EST)
  • Re: Network Performance? Tim Sailer (Mon Jan 08 2001 - 09:06:45 EST)
    • Re: Network Performance? Erik Mouw (Mon Jan 08 2001 - 13:07:18 EST)
      • Re: Network Performance? Tim Sailer (Tue Jan 09 2001 - 08:55:55 EST)
      • Re: Network Performance? Martin Josefsson (Tue Jan 09 2001 - 11:52:34 EST)
      • Re: Network Performance? Tim Sailer (Tue Jan 09 2001 - 13:35:21 EST)
    • Re: Network Performance? Craig I. Hagan (Mon Jan 08 2001 - 13:40:57 EST)
      • Re: Network Performance? Tim Sailer (Tue Jan 09 2001 - 10:29:38 EST)
    • Re: Network Performance? John Heffner (Mon Jan 08 2001 - 14:58:04 EST)
  • Re: Network Performance? Tim Sailer (Tue Jan 09 2001 - 11:53:02 EST)
    • Re: Network Performance? John Heffner (Tue Jan 09 2001 - 14:29:36 EST)
      • Re: Network Performance? Tim Sailer (Tue Jan 09 2001 - 15:56:11 EST)
      • Re: Network Performance? Pekka Pietikainen (Thu Jan 11 2001 - 05:00:48 EST)
• Re: [PLEASE-TESTME] Zerocopy networking patch, 2.4.0-1 Christoph Hellwig (Mon Jan 08 2001 - 05:39:15 EST)
  • Re: [PLEASE-TESTME] Zerocopy networking patch, 2.4.0-1 David S. Miller (Mon Jan 08 2001 - 05:34:52 EST)
    • Re: [PLEASE-TESTME] Zerocopy networking patch, 2.4.0-1 Rik van Riel (Mon Jan 08 2001 - 13:05:23 EST)
      • Re: [PLEASE-TESTME] Zerocopy networking patch, 2.4.0-1 David S. Miller (Mon Jan 08 2001 - 16:07:02 EST)
      • Re: [PLEASE-TESTME] Zerocopy networking patch, 2.4.0-1 Ingo Molnar (Tue Jan 09 2001 - 05:23:41 EST)
      • Re: [PLEASE-TESTME] Zerocopy networking patch, 2.4.0-1 Christoph Hellwig (Tue Jan 09 2001 - 05:31:45 EST)
      • Re: [PLEASE-TESTME] Zerocopy networking patch, 2.4.0-1 David S. Miller (Tue Jan 09 2001 - 05:31:13 EST)
      • Re: [PLEASE-TESTME] Zerocopy networking patch, 2.4.0-1 Christoph Hellwig (Tue Jan 09 2001 - 06:28:10 EST)
      • Re: [PLEASE-TESTME] Zerocopy networking patch, 2.4.0-1 David S. Miller (Tue Jan 09 2001 - 06:42:47 EST)
      • Re: [PLEASE-TESTME] Zerocopy networking patch, 2.4.0-1 Ingo Molnar (Tue Jan 09 2001 - 07:04:49 EST)
      • Re: [PLEASE-TESTME] Zerocopy networking patch, 2.4.0-1 Stephen C. Tweedie (Tue Jan 09 2001 - 09:25:42 EST)
      • Re: [PLEASE-TESTME] Zerocopy networking patch, 2.4.0-1 Alan Cox (Tue Jan 09 2001 - 09:33:13 EST)
      • Re: [PLEASE-TESTME] Zerocopy networking patch, 2.4.0-1 Ingo Molnar (Tue Jan 09 2001 - 10:00:34 EST)
      • Re: [PLEASE-TESTME] Zerocopy networking patch, 2.4.0-1 Stephen C. Tweedie (Tue Jan 09 2001 - 10:27:02 EST)
      • Re: [PLEASE-TESTME] Zerocopy networking patch, 2.4.0-1 Ingo Molnar (Tue Jan 09 2001 - 11:16:40 EST)
      • Re: [PLEASE-TESTME] Zerocopy networking patch, 2.4.0-1 Alan Cox (Tue Jan 09 2001 - 11:37:32 EST)
      • Re: [PLEASE-TESTME] Zerocopy networking patch, 2.4.0-1 Ingo Molnar (Tue Jan 09 2001 - 11:48:32 EST)
      • Re: [PLEASE-TESTME] Zerocopy networking patch, 2.4.0-1 Alan Cox (Tue Jan 09 2001 - 12:29:29 EST)
      • Re: [PLEASE-TESTME] Zerocopy networking patch, 2.4.0-1 Jens Axboe (Tue Jan 09 2001 - 12:38:08 EST)
      • Re: [PLEASE-TESTME] Zerocopy networking patch, 2.4.0-1 Ingo Molnar (Tue Jan 09 2001 - 13:38:28 EST)
      • Re: [PLEASE-TESTME] Zerocopy networking patch, 2.4.0-1 Andrea Arcangeli (Tue Jan 09 2001 - 14:54:20 EST)
      • Re: [PLEASE-TESTME] Zerocopy networking patch, 2.4.0-1 Ingo Molnar (Tue Jan 09 2001 - 15:10:24 EST)
      • Re: [PLEASE-TESTME] Zerocopy networking patch, 2.4.0-1 Andrea Arcangeli (Tue Jan 09 2001 - 19:00:53 EST)
      • Re: [PLEASE-TESTME] Zerocopy networking patch, 2.4.0-1 Jens Axboe (Tue Jan 09 2001 - 15:12:04 EST)
      • Re: [PLEASE-TESTME] Zerocopy networking patch, 2.4.0-1 Andrea Arcangeli (Tue Jan 09 2001 - 18:20:19 EST)
      • Re: [PLEASE-TESTME] Zerocopy networking patch, 2.4.0-1 Jens Axboe (Tue Jan 09 2001 - 18:34:35 EST)
      • Re: [PLEASE-TESTME] Zerocopy networking patch, 2.4.0-1 Andrea Arcangeli (Tue Jan 09 2001 - 18:52:41 EST)
      • Re: [PLEASE-TESTME] Zerocopy networking patch, 2.4.0-1 Chris Evans (Tue Jan 09 2001 - 12:56:11 EST)
      • Re: [PLEASE-TESTME] Zerocopy networking patch, 2.4.0-1 Ingo Molnar (Tue Jan 09 2001 - 13:41:12 EST)
      • [patch]: ac4 blk (was Re: [PLEASE-TESTME] Zerocopy networking patch, 2.4.0-1) Jens Axboe (Tue Jan 09 2001 - 17:58:30 EST)
      • Re: [PLEASE-TESTME] Zerocopy networking patch, 2.4.0-1 J Sloan (Tue Jan 09 2001 - 14:20:14 EST)
      • Re: [PLEASE-TESTME] Zerocopy networking patch, 2.4.0-1 Stephen C. Tweedie (Tue Jan 09 2001 - 13:10:43 EST)
      • Re: [PLEASE-TESTME] Zerocopy networking patch, 2.4.0-1 Benjamin C.R. LaHaise (Tue Jan 09 2001 - 10:38:30 EST)
      • Re: [PLEASE-TESTME] Zerocopy networking patch, 2.4.0-1 Ingo Molnar (Tue Jan 09 2001 - 11:40:06 EST)
      • Re: [PLEASE-TESTME] Zerocopy networking patch, 2.4.0-1 Benjamin C.R. LaHaise (Tue Jan 09 2001 - 12:30:39 EST)
      • Re: [PLEASE-TESTME] Zerocopy networking patch, 2.4.0-1 Stephen C. Tweedie (Tue Jan 09 2001 - 13:12:24 EST)
      • Re: [PLEASE-TESTME] Zerocopy networking patch, 2.4.0-1 Ingo Molnar (Tue Jan 09 2001 - 13:35:28 EST)
      • Re: [PLEASE-TESTME] Zerocopy networking patch, 2.4.0-1 Christoph Hellwig (Tue Jan 09 2001 - 12:53:10 EST)
      • Re: [PLEASE-TESTME] Zerocopy networking patch, 2.4.0-1 David S. Miller (Tue Jan 09 2001 - 16:13:52 EST)
      • Re: [PLEASE-TESTME] Zerocopy networking patch, 2.4.0-1 Linus Torvalds (Tue Jan 09 2001 - 14:14:54 EST)
      • Re: [PLEASE-TESTME] Zerocopy networking patch, 2.4.0-1 Ingo Molnar (Tue Jan 09 2001 - 15:07:17 EST)
      • Re: [PLEASE-TESTME] Zerocopy networking patch, 2.4.0-1 Linus Torvalds (Tue Jan 09 2001 - 15:15:43 EST)
      • Re: [PLEASE-TESTME] Zerocopy networking patch, 2.4.0-1 Christoph Hellwig (Tue Jan 09 2001 - 15:36:34 EST)
      • Re: [PLEASE-TESTME] Zerocopy networking patch, 2.4.0-1 Linus Torvalds (Tue Jan 09 2001 - 15:55:51 EST)
      • Re: [PLEASE-TESTME] Zerocopy networking patch, 2.4.0-1 Christoph Hellwig (Tue Jan 09 2001 - 16:12:55 EST)
