Re: ATA-4, ATA-5 TCQ status

From: Jens Axboe (axboe@suse.de)
Date: Sun Nov 26 2000 - 19:28:12 EST

Next message: Toby Jaffey: ""hda lost interrupt" in 2.4-test11, fat32 corruption"
Previous message: David Ford: "Re: [PATCH] modutils 2.3.20 and beyond"
In reply to: Sasi Peter: "ATA-4, ATA-5 TCQ status"
Next in thread: Sasi Peter: "Re: ATA-4, ATA-5 TCQ status"
Reply: Sasi Peter: "Re: ATA-4, ATA-5 TCQ status"
Reply: Andre Hedrick: "Re: ATA-4, ATA-5 TCQ status"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Mon, Nov 27 2000, Sasi Peter wrote:
> Hi!
>
> I would like to ask if the tagged command queueing capability in the
> decent ATA standards is utilized in the linux IDE driver (2.2 2.2ide
^^^^^^
> patches, or 2.4 maybe...)?

I hope that is supposed to be 'recent', because with the current TCQ
implementation listed in the specs Linux might as well not support it :)
It's simply not worth it.

-- 
* Jens Axboe <axboe@suse.de>
* SuSE Labs
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Toby Jaffey: ""hda lost interrupt" in 2.4-test11, fat32 corruption"
Previous message: David Ford: "Re: [PATCH] modutils 2.3.20 and beyond"
In reply to: Sasi Peter: "ATA-4, ATA-5 TCQ status"
Next in thread: Sasi Peter: "Re: ATA-4, ATA-5 TCQ status"
Reply: Sasi Peter: "Re: ATA-4, ATA-5 TCQ status"
Reply: Andre Hedrick: "Re: ATA-4, ATA-5 TCQ status"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Nov 30 2000 - 21:00:16 EST