Re: [linux-audio-dev] low-latency scheduling patch for 2.4.0

From: David S. Miller (davem@redhat.com)
Date: Thu Jan 11 2001 - 16:31:11 EST


Nigel Gamble writes:
> That's why MontaVista's kernel preemption patch uses sleeping mutex
> locks instead of spinlocks for the long held locks.

Anyone who uses sleeping mutex locks is asking for trouble. Priority
inversion is an issue I dearly hope we never have to deal with in the
Linux kernel, and sleeping SMP mutex locks lead to exactly this kind
of problem.

Later,
David S. Miller
davem@redhat.com
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Jan 15 2001 - 21:00:32 EST