      • Re: [PLEASE-TESTME] Zerocopy networking patch, 2.4.0-1 Linus Torvalds (Tue Jan 09 2001 - 16:26:44 EST)
      • Re: [PLEASE-TESTME] Zerocopy networking patch, 2.4.0-1 Christoph Hellwig (Wed Jan 10 2001 - 02:42:35 EST)
      • Re: [PLEASE-TESTME] Zerocopy networking patch, 2.4.0-1 Linus Torvalds (Wed Jan 10 2001 - 03:05:01 EST)
      • Re: [PLEASE-TESTME] Zerocopy networking patch, 2.4.0-1 Andrew Morton (Wed Jan 10 2001 - 03:37:56 EST)
      • Re: [PLEASE-TESTME] Zerocopy networking patch, 2.4.0-1 Linus Torvalds (Wed Jan 10 2001 - 18:32:59 EST)
      • Re: [PLEASE-TESTME] Zerocopy networking patch, 2.4.0-1 Christoph Hellwig (Wed Jan 10 2001 - 03:33:08 EST)
      • Re: [PLEASE-TESTME] Zerocopy networking patch, 2.4.0-1 Benjamin C.R. LaHaise (Tue Jan 09 2001 - 18:06:05 EST)
      • Re: [PLEASE-TESTME] Zerocopy networking patch, 2.4.0-1 Linus Torvalds (Tue Jan 09 2001 - 18:54:20 EST)
      • Re: [PLEASE-TESTME] Zerocopy networking patch, 2.4.0-1 Gerd Knorr (Wed Jan 10 2001 - 02:51:11 EST)
      • Re: [PLEASE-TESTME] Zerocopy networking patch, 2.4.0-1 Stephen C. Tweedie (Thu Jan 11 2001 - 20:42:47 EST)
      • Re: [PLEASE-TESTME] Zerocopy networking patch, 2.4.0-1 Ingo Molnar (Tue Jan 09 2001 - 06:05:59 EST)
      • Re: [PLEASE-TESTME] Zerocopy networking patch, 2.4.0-1 Christoph Hellwig (Tue Jan 09 2001 - 13:27:07 EST)
      • Re: [PLEASE-TESTME] Zerocopy networking patch, 2.4.0-1 Ingo Molnar (Tue Jan 09 2001 - 14:19:44 EST)
      • Re: [PLEASE-TESTME] Zerocopy networking patch, 2.4.0-1 Stephen C. Tweedie (Tue Jan 09 2001 - 09:18:06 EST)
      • Re: [PLEASE-TESTME] Zerocopy networking patch, 2.4.0-1 Ingo Molnar (Tue Jan 09 2001 - 09:40:56 EST)
      • Re: [PLEASE-TESTME] Zerocopy networking patch, 2.4.0-1 Alan Cox (Tue Jan 09 2001 - 09:51:28 EST)
      • Re: [PLEASE-TESTME] Zerocopy networking patch, 2.4.0-1 Stephen C. Tweedie (Tue Jan 09 2001 - 10:17:25 EST)
      • Re: [PLEASE-TESTME] Zerocopy networking patch, 2.4.0-1 Ingo Molnar (Tue Jan 09 2001 - 10:37:26 EST)
      • Re: [PLEASE-TESTME] Zerocopy networking patch, 2.4.0-1 David S. Miller (Tue Jan 09 2001 - 16:18:06 EST)
      • Re: [PLEASE-TESTME] Zerocopy networking patch, 2.4.0-1 Linus Torvalds (Tue Jan 09 2001 - 17:25:43 EST)
      • Re: [PLEASE-TESTME] Zerocopy networking patch, 2.4.0-1 Stephen C. Tweedie (Wed Jan 10 2001 - 10:21:58 EST)
      • Re: [PLEASE-TESTME] Zerocopy networking patch, 2.4.0-1 Stephen Frost (Tue Jan 09 2001 - 10:25:25 EST)
      • Re: [PLEASE-TESTME] Zerocopy networking patch, 2.4.0-1 Ingo Molnar (Tue Jan 09 2001 - 10:40:46 EST)
      • Re: [PLEASE-TESTME] Zerocopy networking patch, 2.4.0-1 Stephen Frost (Tue Jan 09 2001 - 10:48:00 EST)
      • Re: [PLEASE-TESTME] Zerocopy networking patch, 2.4.0-1 Dave Zarzycki (Tue Jan 09 2001 - 20:14:33 EST)
      • Re: [PLEASE-TESTME] Zerocopy networking patch, 2.4.0-1 Ingo Molnar (Tue Jan 09 2001 - 20:19:20 EST)
      • Re: [PLEASE-TESTME] Zerocopy networking patch, 2.4.0-1 David S. Miller (Tue Jan 09 2001 - 20:14:51 EST)
      • Re: [PLEASE-TESTME] Zerocopy networking patch, 2.4.0-1 Dave Zarzycki (Tue Jan 09 2001 - 21:18:05 EST)
      • storage over IP (was Re: [PLEASE-TESTME] Zerocopy networking patch, 2.4.0-1) dean gaudet (Tue Jan 09 2001 - 21:56:33 EST)
      • Re: storage over IP (was Re: [PLEASE-TESTME] Zerocopy networking patch, Alan Cox (Tue Jan 09 2001 - 22:05:45 EST)
      • Re: storage over IP (was Re: [PLEASE-TESTME] Zerocopy networking patch, Cacophonix (Tue Jan 09 2001 - 23:18:15 EST)
      • Re: storage over IP (was Re: [PLEASE-TESTME] Zerocopy networking patch, 2.4.0-1) David S. Miller (Tue Jan 09 2001 - 21:58:07 EST)
      • Re: storage over IP (was Re: [PLEASE-TESTME] Zerocopy networking patch, 2.4.0-1) dean gaudet (Tue Jan 09 2001 - 22:18:53 EST)
      • Re: storage over IP (was Re: [PLEASE-TESTME] Zerocopy networking patch, 2.4.0-1) David S. Miller (Tue Jan 09 2001 - 22:09:59 EST)
  • Re: [PLEASE-TESTME] Zerocopy networking patch, 2.4.0-1 Jes Sorensen (Mon Jan 08 2001 - 16:56:48 EST)
    • Re: [PLEASE-TESTME] Zerocopy networking patch, 2.4.0-1 David S. Miller (Mon Jan 08 2001 - 16:48:08 EST)
  • Re: [PLEASE-TESTME] Zerocopy networking patch, 2.4.0-1 Jes Sorensen (Mon Jan 08 2001 - 17:32:48 EST)
    • Re: [PLEASE-TESTME] Zerocopy networking patch, 2.4.0-1 Stephen Frost (Mon Jan 08 2001 - 17:43:56 EST)
      • Re: [PLEASE-TESTME] Zerocopy networking patch, 2.4.0-1 David S. Miller (Mon Jan 08 2001 - 17:37:23 EST)
    • Re: [PLEASE-TESTME] Zerocopy networking patch, 2.4.0-1 David S. Miller (Mon Jan 08 2001 - 17:36:26 EST)
      • Re: [PLEASE-TESTME] Zerocopy networking patch, 2.4.0-1 Ingo Molnar (Tue Jan 09 2001 - 07:12:28 EST)
  • Re: [PLEASE-TESTME] Zerocopy networking patch, 2.4.0-1 Stephen Landamore (Tue Jan 09 2001 - 08:08:26 EST)
    • Re: [PLEASE-TESTME] Zerocopy networking patch, 2.4.0-1 Ingo Molnar (Tue Jan 09 2001 - 08:24:50 EST)
      • Re: [PLEASE-TESTME] Zerocopy networking patch, 2.4.0-1 Andrew Morton (Tue Jan 09 2001 - 08:47:55 EST)
      • Re: [PLEASE-TESTME] Zerocopy networking patch, 2.4.0-1 Dan Hollis (Tue Jan 09 2001 - 14:15:33 EST)
      • Re: [PLEASE-TESTME] Zerocopy networking patch, 2.4.0-1 Dan Hollis (Tue Jan 09 2001 - 14:14:05 EST)
      • Re: [PLEASE-TESTME] Zerocopy networking patch, 2.4.0-1 David S. Miller (Tue Jan 09 2001 - 17:03:47 EST)
      • Re: [PLEASE-TESTME] Zerocopy networking patch, 2.4.0-1 Dan Hollis (Tue Jan 09 2001 - 17:58:28 EST)
      • Re: [PLEASE-TESTME] Zerocopy networking patch, 2.4.0-1 Ingo Molnar (Tue Jan 09 2001 - 17:59:13 EST)
      • Re: [PLEASE-TESTME] Zerocopy networking patch, 2.4.0-1 Dan Hollis (Tue Jan 09 2001 - 18:11:34 EST)
      • Re: [PLEASE-TESTME] Zerocopy networking patch, 2.4.0-1 Chris Wedgwood (Tue Jan 09 2001 - 22:24:26 EST)
  • Re: [PLEASE-TESTME] Zerocopy networking patch, 2.4.0-1 Trond Myklebust (Tue Jan 09 2001 - 08:52:40 EST)
