On Fri, Dec 15, 2000 at 06:59:24PM +0100, Franz Sirl wrote:
> It's required by ISO C, and since that's the standard now, gcc spits out a
> warning. Just adding a ; is enough and already done for most stuff in
> 2.4.0-test12.
I'm not complaining gcc folks, I just dislike the new behaviour in general,
it's inconsistent.
This is wrong:
x()
{
switch (1) {
case 0:
case 1:
case 2:
case 3:
}
}
and this is right:
x()
{
switch (1) {
case 0:
case 1:
case 2:
case 3:
;
}
}
Why am I required to put a `;' only in the last case and not in all
the previous ones? Or maybe gcc-latest is forgetting to complain about
the previous ones ;)
Anyway it's a minor issue, if the standard says so we'll live with it.
(and it's also getting offtopic...)
Andrea
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Dec 15 2000 - 21:00:33 EST