Re: khttpd beaten by boa

From: Alan Cox (alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk)
Date: Fri Jan 12 2001 - 05:22:59 EST

Next message: David Woodhouse: "Re: Where did vm_operations_struct->unmap in 2.4.0 go?"
Previous message: Alan Cox: "Re: 2.4 ate my filesystem on rw-mount"
In reply to: H. Peter Anvin: "Re: khttpd beaten by boa"
Next in thread: Ingo Molnar: "lies, lies and web benchmarks :-)"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

> > TUX is evidence that khttpd can be done properly and
> > beat the pants off of anything done in userspace.
> >
>
> Then why don't we unload khttpd and put in Tux?

Tux needs the zero copy patches I believe so zero copy has to precede it
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: David Woodhouse: "Re: Where did vm_operations_struct->unmap in 2.4.0 go?"
Previous message: Alan Cox: "Re: 2.4 ate my filesystem on rw-mount"
In reply to: H. Peter Anvin: "Re: khttpd beaten by boa"
Next in thread: Ingo Molnar: "lies, lies and web benchmarks :-)"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Jan 15 2001 - 21:00:33 EST