    • Re: [PLEASE-TESTME] Zerocopy networking patch, 2.4.0-1 David S. Miller (Tue Jan 09 2001 - 08:42:48 EST)
      • Re: [PLEASE-TESTME] Zerocopy networking patch, 2.4.0-1 Trond Myklebust (Tue Jan 09 2001 - 10:27:49 EST)
      • Re: [PLEASE-TESTME] Zerocopy networking patch, 2.4.0-1 David S. Miller (Tue Jan 09 2001 - 16:19:28 EST)
      • Re: [PLEASE-TESTME] Zerocopy networking patch, 2.4.0-1 Trond Myklebust (Wed Jan 10 2001 - 04:21:52 EST)
  • Re: [PLEASE-TESTME] Zerocopy networking patch, 2.4.0-1 Manfred Spraul (Tue Jan 09 2001 - 12:46:50 EST)
  • Re: [PLEASE-TESTME] Zerocopy networking patch, 2.4.0-1 Manfred Spraul (Wed Jan 10 2001 - 03:41:24 EST)
    • Re: [PLEASE-TESTME] Zerocopy networking patch, 2.4.0-1 David S. Miller (Wed Jan 10 2001 - 03:31:09 EST)
    • Re: [PLEASE-TESTME] Zerocopy networking patch, 2.4.0-1 Ingo Molnar (Wed Jan 10 2001 - 06:25:52 EST)
      • Re: [PLEASE-TESTME] Zerocopy networking patch, 2.4.0-1 Manfred Spraul (Wed Jan 10 2001 - 07:03:56 EST)
      • Re: [PLEASE-TESTME] Zerocopy networking patch, 2.4.0-1 Ingo Molnar (Wed Jan 10 2001 - 07:07:53 EST)
      • Re: [PLEASE-TESTME] Zerocopy networking patch, 2.4.0-1 Jamie Lokier (Wed Jan 10 2001 - 11:18:28 EST)
    • Re: [PLEASE-TESTME] Zerocopy networking patch, 2.4.0-1 yodaiken@fsmlabs.com (Sat Jan 13 2001 - 10:43:17 EST)
• Extraneous whitespace removal? Jeremy M. Dolan (Mon Jan 08 2001 - 05:42:18 EST)
  • Re: Extraneous whitespace removal? David Weinehall (Mon Jan 08 2001 - 06:29:49 EST)
  • Re: Extraneous whitespace removal? Thomas Pornin (Mon Jan 08 2001 - 06:50:52 EST)
  • Re: Extraneous whitespace removal? Rusty Russell (Mon Jan 08 2001 - 19:24:20 EST)
• Re: APIC-ERROR-Messages - Helge Hafting (Mon Jan 08 2001 - 05:50:21 EST)
• Re: Kdb for modules Guennadi Liakhovetski (Mon Jan 08 2001 - 05:57:32 EST)
  • Re: Kdb for modules Keith Owens (Mon Jan 08 2001 - 09:54:24 EST)
• Re: setfsuid on ext2 weirdness (2.4) Alan Cox (Mon Jan 08 2001 - 06:02:09 EST)
  • Re: setfsuid on ext2 weirdness (2.4) Linus Torvalds (Mon Jan 08 2001 - 15:21:15 EST)
    • Re: setfsuid on ext2 weirdness (2.4) Kai Henningsen (Mon Jan 08 2001 - 16:39:00 EST)
  • Re: setfsuid on ext2 weirdness (2.4) Bjorn Wesen (Mon Jan 08 2001 - 15:31:53 EST)
• 2.4.0 - small success Guennadi Liakhovetski (Mon Jan 08 2001 - 06:06:41 EST)
• RE: [PTACH] wrong stat of NTFS volume in linux-kernel 2.4.0 Anton Altaparmakov (Mon Jan 08 2001 - 06:20:26 EST)
• WaitForSingleObject in linux????.. MOHAMMED AZAD (Mon Jan 08 2001 - 06:34:55 EST)
• Module Sourav Sen (Mon Jan 08 2001 - 06:57:07 EST)
• Re: [PATCH] Cleanup of PCI device reporting in IDE driver (2.4.0) Martin Mares (Mon Jan 08 2001 - 06:58:25 EST)
• Re: Journaling: Surviving or allowing unclean shutdown? Stephen C. Tweedie (Mon Jan 08 2001 - 07:02:49 EST)
  • Re: Journaling: Surviving or allowing unclean shutdown? Pavel Machek (Fri Jan 05 2001 - 17:05:46 EST)
  • Re: Journaling: Surviving or allowing unclean shutdown? Pavel Machek (Fri Jan 05 2001 - 17:09:50 EST)
  • Re: Journaling: Surviving or allowing unclean shutdown? Bernd Eckenfels (Mon Jan 08 2001 - 18:19:53 EST)
  • Re: Journaling: Surviving or allowing unclean shutdown? Roger Gammans (Tue Jan 09 2001 - 04:34:14 EST)
• Re: Compilation error in Red Hat 6.2 mpradhan@healthnet.org.np (Mon Jan 08 2001 - 07:34:56 EST)
• [PATCH] cramfs is ro only, so honour this in inode->mode Ingo Oeser (Mon Jan 08 2001 - 08:17:02 EST)
  • Re: [PATCH] cramfs is ro only, so honour this in inode->mode Shane Nay (Mon Jan 08 2001 - 07:13:39 EST)
    • Re: [PATCH] cramfs is ro only, so honour this in inode->mode Ingo Oeser (Mon Jan 08 2001 - 09:29:04 EST)
      • Re: [PATCH] cramfs is ro only, so honour this in inode->mode Alexander Viro (Mon Jan 08 2001 - 08:42:35 EST)
      • Re: [PATCH] cramfs is ro only, so honour this in inode->mode Ingo Oeser (Mon Jan 08 2001 - 11:59:17 EST)
      • Re: [PATCH] cramfs is ro only, so honour this in inode->mode Shane Nay (Mon Jan 08 2001 - 08:17:12 EST)
      • Re: [PATCH] cramfs is ro only, so honour this in inode->mode Albert D. Cahalan (Tue Jan 09 2001 - 06:16:23 EST)
      • Re: [PATCH] cramfs is ro only, so honour this in inode->mode Linus Torvalds (Mon Jan 08 2001 - 12:37:03 EST)
      • Re: [PATCH] cramfs is ro only, so honour this in inode->mode Rusty Russell (Mon Jan 08 2001 - 20:25:58 EST)
      • Re: [PATCH] cramfs is ro only, so honour this in inode->mode Linus Torvalds (Mon Jan 08 2001 - 21:54:05 EST)
  • Re: [PATCH] cramfs is ro only, so honour this in inode->mode Linus Torvalds (Mon Jan 08 2001 - 12:12:58 EST)
  • Re: [PATCH] cramfs is ro only, so honour this in inode->mode Doug McNaught (Tue Jan 09 2001 - 09:14:10 EST)
    • Re: [PATCH] cramfs is ro only, so honour this in inode->mode Albert D. Cahalan (Tue Jan 09 2001 - 17:03:50 EST)
  • Re: [PATCH] cramfs is ro only, so honour this in inode->mode Doug McNaught (Tue Jan 09 2001 - 17:33:29 EST)
• Did anybody have compiled nvidia driver with 2.4.0. (final) kernel ? Blizbor (Mon Jan 08 2001 - 07:21:51 EST)
• Re: [PATCH] Fix compile warnings in 2.4.0 Rich Baum (Mon Jan 08 2001 - 07:38:10 EST)
• Re: Announce: modutils 2.4.0 is available Peter Samuelson (Mon Jan 08 2001 - 07:41:57 EST)
• 2.4.0-ac3 oneliners Bruce Harada (Mon Jan 08 2001 - 07:48:39 EST)
• Re: Linux 2.4.0-ac4 Eyal Lebedinsky (Mon Jan 08 2001 - 07:49:49 EST)
  • Re: Linux 2.4.0-ac4 J . A . Magallon (Tue Jan 09 2001 - 19:19:38 EST)
• [OT] Re: WaitForSingleObject in linux????.. Manfred Spraul (Mon Jan 08 2001 - 07:56:11 EST)
• Re: routable interfaces WAS( Re: [PATCH] hashed device lookup(DoesNOTmeet Linus' sumission policy!) jamal (Mon Jan 08 2001 - 08:05:49 EST)
• suggest: diff-2.4.0-test12_to_2.4.0 Ulrich Windl (Mon Jan 08 2001 - 08:06:53 EST)
  • Re: suggest: diff-2.4.0-test12_to_2.4.0 Andreas Jaeger (Mon Jan 08 2001 - 08:16:31 EST)
    • Re: suggest: diff-2.4.0-test12_to_2.4.0 Ulrich Windl (Mon Jan 08 2001 - 08:52:39 EST)
  • Re: suggest: diff-2.4.0-test12_to_2.4.0 stefan mojschewitsch (Mon Jan 08 2001 - 08:31:14 EST)
