Re: [PATCH] cramfs is ro only, so honour this in inode->mode

From: Albert D. Cahalan (acahalan@cs.uml.edu)
Date: Tue Jan 09 2001 - 06:16:23 EST

Next message: Albert D. Cahalan: "Re: [PATCH] More compile warning fixes for 2.4.0"
Previous message: Felix Maibaum: "2.4.0 bug in SHM an via-rhine or is it my fault?"
In reply to: Shane Nay: "Re: [PATCH] cramfs is ro only, so honour this in inode->mode"
Next in thread: Linus Torvalds: "Re: [PATCH] cramfs is ro only, so honour this in inode->mode"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Shane Nay writes:

> but the bits are useless in the "normal interpretation" of it,
...
> But then you pull out the write bits,

If you need to steal a bit, grab one that won't hurt.
Take the owner's read bit. (owner may read own files)
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Albert D. Cahalan: "Re: [PATCH] More compile warning fixes for 2.4.0"
Previous message: Felix Maibaum: "2.4.0 bug in SHM an via-rhine or is it my fault?"
In reply to: Shane Nay: "Re: [PATCH] cramfs is ro only, so honour this in inode->mode"
Next in thread: Linus Torvalds: "Re: [PATCH] cramfs is ro only, so honour this in inode->mode"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Jan 15 2001 - 21:00:21 EST