Re: ATA-4, ATA-5 TCQ status

From: Sasi Peter (sape@iq.rulez.org)
Date: Sun Nov 26 2000 - 19:45:20 EST

Next message: Rogier Wolff: "Re: Universal debug macros."
Previous message: Toby Jaffey: ""hda lost interrupt" in 2.4-test11, fat32 corruption"
In reply to: Jens Axboe: "Re: ATA-4, ATA-5 TCQ status"
Next in thread: Jens Axboe: "Re: ATA-4, ATA-5 TCQ status"
Reply: Jens Axboe: "Re: ATA-4, ATA-5 TCQ status"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Mon, 27 Nov 2000, Jens Axboe wrote:

> > I would like to ask if the tagged command queueing capability in the
> > decent ATA standards is utilized in the linux IDE driver (2.2 2.2ide
> ^^^^^^
> > patches, or 2.4 maybe...)?
> I hope that is supposed to be 'recent', because with the current TCQ

If you think I should have...

> implementation listed in the specs Linux might as well not support it :)
> It's simply not worth it.

But seriously, how come?

I thought they just somewhat like copied the SCSI implementation...

PS: Anybody knowing about a multi (>2) channel UATA host adapter?

-- SaPE - Peter, Sasi - mailto:sape@sch.hu - http://sape.iq.rulez.org/

- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Rogier Wolff: "Re: Universal debug macros."
Previous message: Toby Jaffey: ""hda lost interrupt" in 2.4-test11, fat32 corruption"
In reply to: Jens Axboe: "Re: ATA-4, ATA-5 TCQ status"
Next in thread: Jens Axboe: "Re: ATA-4, ATA-5 TCQ status"
Reply: Jens Axboe: "Re: ATA-4, ATA-5 TCQ status"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Nov 30 2000 - 21:00:16 EST