    • Re: suggest: diff-2.4.0-test12_to_2.4.0 stefan mojschewitsch (Mon Jan 08 2001 - 08:41:06 EST)
• Re: Bug: Frame-buffer (icon) rotates right in 2.4.0 when SMP Cajus Pollmeier (Mon Jan 08 2001 - 05:26:29 EST)
• PATCH for 2.4.0: assign ad1848 mixer operations to correct module Chris Rankin (Mon Jan 08 2001 - 08:08:44 EST)
  • Re: PATCH for 2.4.0: assign ad1848 mixer operations to correct module Alan Cox (Mon Jan 08 2001 - 09:37:29 EST)
    • Re: PATCH for 2.4.0: assign ad1848 mixer operations to correct module Chris Rankin (Mon Jan 08 2001 - 12:33:49 EST)
• Delay in authentication. Ansari (Mon Jan 08 2001 - 08:39:34 EST)
  • Re: Delay in authentication. David S. Miller (Mon Jan 08 2001 - 08:31:54 EST)
    • Re: Delay in authentication. Chris Meadors (Mon Jan 08 2001 - 09:21:06 EST)
      • Re: Delay in authentication. Igmar Palsenberg (Mon Jan 08 2001 - 11:26:42 EST)
      • Re: Delay in authentication. Chris Meadors (Mon Jan 08 2001 - 11:09:26 EST)
      • Re: Delay in authentication. Scott Laird (Mon Jan 08 2001 - 15:54:04 EST)
      • Re: Delay in authentication. Chris Meadors (Tue Jan 09 2001 - 10:19:23 EST)
      • Re: Delay in authentication. Igmar Palsenberg (Tue Jan 09 2001 - 19:21:53 EST)
      • Re: Delay in authentication. M.H.VanLeeuwen (Mon Jan 08 2001 - 16:24:55 EST)
      • Re: Delay in authentication. David S. Miller (Mon Jan 08 2001 - 16:17:36 EST)
      • Re: Delay in authentication.gy Alan Cox (Mon Jan 08 2001 - 17:01:26 EST)
      • Re: Delay in authentication.gy David S. Miller (Mon Jan 08 2001 - 16:50:29 EST)
      • Re: Delay in authentication.gy Andi Kleen (Mon Jan 08 2001 - 23:37:13 EST)
      • Re: Delay in authentication.gy Chris Meadors (Mon Jan 15 2001 - 15:37:37 EST)
    • Re: Delay in authentication. Ansari (Mon Jan 08 2001 - 09:16:38 EST)
• 2.4: header file confusion (interrupts) Ulrich Windl (Mon Jan 08 2001 - 08:58:16 EST)
• Mouse problem on VIA chipset mobo Antonio Miguel Trindade (Mon Jan 08 2001 - 09:00:01 EST)
• [PATCH] tulip Peter De Schrijver (Mon Jan 08 2001 - 09:01:08 EST)
  • Re: [PATCH] tulip Matti Aarnio (Mon Jan 08 2001 - 09:11:19 EST)
    • Re: [PATCH] tulip Peter De Schrijver (Mon Jan 08 2001 - 09:33:36 EST)
• (no subject) Wayne.Brown@altec.com (Mon Jan 08 2001 - 09:20:30 EST)
  • (no subject) Robert Kaiser (Tue Jan 09 2001 - 17:57:52 EST)
  • (no subject) Eko Sulistiono (Tue Jan 09 2001 - 20:40:36 EST)
  • (no subject) Thiago Rondon (Wed Jan 10 2001 - 13:24:21 EST)
    • Re: ds patch Dan Aloni (Wed Jan 10 2001 - 16:30:17 EST)
    • Re: your mail David Hinds (Wed Jan 10 2001 - 23:08:41 EST)
  • (no subject) flyinglinux (Fri Jan 12 2001 - 00:52:34 EST)
  • (no subject) mshiju@in.ibm.com (Sat Jan 13 2001 - 04:10:56 EST)
  • (no subject) Friedrich Lindenberg (Sun Jan 14 2001 - 11:46:08 EST)
  • (no subject) Dan Merillat (Mon Jan 15 2001 - 01:56:13 EST)
• 2.4.0 - sndstat not present Martin Laberge (Mon Jan 08 2001 - 09:23:19 EST)
  • Re: 2.4.0 - sndstat not present Christoph Hellwig (Mon Jan 08 2001 - 10:18:44 EST)
    • Re: 2.4.0 - sndstat not present Martin Laberge (Mon Jan 08 2001 - 10:30:39 EST)
      • Re: 2.4.0 - sndstat not present Christoph Hellwig (Mon Jan 08 2001 - 10:45:37 EST)
• Revised patch: Linux 2.4.0 ad1848 mixer ownership Chris Rankin (Mon Jan 08 2001 - 09:41:56 EST)
• Ext2 descriptor corruption in 2.4.0 Daniel Phillips (Mon Jan 08 2001 - 09:50:12 EST)
• Re: 2.2.18 and Maxtor 96147H6 (61 GB) Igmar Palsenberg (Mon Jan 08 2001 - 11:04:58 EST)
  • Re: 2.2.18 and Maxtor 96147H6 (61 GB) Andries.Brouwer@cwi.nl (Mon Jan 08 2001 - 10:56:51 EST)
    • Re: 2.2.18 and Maxtor 96147H6 (61 GB) Igmar Palsenberg (Tue Jan 09 2001 - 19:09:31 EST)
  • Re: 2.2.18 and Maxtor 96147H6 (61 GB) Andries.Brouwer@cwi.nl (Tue Jan 09 2001 - 18:43:24 EST)
    • Re: 2.2.18 and Maxtor 96147H6 (61 GB) Igmar Palsenberg (Wed Jan 10 2001 - 08:55:59 EST)
• RE: USB broken in 2.4.0 Heitzso (Mon Jan 08 2001 - 10:38:31 EST)
  • Re: USB broken in 2.4.0 antirez (Mon Jan 08 2001 - 12:54:47 EST)
• Announce: modutils 2.4.1 is available Keith Owens (Mon Jan 08 2001 - 10:52:28 EST)
  • Announce: updated USB hotplug support David Brownell (Mon Jan 08 2001 - 16:41:36 EST)
• Re: ext3fs 0.0.5d and reiserfs 3.5.2x mutually exclusive Stephen C. Tweedie (Mon Jan 08 2001 - 11:43:45 EST)
• Re: The advantage of modules? Michael Meissner (Mon Jan 08 2001 - 11:47:34 EST)
  • Re: The advantage of modules? Michael Meissner (Mon Jan 08 2001 - 11:49:29 EST)
  • Re: The advantage of modules? Ookhoi (Mon Jan 08 2001 - 13:26:01 EST)
    • Re: The advantage of modules? Michael Meissner (Mon Jan 08 2001 - 14:05:21 EST)
      • Re: The advantage of modules? Russell King (Mon Jan 08 2001 - 16:50:55 EST)
      • Re: The advantage of modules? Dan Hollis (Mon Jan 08 2001 - 17:16:05 EST)
      • Re: The advantage of modules? Russell King (Mon Jan 08 2001 - 17:14:25 EST)
      • Re: The advantage of modules? Dan Hollis (Mon Jan 08 2001 - 17:40:58 EST)
      • Re: The advantage of modules? Richard B. Johnson (Mon Jan 08 2001 - 18:06:25 EST)
      • Re: The advantage of modules? Alan Cox (Mon Jan 08 2001 - 18:49:16 EST)
• 'console=' kernel parameter questions Paul Powell (Mon Jan 08 2001 - 11:50:50 EST)
  • Re: 'console=' kernel parameter questions Matthew Kirkwood (Mon Jan 08 2001 - 12:15:27 EST)
  • Re: 'console=' kernel parameter questions Mohammad A. Haque (Mon Jan 08 2001 - 12:24:20 EST)
  • Re: 'console=' kernel parameter questions Dr. Kelsey Hudson (Tue Jan 09 2001 - 18:09:30 EST)
• Re: .br blacklisted ? Rik van Riel (Mon Jan 08 2001 - 11:59:22 EST)
  • Re: .br blacklisted ? David Ford (Tue Jan 09 2001 - 23:11:12 EST)
• `rmdir .` doesn't work in 2.4 Andrea Arcangeli (Mon Jan 08 2001 - 12:08:57 EST)
  • Re: `rmdir .` doesn't work in 2.4 Mohammad A. Haque (Mon Jan 08 2001 - 12:31:29 EST)
    • Re: `rmdir .` doesn't work in 2.4 Andrea Arcangeli (Mon Jan 08 2001 - 12:55:18 EST)
