Re: Strange umount problem in latest 2.4.0 kernels

From: Daniel Phillips (phillips@innominate.de)
Date: Thu Jan 11 2001 - 13:33:08 EST

Next message: Matthew D. Pitts: "Re: Compile error: DRM without AGP in 2.4.0"
Previous message: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo: "[PATCH] ide-probe.c: check kmalloc return"
In reply to: Udo A. Steinberg: "Strange umount problem in latest 2.4.0 kernels"
Next in thread: Alexander Viro: "Re: Strange umount problem in latest 2.4.0 kernels"
Reply: Alexander Viro: "Re: Strange umount problem in latest 2.4.0 kernels"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

"Udo A. Steinberg" wrote:
> Upon fscking after reboot, I always have errors on a
> single inode and it's always the same one:
>
> /dev/hdb1: Inode 522901, i_blocks is 64, should be 8. FIXED
>
> Can someone tell me an easy and reliable way of figuring
> out which file (program) uses said inode? I think that's
> probably the key to figuring out why the partition is
> busy on umount.

ls -iR | grep 12345

--
Daniel
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Matthew D. Pitts: "Re: Compile error: DRM without AGP in 2.4.0"
Previous message: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo: "[PATCH] ide-probe.c: check kmalloc return"
In reply to: Udo A. Steinberg: "Strange umount problem in latest 2.4.0 kernels"
Next in thread: Alexander Viro: "Re: Strange umount problem in latest 2.4.0 kernels"
Reply: Alexander Viro: "Re: Strange umount problem in latest 2.4.0 kernels"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Jan 15 2001 - 21:00:31 EST