On Mon, 11 Dec 2000, Alan Cox wrote:
> > Doing a 'make bzImage' is NOT VM-intensive. Using this as a test
> > for the VM doesn't make any sense since it doesn't really excercise
> > the VM in any way...
>
> Its an interesting demo that 2.4 has some performance problems since 2.2
> is slower than 2.0 although nowdays not much.
How much of that is due to the fact that the 2.4.0 scheduler interrupts
processes more often than 2.2.x? Is the better interactivity worth the
slight drop in performance?
Gerhard
-- Gerhard Mack<>< As a computer I find your faith in technology amusing.
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Dec 15 2000 - 21:00:22 EST