      • Re: `rmdir .` doesn't work in 2.4 Alexander Viro (Mon Jan 08 2001 - 13:04:24 EST)
      • Re: `rmdir .` doesn't work in 2.4 Andrea Arcangeli (Mon Jan 08 2001 - 15:30:36 EST)
      • Re: `rmdir .` doesn't work in 2.4 Alexander Viro (Mon Jan 08 2001 - 16:08:58 EST)
      • Re: `rmdir .` doesn't work in 2.4 Andrea Arcangeli (Mon Jan 08 2001 - 16:56:05 EST)
      • Re: `rmdir .` doesn't work in 2.4 Linus Torvalds (Mon Jan 08 2001 - 18:28:29 EST)
      • Re: `rmdir .` doesn't work in 2.4 Stefan Traby (Tue Jan 09 2001 - 03:09:36 EST)
      • Re: `rmdir .` doesn't work in 2.4 Eric Lammerts (Tue Jan 09 2001 - 05:48:53 EST)
      • Re: `rmdir .` doesn't work in 2.4 Albert D. Cahalan (Tue Jan 09 2001 - 04:31:24 EST)
      • Re: `rmdir .` doesn't work in 2.4 Alexander Viro (Tue Jan 09 2001 - 10:00:52 EST)
      • Re: `rmdir .` doesn't work in 2.4 Albert D. Cahalan (Tue Jan 09 2001 - 15:59:09 EST)
      • Re: `rmdir .` doesn't work in 2.4 Alexander Viro (Tue Jan 09 2001 - 16:42:00 EST)
      • Re: `rmdir .` doesn't work in 2.4 Linus Torvalds (Mon Jan 08 2001 - 18:27:21 EST)
      • Re: `rmdir .` doesn't work in 2.4 Andrea Arcangeli (Mon Jan 08 2001 - 19:01:25 EST)
      • Re: `rmdir .` doesn't work in 2.4 Stephen C. Tweedie (Tue Jan 09 2001 - 08:50:31 EST)
  • Re: `rmdir .` doesn't work in 2.4 Alexander Viro (Mon Jan 08 2001 - 12:58:20 EST)
    • Re: `rmdir .` doesn't work in 2.4 Andrea Arcangeli (Mon Jan 08 2001 - 15:28:33 EST)
      • Re: `rmdir .` doesn't work in 2.4 Stephen C. Tweedie (Tue Jan 09 2001 - 08:52:26 EST)
    • Re: `rmdir .` doesn't work in 2.4 Stefan Traby (Mon Jan 08 2001 - 16:54:51 EST)
      • Re: `rmdir .` doesn't work in 2.4 Benson Chow (Mon Jan 08 2001 - 17:11:08 EST)
      • Re: `rmdir .` doesn't work in 2.4 Andrea Arcangeli (Mon Jan 08 2001 - 17:37:34 EST)
      • Re: `rmdir .` doesn't work in 2.4 Wakko Warner (Mon Jan 08 2001 - 20:37:22 EST)
      • Re: `rmdir .` doesn't work in 2.4 Andrea Arcangeli (Mon Jan 08 2001 - 20:55:15 EST)
      • Re: `rmdir .` doesn't work in 2.4 Marc Lehmann (Mon Jan 08 2001 - 23:56:34 EST)
      • Re: `rmdir .` doesn't work in 2.4 Bernhard Rosenkraenzer (Thu Jan 11 2001 - 13:57:09 EST)
      • Re: `rmdir .` doesn't work in 2.4 Alexander Viro (Tue Jan 09 2001 - 08:39:53 EST)
    • Re: `rmdir .` doesn't work in 2.4 Pavel Machek (Fri Jan 12 2001 - 13:27:06 EST)
  • Re: `rmdir .` doesn't work in 2.4 Andries.Brouwer@cwi.nl (Mon Jan 08 2001 - 15:56:18 EST)
    • Re: `rmdir .` doesn't work in 2.4 Andrea Arcangeli (Mon Jan 08 2001 - 16:34:45 EST)
      • Re: `rmdir .` doesn't work in 2.4 Matthias Andree (Wed Jan 10 2001 - 17:25:04 EST)
  • Re: `rmdir .` doesn't work in 2.4 Andries.Brouwer@cwi.nl (Mon Jan 08 2001 - 17:50:44 EST)
    • Re: `rmdir .` doesn't work in 2.4 Andrea Arcangeli (Mon Jan 08 2001 - 18:22:36 EST)
    • Re: `rmdir .` doesn't work in 2.4 Kurt Roeckx (Tue Jan 09 2001 - 12:02:39 EST)
  • Re: `rmdir .` doesn't work in 2.4 Andries.Brouwer@cwi.nl (Tue Jan 09 2001 - 07:18:27 EST)
  • Re: `rmdir .` doesn't work in 2.4 Jesse Pollard (Tue Jan 09 2001 - 08:41:21 EST)
    • Re: `rmdir .` doesn't work in 2.4 Andrea Arcangeli (Tue Jan 09 2001 - 09:06:35 EST)
      • Re: `rmdir .` doesn't work in 2.4 Stephen C. Tweedie (Wed Jan 10 2001 - 09:47:35 EST)
      • Re: `rmdir .` doesn't work in 2.4 Andrea Arcangeli (Wed Jan 10 2001 - 10:03:59 EST)
      • Re: `rmdir .` doesn't work in 2.4 Alexander Viro (Wed Jan 10 2001 - 12:28:38 EST)
      • Re: `rmdir .` doesn't work in 2.4 Andrea Arcangeli (Wed Jan 10 2001 - 12:38:52 EST)
    • Re: `rmdir .` doesn't work in 2.4 Alexander Viro (Tue Jan 09 2001 - 09:23:54 EST)
  • Re: `rmdir .` doesn't work in 2.4 Jesse Pollard (Tue Jan 09 2001 - 09:38:23 EST)
• typo in linux-2.2.18/Documentation/usb/usb-serial.txt Hisaaki Shibata (Mon Jan 08 2001 - 12:24:07 EST)
  • Re: typo in linux-2.2.18/Documentation/usb/usb-serial.txt Greg KH (Mon Jan 08 2001 - 15:09:55 EST)
• [PATCH,serious] Fix raid5 crashes in 2.4.0 Andi Kleen (Mon Jan 08 2001 - 12:16:25 EST)
  • Re: [PATCH,serious] Fix raid5 crashes in 2.4.0 Ingo Molnar (Mon Jan 08 2001 - 12:18:39 EST)
  • Re: [PATCH,serious] Fix raid5 crashes in 2.4.0 Andrea Arcangeli (Mon Jan 08 2001 - 16:00:03 EST)
  • Re: [PATCH,serious] Fix raid5 crashes in 2.4.0 Richard Henderson (Mon Jan 08 2001 - 16:51:34 EST)
• [PATCH] Add CONFIG_X86_RUNTIME_XMM for 2.4. Andi Kleen (Mon Jan 08 2001 - 12:21:06 EST)
• Re: MM/VM todo list afei@jhu.edu (Mon Jan 08 2001 - 12:31:39 EST)
  • Re: MM/VM todo list Rik van Riel (Mon Jan 08 2001 - 12:36:23 EST)
    • Re: MM/VM todo list Rasmus Andersen (Mon Jan 08 2001 - 15:23:47 EST)
• Oops in 2.2.18 Lawrence Manning (Mon Jan 08 2001 - 13:36:51 EST)
• A Curious and Interesting Opportunity!! marc5858@usa.com (Mon Jan 08 2001 - 08:27:35 EST)
• Adaptec 19160 Problems Jason Perlow (Mon Jan 08 2001 - 18:30:39 EST)
  • Re: Adaptec 19160 Problems I Lee Hetherington (Mon Jan 08 2001 - 13:39:37 EST)
  • Re: Adaptec 19160 Problems Jason Perlow (Mon Jan 08 2001 - 18:46:05 EST)
  • Re: Adaptec 19160 Problems Jason Perlow (Mon Jan 08 2001 - 20:04:24 EST)
• blinking vga card Michal Medvecky (Mon Jan 08 2001 - 13:44:34 EST)
• Shared memory not enabled in 2.4.0? Steven_Snyder@3com.com (Mon Jan 08 2001 - 14:11:19 EST)
  • Re: Shared memory not enabled in 2.4.0? Richard B. Johnson (Mon Jan 08 2001 - 14:18:57 EST)
  • Re: Shared memory not enabled in 2.4.0? Brian Gerst (Mon Jan 08 2001 - 14:19:52 EST)
  • Re: Shared memory not enabled in 2.4.0? Gregory Maxwell (Mon Jan 08 2001 - 14:21:10 EST)
  • Re: Shared memory not enabled in 2.4.0? J . A . Magallon (Mon Jan 08 2001 - 14:26:42 EST)
  • Re: Shared memory not enabled in 2.4.0? Ernesto Hernandez-Novich (Mon Jan 08 2001 - 16:10:30 EST)
  • RE: Shared memory not enabled in 2.4.0? David Schwartz (Mon Jan 08 2001 - 18:21:03 EST)
  • Re: Shared memory not enabled in 2.4.0? Igmar Palsenberg (Tue Jan 09 2001 - 19:19:44 EST)
• Modules Question Christopher Harrer (Mon Jan 08 2001 - 14:13:20 EST)
• APM, virtual console problem in 2.4.0 Joseph Pingenot (Mon Jan 08 2001 - 14:16:53 EST)
• Re: lvm 0.8 to 0.9 conversion? Todd M. Roy (Mon Jan 08 2001 - 14:17:45 EST)
  • Re: lvm 0.8 to 0.9 conversion? Todd M. Roy (Mon Jan 08 2001 - 14:18:53 EST)
    • Re: lvm 0.8 to 0.9 conversion? Andrea Arcangeli (Mon Jan 08 2001 - 17:43:39 EST)
• xircom_tulip_cb Oliver Paukstadt (Mon Jan 08 2001 - 14:18:24 EST)
• [PATCH] pritk.c oneliner Pavel Rabel (Mon Jan 08 2001 - 14:14:47 EST)
• [patch] 2.4.0: defxx oopses upon insmod if short on memory Maciej W. Rozycki (Mon Jan 08 2001 - 14:27:09 EST)
  • Re: [patch] 2.4.0: defxx oopses upon insmod if short on memory Alan Cox (Mon Jan 08 2001 - 15:15:59 EST)
    • Re: [patch] 2.4.0: defxx oopses upon insmod if short on memory Maciej W. Rozycki (Mon Jan 08 2001 - 15:35:15 EST)
• test - please ignore Timur Tabi (Mon Jan 08 2001 - 14:27:16 EST)
• 2.2/2.4 on MSI 694D Pro-AIR (MS-6321) Paul Flinders (Mon Jan 08 2001 - 14:36:20 EST)
  • Re: 2.2/2.4 on MSI 694D Pro-AIR (MS-6321) Håvard Lygre (Wed Jan 10 2001 - 02:52:04 EST)
• Re: Confirmation request about new 2.4.x. kernel limits Pavel Machek (Fri Jan 05 2001 - 17:46:04 EST)
  • Re: Confirmation request about new 2.4.x. kernel limits Stephen C. Tweedie (Tue Jan 09 2001 - 09:03:34 EST)
• Re: [PATCH] More compile warning fixes for 2.4.0 Erik Mouw (Mon Jan 08 2001 - 14:50:01 EST)
  • Re: [PATCH] More compile warning fixes for 2.4.0 Alan Cox (Mon Jan 08 2001 - 15:17:53 EST)
  • Re: [PATCH] More compile warning fixes for 2.4.0 Rich Baum (Mon Jan 08 2001 - 20:23:56 EST)
  • Re: [PATCH] More compile warning fixes for 2.4.0 Richard Henderson (Tue Jan 09 2001 - 00:30:44 EST)
    • Re: [PATCH] More compile warning fixes for 2.4.0 Albert D. Cahalan (Tue Jan 09 2001 - 05:02:42 EST)
      • Re: [PATCH] More compile warning fixes for 2.4.0 Richard B. Johnson (Tue Jan 09 2001 - 10:10:16 EST)
      • Re: [PATCH] More compile warning fixes for 2.4.0 Linus Torvalds (Tue Jan 09 2001 - 13:51:23 EST)
      • Re: [PATCH] More compile warning fixes for 2.4.0 Albert D. Cahalan (Tue Jan 09 2001 - 16:24:38 EST)
      • Re: [PATCH] More compile warning fixes for 2.4.0 Linus Torvalds (Tue Jan 09 2001 - 16:31:35 EST)
      • Re: [PATCH] More compile warning fixes for 2.4.0 Andrea Arcangeli (Tue Jan 09 2001 - 21:20:48 EST)
      • Re: [PATCH] More compile warning fixes for 2.4.0 Linus Torvalds (Wed Jan 10 2001 - 02:10:37 EST)
      • Re: [PATCH] More compile warning fixes for 2.4.0 Rich Baum (Wed Jan 10 2001 - 08:17:11 EST)
      • Re: [PATCH] More compile warning fixes for 2.4.0 Andrea Arcangeli (Wed Jan 10 2001 - 08:32:35 EST)
      • Re: [PATCH] More compile warning fixes for 2.4.0 Marco Colombo (Wed Jan 10 2001 - 11:03:48 EST)
      • Re: [PATCH] More compile warning fixes for 2.4.0 Alan Shutko (Wed Jan 10 2001 - 11:52:56 EST)
      • Re: [PATCH] More compile warning fixes for 2.4.0 Marco Colombo (Wed Jan 10 2001 - 12:32:09 EST)
      • Re: [PATCH] More compile warning fixes for 2.4.0 Linus Torvalds (Wed Jan 10 2001 - 12:19:12 EST)
      • Re: [PATCH] More compile warning fixes for 2.4.0 Marco Colombo (Wed Jan 10 2001 - 13:02:58 EST)
      • Re: [PATCH] More compile warning fixes for 2.4.0 Rich Baum (Tue Jan 09 2001 - 20:58:35 EST)
• Re: Bug in 2.2 kernels (mysterious hangs after freeing unused memory) Erik Mouw (Mon Jan 08 2001 - 15:09:20 EST)
  • Re: Bug in 2.2 kernels (mysterious hangs after freeing unused memory) Blizbor (Mon Jan 08 2001 - 16:12:18 EST)
• real talk cards in 2.2.18. Timothy A. DeWees (Mon Jan 08 2001 - 15:22:01 EST)
  • Re: real talk cards in 2.2.18. Richard Torkar (Mon Jan 08 2001 - 15:43:11 EST)
    • Re: real talk cards in 2.2.18. Timothy A. DeWees (Mon Jan 08 2001 - 15:44:58 EST)
  • Re: real talk cards in 2.2.18. Ward Vandewege (Mon Jan 08 2001 - 15:43:28 EST)
    • Re: real talk cards in 2.2.18. Timothy A. DeWees (Mon Jan 08 2001 - 15:45:34 EST)
• Re: Linux-2.4.x patch submission policy Ingo Oeser (Mon Jan 08 2001 - 16:33:44 EST)
  • Re: Linux-2.4.x patch submission policy Rik van Riel (Mon Jan 08 2001 - 15:40:21 EST)
    • Re: Linux-2.4.x patch submission policy Roeland Th. Jansen (Wed Jan 10 2001 - 06:12:07 EST)
• Re: Ext2 (dma ?) error Michael Duelli (Mon Jan 08 2001 - 15:49:33 EST)
  • Re: Ext2 (dma ?) error Alan Cox (Mon Jan 08 2001 - 15:51:44 EST)
• Re: 2.4.0 APM w/ Compaq 16xx laptop... Erik Mouw (Mon Jan 08 2001 - 16:15:44 EST)
• prerelease-to-final braindamage Pavel Machek (Mon Jan 08 2001 - 16:34:35 EST)
• 2.2.19pre6aa1 degraded performance for me... Sasi Peter (Mon Jan 08 2001 - 16:46:29 EST)
  • Re: 2.2.19pre6aa1 degraded performance for me... Andrea Arcangeli (Mon Jan 08 2001 - 20:18:05 EST)
    • Re: 2.2.19pre6aa1 degraded performance for me... Sasi Peter (Tue Jan 09 2001 - 01:25:27 EST)
      • Re: 2.2.19pre6aa1 degraded performance for me... Sasi Peter (Tue Jan 09 2001 - 19:07:55 EST)
      • Re: 2.2.19pre6aa1 degraded performance for me... Andrea Arcangeli (Tue Jan 09 2001 - 19:31:09 EST)
• [PATCH] partition endianness fixes Andrzej Krzysztofowicz (Mon Jan 08 2001 - 16:44:17 EST)
• 2.2.18 and EMU10K1 problems... Taner Halicioglu (Mon Jan 08 2001 - 16:56:29 EST)
  • Re: 2.2.18 and EMU10K1 problems... Taner Halicioglu (Mon Jan 08 2001 - 16:58:47 EST)
  • Re: 2.2.18 and EMU10K1 problems... Prasanna P Subash (Tue Jan 09 2001 - 17:42:24 EST)
  • Re: 2.2.18 and EMU10K1 problems... Mikael Pettersson (Tue Jan 09 2001 - 19:32:50 EST)
• Re: DRI doesn't work on 2.4.0 but does on prerelease-ac5 Michael D. Crawford (Mon Jan 08 2001 - 13:35:43 EST)
  • Re: DRI doesn't work on 2.4.0 but does on prerelease-ac5 Bill Nottingham (Mon Jan 08 2001 - 17:06:17 EST)
  • Re: DRI doesn't work on 2.4.0 but does on prerelease-ac5 khromy (Mon Jan 08 2001 - 17:55:41 EST)
  • [OT]: DRI doesn't work on 2.4.0 but does on prerelease-ac5 J Sloan (Mon Jan 08 2001 - 17:56:05 EST)
    • Re: [OT]: DRI doesn't work on 2.4.0 but does on prerelease-ac5 Ragnar Hojland Espinosa (Mon Jan 08 2001 - 18:57:07 EST)
      • Re: [OT]: DRI doesn't work on 2.4.0 but does on prerelease-ac5 J Sloan (Mon Jan 08 2001 - 19:37:32 EST)
      • Re: [OT]: DRI doesn't work on 2.4.0 but does on prerelease-ac5 Ragnar Hojland Espinosa (Tue Jan 09 2001 - 11:11:07 EST)
      • xircom_tulip + NFS hanging interface Pau (Wed Jan 10 2001 - 02:41:20 EST)
    • Re: [OT]: DRI doesn't work on 2.4.0 but does on prerelease-ac5 Alan Olsen (Tue Jan 09 2001 - 03:20:17 EST)
  • Re: DRI doesn't work on 2.4.0 but does on prerelease-ac5 Michael D. Crawford (Mon Jan 08 2001 - 17:45:09 EST)
    • Re: DRI doesn't work on 2.4.0 but does on prerelease-ac5 Ragnar Hojland Espinosa (Tue Jan 09 2001 - 11:17:45 EST)
  • Re: DRI doesn't work on 2.4.0 but does on prerelease-ac5 Bill Crawford (Tue Jan 09 2001 - 23:21:25 EST)
    • Re: DRI doesn't work on 2.4.0 but does on prerelease-ac5 Alan Cox (Tue Jan 09 2001 - 23:37:05 EST)
      • Re: DRI doesn't work on 2.4.0 but does on prerelease-ac5 Alan Olsen (Wed Jan 10 2001 - 00:18:15 EST)
  • Re: DRI doesn't work on 2.4.0 but does on prerelease-ac5 Gareth Hughes (Wed Jan 10 2001 - 08:02:45 EST)
• bigmem (2GB in this case) patches for the 2.0.x kernel. Adam Scislowicz (Mon Jan 08 2001 - 17:20:53 EST)
• PCI IRQ routing on buggy BIOSes Petr Vandrovec (Mon Jan 08 2001 - 17:32:35 EST)
• Re: msg : cannot create ksymoops/nnnnn.ksyms f5ibh (Mon Jan 08 2001 - 17:30:12 EST)
  • Re: msg : cannot create ksymoops/nnnnn.ksyms Keith Owens (Mon Jan 08 2001 - 17:58:30 EST)
• Unified power management userspace policy John Fremlin (Mon Jan 08 2001 - 18:05:03 EST)
  • Re: Unified power management userspace policy Andrew Morton (Tue Jan 09 2001 - 05:52:38 EST)
  • Re: Unified power management userspace policy John Fremlin (Tue Jan 09 2001 - 08:54:50 EST)
    • Re: Unified power management userspace policy Andrew Morton (Tue Jan 09 2001 - 09:13:53 EST)
• Re: ipchains vs netfilter performance Rusty Russell (Mon Jan 08 2001 - 06:37:15 EST)
• Re: [reiserfs-list] BUG at inode.c:371 Geoff Hoff (Mon Jan 08 2001 - 18:12:38 EST)
  • Re: [uml-devel] Re: [reiserfs-list] BUG at inode.c:371 Jeff Dike (Mon Jan 08 2001 - 20:47:11 EST)
    • Re: [uml-devel] Re: [reiserfs-list] BUG at inode.c:371 Daniel Phillips (Mon Jan 08 2001 - 19:50:01 EST)
• Oops in stock 2.2.18 Mike Frisch (Mon Jan 08 2001 - 18:29:53 EST)
• HomePNA 2.0 flamage Joseph Wang (Mon Jan 08 2001 - 18:35:10 EST)
  • Re: HomePNA 2.0 flamage Alan Cox (Mon Jan 08 2001 - 18:54:16 EST)
    • Re: HomePNA 2.0 flamage Dan Hollis (Mon Jan 08 2001 - 19:00:45 EST)
    • Re: HomePNA 2.0 flamage Timur Tabi (Mon Jan 08 2001 - 18:59:52 EST)
• [PATCH] bmac.c: restore_flags on failure Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo (Mon Jan 08 2001 - 17:02:31 EST)
• [PATCH] de620.c: nitpicking Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo (Mon Jan 08 2001 - 17:11:04 EST)
  • Re: [PATCH] de620.c: nitpicking Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo (Mon Jan 08 2001 - 17:25:33 EST)
    • [PATCH] tidy 53c7,8xx.c was Re: [PATCH] de620.c: nitpicking Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo (Mon Jan 08 2001 - 17:30:02 EST)
      • [PATCH] advansys.c: include missing restore_flags, etc Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo (Mon Jan 08 2001 - 21:14:43 EST)
      • Re: [PATCH] advansys.c: include missing restore_flags, etc Pauline Middelink (Tue Jan 09 2001 - 02:30:07 EST)
      • Re: [PATCH] advansys.c: include missing restore_flags, etc Alan Cox (Tue Jan 09 2001 - 05:23:47 EST)
      • Re: [PATCH] advansys.c: include missing restore_flags, etc Pauline Middelink (Tue Jan 09 2001 - 18:12:55 EST)
      • Re: [PATCH] advansys.c: include missing restore_flags, etc Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo (Tue Jan 09 2001 - 05:06:02 EST)
      • Re: [PATCH] advansys.c: include missing restore_flags, etc Ralf Baechle (Wed Jan 10 2001 - 02:48:11 EST)
      • Re: [PATCH] advansys.c: include missing restore_flags, etc Russell King (Tue Jan 09 2001 - 05:02:14 EST)
      • [PATCH] ad1848.c: include missing restore_flags Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo (Tue Jan 09 2001 - 06:18:08 EST)
      • [PATCH] sscape.c: include missing restore_flags Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo (Tue Jan 09 2001 - 07:00:38 EST)
      • [PATCH] via-macii.c: restore_flags on failure Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo (Tue Jan 09 2001 - 07:24:04 EST)
      • [PATCH] dn_keyb.c: restore_flags on failure Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo (Tue Jan 09 2001 - 08:38:37 EST)
      • Re: [PATCH] dn_keyb.c: restore_flags on failure Alan Cox (Tue Jan 09 2001 - 11:17:30 EST)
      • Re: [PATCH] dn_keyb.c: restore_flags on failure Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo (Tue Jan 09 2001 - 10:30:19 EST)
• 2.2 vs. 2.4 benchmarks Chris Evans (Mon Jan 08 2001 - 19:20:52 EST)
  • Re: 2.2 vs. 2.4 benchmarks Marcelo Tosatti (Mon Jan 08 2001 - 19:18:16 EST)
  • Re: 2.2 vs. 2.4 benchmarks Helge Hafting (Tue Jan 09 2001 - 03:46:54 EST)
• adding a system call Mihai Moise (Mon Jan 08 2001 - 19:49:58 EST)
  • Re: adding a system call Mihai Moise (Tue Jan 09 2001 - 09:41:21 EST)
  • Re: adding a system call David Woodhouse (Tue Jan 09 2001 - 09:56:34 EST)
  • Re: adding a system call Doug McNaught (Tue Jan 09 2001 - 14:17:26 EST)
    • Re: adding a system call Brian Pomerantz (Tue Jan 09 2001 - 14:34:47 EST)
• FS callback routines Sean R. Bright (Mon Jan 08 2001 - 20:21:31 EST)
  • Re: FS callback routines Michael D. Crawford (Mon Jan 08 2001 - 18:12:24 EST)
    • RE: FS callback routines Sean R. Bright (Mon Jan 08 2001 - 21:37:05 EST)
    • Re: FS callback routines David Weinehall (Mon Jan 08 2001 - 22:48:34 EST)
    • Re: FS callback routines Daniel Phillips (Tue Jan 09 2001 - 08:07:24 EST)
      • Re: FS callback routines Jamie Lokier (Wed Jan 10 2001 - 05:56:32 EST)
      • Re: FS callback routines Daniel Phillips (Wed Jan 10 2001 - 13:25:39 EST)
      • Re: FS callback routines Daniel Phillips (Thu Jan 11 2001 - 09:30:14 EST)
      • Re: FS callback routines Jamie Lokier (Thu Jan 11 2001 - 10:37:03 EST)
      • Re: FS callback routines Daniel Phillips (Thu Jan 11 2001 - 11:11:57 EST)
  • Re: FS callback routines Daniel Stodden (Tue Jan 09 2001 - 06:34:25 EST)
  • Re: FS callback routines Philipp Matthias Hahn (Tue Jan 09 2001 - 06:22:09 EST)
  • Re: FS callback routines Jesse Pollard (Tue Jan 09 2001 - 09:05:29 EST)
    • Re: FS callback routines Daniel Phillips (Tue Jan 09 2001 - 10:41:08 EST)
      • Re: FS callback routines Jamie Lokier (Wed Jan 10 2001 - 05:48:25 EST)
  • Re: FS callback routines Jesse Pollard (Wed Jan 10 2001 - 10:18:35 EST)
  • Re: FS callback routines Jesse Pollard (Thu Jan 11 2001 - 11:39:25 EST)
    • Re: FS callback routines Daniel Phillips (Thu Jan 11 2001 - 12:53:22 EST)
• [PATCH][2.4] eepro 0.12c aris@cathedrallabs.org (Mon Jan 08 2001 - 18:49:48 EST)
• [PATCH][2.2] eepro 0.12d aris@cathedrallabs.org (Mon Jan 08 2001 - 18:50:21 EST)
• [PATCH] 2.4.0-ac4 : Removal of drivers/misc/misc.o Frank Davis (Mon Jan 08 2001 - 20:50:32 EST)
• [patch] mm-cleanup-2 (2.4.0) Zlatko Calusic (Mon Jan 08 2001 - 19:59:32 EST)
• [PATCH] eata_dma.c: include missing restore_flags Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo (Mon Jan 08 2001 - 21:29:24 EST)
• netfilter ipv6 as module unresolved symbols Frank Dekervel (Mon Jan 08 2001 - 22:23:29 EST)
  • Re: netfilter ipv6 as module unresolved symbols Rusty Russell (Wed Jan 10 2001 - 05:16:36 EST)
• [PATCH] 2.4.0 Changes - add compiler source code URL, minor cleanup Barry K. Nathan (Mon Jan 08 2001 - 22:24:17 EST)
• AHA1542 driver does not accept command-line options Dmitry Potapov (Mon Jan 08 2001 - 22:28:00 EST)
• RE: Confirmation request about new 2.4.x. kernel limits Venkatesh Ramamurthy (Mon Jan 08 2001 - 23:11:05 EST)
  • Re: Confirmation request about new 2.4.x. kernel limits Matti Aarnio (Tue Jan 09 2001 - 07:21:56 EST)
    • Re: Confirmation request about new 2.4.x. kernel limits Tim Wright (Tue Jan 09 2001 - 11:27:49 EST)
      • Re: Confirmation request about new 2.4.x. kernel limits Andi Kleen (Tue Jan 09 2001 - 11:44:46 EST)
      • Re: Confirmation request about new 2.4.x. kernel limits Tim Wright (Tue Jan 09 2001 - 11:50:01 EST)
      • Re: Confirmation request about new 2.4.x. kernel limits Kurt Garloff (Wed Jan 10 2001 - 08:16:17 EST)
  • Re: Confirmation request about new 2.4.x. kernel limits Stephen C. Tweedie (Tue Jan 09 2001 - 09:05:04 EST)
  • RE: Confirmation request about new 2.4.x. kernel limits Venkatesh Ramamurthy (Tue Jan 09 2001 - 10:15:34 EST)
    • Re: Confirmation request about new 2.4.x. kernel limits Andi Kleen (Tue Jan 09 2001 - 10:51:05 EST)
  • RE: Confirmation request about new 2.4.x. kernel limits Venkatesh Ramamurthy (Tue Jan 09 2001 - 12:35:02 EST)
    • Re: Confirmation request about new 2.4.x. kernel limits Andi Kleen (Tue Jan 09 2001 - 12:47:55 EST)
  • RE: Confirmation request about new 2.4.x. kernel limits Venkatesh Ramamurthy (Tue Jan 09 2001 - 13:00:03 EST)
• question on generating a patch David L. Parsley (Mon Jan 08 2001 - 23:32:04 EST)
  • Re: question on generating a patch Peter Samuelson (Tue Jan 09 2001 - 00:14:43 EST)
• UDP performance drop from -test9 to 2.4.0 (fwd) Todd (Mon Jan 08 2001 - 23:33:56 EST)
• Sorry about the email. . (re: 2.4.0-ac4) David Joyce (Tue Jan 09 2001 - 00:50:14 EST)
• [Announcement] kgdb - unofficial (untested) patch available for 2.4.0 Paul Schulz (Tue Jan 09 2001 - 01:56:11 EST)
• Failure building 2.4 while running 2.4. Success in building 2.4 while running 2.2. Silviu Marin-Caea (Tue Jan 09 2001 - 04:12:47 EST)
  • Re: Failure building 2.4 while running 2.4. Success in building 2.4 while running 2.2. Alessandro Suardi (Tue Jan 09 2001 - 05:17:58 EST)
    • Re: Failure building 2.4 while running 2.4. Success in building 2.4 Alan Cox (Tue Jan 09 2001 - 05:33:29 EST)
      • Re: Failure building 2.4 while running 2.4. There is no such thing. Silviu Marin-Caea (Tue Jan 09 2001 - 13:20:36 EST)
      • Re: Failure building 2.4 while running 2.4. There is no such thing. Alan Cox (Tue Jan 09 2001 - 13:43:52 EST)
      • Drivers under 2.4 Dennis (Tue Jan 09 2001 - 14:57:20 EST)
      • suser checks in 2.2.x Bosko Radivojevic (Tue Jan 09 2001 - 15:13:46 EST)
      • Re: suser checks in 2.2.x Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo (Tue Jan 09 2001 - 13:39:30 EST)
      • Re: Drivers under 2.4 Dennis (Wed Jan 10 2001 - 13:22:16 EST)
      • Re: Drivers under 2.4 Hans Grobler (Wed Jan 10 2001 - 15:01:11 EST)
      • Re: Drivers under 2.4 Dennis (Wed Jan 10 2001 - 16:37:06 EST)
      • Re: Drivers under 2.4 Andi Kleen (Wed Jan 10 2001 - 16:38:36 EST)
      • Re: Drivers under 2.4 Hans Grobler (Wed Jan 10 2001 - 17:08:24 EST)
      • Re: Drivers under 2.4 Danny ter Haar (Thu Jan 11 2001 - 05:24:01 EST)
      • Re: Drivers under 2.4 Andi Kleen (Thu Jan 11 2001 - 05:31:34 EST)
      • Re: Drivers under 2.4 Danny ter Haar (Thu Jan 11 2001 - 05:58:33 EST)
      • Re: Drivers under 2.4 Andrew Morton (Thu Jan 11 2001 - 06:36:17 EST)
      • Re: Drivers under 2.4 Danny ter Haar (Thu Jan 11 2001 - 06:58:55 EST)
      • Re: Drivers under 2.4 Danny ter Haar (Thu Jan 11 2001 - 09:00:26 EST)
      • Re: Drivers under 2.4 Jeff Garzik (Thu Jan 11 2001 - 09:32:49 EST)
      • Re: Drivers under 2.4 Danny ter Haar (Thu Jan 11 2001 - 11:33:14 EST)
      • Re: Drivers under 2.4 Hans Grobler (Thu Jan 11 2001 - 11:44:48 EST)
      • PRoblem with pcnet32 under 2.4.0 , was :Drivers under 2.4 Danny ter Haar (Fri Jan 12 2001 - 06:50:10 EST)
      • Re: PRoblem with pcnet32 under 2.4.0 , was :Drivers under 2.4 Hans Grobler (Fri Jan 12 2001 - 07:01:15 EST)</